The Consensus Clash: Adam Back Trashes BIP-110 "Ordinals Ban" as Soft Fork Deadline Collapses ⛏️⚡ $BTC is heading toward a high-stakes protocol milestone as the controversial BIP-110 soft-fork proposal enters its final three-week window before the August 2 block 961,632 deadline. Designed as a temporary one-year ban on Ordinals inscriptions, BRC-20s, and oversized OP_RETURN payloads, the proposal’s activist backing is getting completely crushed by real-world network consensus. Blockstream CEO Adam Back issued a scathing critique of BIP-110 advocates framing the fork as a "true Bitcoiner" loyalty test, declaring flatly: "They don't know Bitcoin."The fundamental rift highlights an absolute breakdown in the proposal's execution model: The Mining Apathy: To lock in consensus under reduced activation rules, BIP-110 requires a 55% hash rate signal. On-chain data shows actual miner signaling participation sitting at an abysmal 0.86%. The Economic Neutrality: Back and Strategy’s Michael Saylor argue that block space must remain economically neutral, leaving fee prioritization to open market dynamics rather than subjective protocol-level censorship. My take: The User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF) push via Bitcoin Knots 29.2 is an absolute dead end. In three weeks, non-signaling nodes will simply ignore the minority chain, forcing the fork into an immediate hash rate void. Attempts to alter Bitcoin’s consensus through social media ultimatums inevitably collapse when confronted by miner economics and market reality. 🛡️🚨 #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?# #BTC