Binance Square
#ususd

ususd

417 Aufrufe
5 Kommentare
ETH 加西亚
·
--
Artikel
Übersetzung ansehen
Selling a machine’s instincts to the highest bidder.I’ve been thinking about the sheer volume of "trading agents" suddenly flooding my feed, and honestly, it just feels like the same old snake oil wrapped in a shiny new LLM wrapper. We’ve gone from copy-trading human degens to copy-trading autonomous scripts, and we are pretending it’s different because there’s "AI" under the hood. But it isn't. If a developer builds a highly profitable model, why would they ever share it? In traditional finance, you keep your edge hidden. In crypto, the default state is to open-source or monetize it in a marketplace. But a marketplace for autonomous strategies introduces a really weird trust dynamic. You aren’t just buying a piece of software; you’re buying an active decision-maker. If that agent runs amok during a flash crash, who is responsible? The developer who wrote the model? The user who funded it? Or the network that hosted it? Most platforms seem to ignore this entirely, focusing only on the hype of "monetizing AI." I caught myself looking at Newton Protocol ($NEWT) the other day, mostly because they seem to be wrestling with this exact tension. They’re trying to build a secure rollup to handle these AI-driven strategies, alongside a marketplace where developers can deploy and share them. The angle of using a dedicated rollup for execution makes sense—if you’re going to let these things loose, they need to run in an isolated environment where the inputs, outputs, and execution steps are verifiable. It's a step away from just hoping the code behaves. But even if Newton manages to secure the execution layer, the human element still worries me. A verifiable rollup can prove that a strategy executed exactly how it was programmed to, but it can’t prove that the strategy itself was actually good. A perfectly executed bad idea is still a bad idea. We are building faster, more secure pipelines to lose money autonomously. Maybe the real hurdle isn’t finding developers who can build smarter agents. Maybe it’s finding a way to distribute these models without turning the whole ecosystem into a game of hot potato with financial risk. I still don't know who we are supposed to trust when the market starts moving faster than the humans watching it. #Newt @NewtonProtocol #usUSD $NEWT {future}(NEWTUSDT) $US {future}(USUSDT)

Selling a machine’s instincts to the highest bidder.

I’ve been thinking about the sheer volume of "trading agents" suddenly flooding my feed, and honestly, it just feels like the same old snake oil wrapped in a shiny new LLM wrapper. We’ve gone from copy-trading human degens to copy-trading autonomous scripts, and we are pretending it’s different because there’s "AI" under the hood. But it isn't.
If a developer builds a highly profitable model, why would they ever share it? In traditional finance, you keep your edge hidden. In crypto, the default state is to open-source or monetize it in a marketplace. But a marketplace for autonomous strategies introduces a really weird trust dynamic. You aren’t just buying a piece of software; you’re buying an active decision-maker. If that agent runs amok during a flash crash, who is responsible? The developer who wrote the model? The user who funded it? Or the network that hosted it? Most platforms seem to ignore this entirely, focusing only on the hype of "monetizing AI."
I caught myself looking at Newton Protocol ($NEWT ) the other day, mostly because they seem to be wrestling with this exact tension. They’re trying to build a secure rollup to handle these AI-driven strategies, alongside a marketplace where developers can deploy and share them. The angle of using a dedicated rollup for execution makes sense—if you’re going to let these things loose, they need to run in an isolated environment where the inputs, outputs, and execution steps are verifiable. It's a step away from just hoping the code behaves.
But even if Newton manages to secure the execution layer, the human element still worries me. A verifiable rollup can prove that a strategy executed exactly how it was programmed to, but it can’t prove that the strategy itself was actually good. A perfectly executed bad idea is still a bad idea. We are building faster, more secure pipelines to lose money autonomously.
Maybe the real hurdle isn’t finding developers who can build smarter agents. Maybe it’s finding a way to distribute these models without turning the whole ecosystem into a game of hot potato with financial risk. I still don't know who we are supposed to trust when the market starts moving faster than the humans watching it.
#Newt @NewtonProtocol #usUSD
$NEWT
$US
ÏMŖÄŅ ŖÖĻËX:
Newton Protocol is addressing an important challenge by making AI-powered on-chain actions more transparent and verifiable.
Anmelden und weiter Inhalte entdecken
Krypto-Nutzer weltweit auf Binance Square kennenlernen
⚡️ Bleib in Sachen Krypto stets am Puls.
💬 Die weltgrößte Kryptobörse vertraut darauf.
👍 Erhalte verlässliche Einblicke von verifizierten Creators.
E-Mail-Adresse/Telefonnummer