Last week Morgan Stanley dropped a supply chain teardown report right after $NVDA's launch event. Storage, PCB, and MLCC sectors all popped hard.
Here's what Morgan Stanley actually said: The unit value of NVIDIA Rubin/VR200 NVL72 rack is about to jump big time — from around $3.99M for GB300 to roughly $7.8M. Nearly doubled.
The real kicker? Memory. With SOCAMM/memory price and capacity going up, memory's share of total BOM jumped from single digits (GB200/GB300) to about 26%, around $2M per rack. GPU is still the biggest cost item, but its share dropped from ~63% to ~51%.
Downstream components that benefit most: PCB, MLCC, ABF substrate, power supply, and cooling. PCB content per rack went from ~$35K to $117K — up 233%. Main reason: new midplane, ConnectX, BlueField modules, plus more layers and higher-grade materials for compute/switch PCBs. MLCC up 182%, ABF up 82%. Basically Rubin's value-add is spreading across board-level interconnects, high-end passive components, and advanced substrates.
One thing the market underestimates: ODMs. Morgan Stanley thinks Rubin's tray standardization won't squeeze ODM value-added. Instead, because of system complexity, new module assembly/testing, liquid cooling, and rack-level assembly, ODM value-added per rack actually goes up from ~$108K to ~$150K, up about 38%. Sure, gross margin drops from ~2.7% (GB300) to ~1.9% (VR200), but absolute dollar profit still rises.
Investment picks: Morgan Stanley favors Wiwynn most, then Wistron, Quanta, Hon Hai. On the component side: Delta, AVC, Unimicron, ZDT, FIT.
Bottom line — Rubin isn't just a GPU upgrade. It's AI racks evolving from compute boxes into high-density system engineering. Value-add spreads to memory, PCB, MLCC, ABF, power, cooling, and ODM assembly/testing.
Fun fact about Macau residency that most people don't know:
You can freely trade US and HK stocks, zero capital gains tax, plus the government literally gives you 10k cash every year. They even have a partnership with Binance.
But here's the catch — you gotta physically live there for 7 years to get the ID. Can't just commute from mainland China, they'll cancel your visa if you're not actually staying there.
So yeah, moving south has its trade-offs. I'm probably one of the few Macau son-in-laws you'll find on X lol
Heard a wild story from a Chaoshan friend today — real grassroots wealth creation.
So there's this movie "A Letter to Grandma," right? Halfway through filming, they ran out of money. The crew went around begging for investment, got rejected everywhere. Makes sense — who wants to fund a niche tearjerker about grandmas?
Normally you'd lose money on something like this. But Chaoshan people have this thing where they help each other out, no questions asked. My friend threw in some cash basically as a donation, just to help a fellow townsman. Didn't expect anything back.
Plot twist: the movie accidentally blew up. Now it's closing in on 1 billion yuan at the box office. That "donation" turned into serious returns — probably 10x, maybe more.
Classic case of stumbling into gold while trying to do someone a favor. The Chaoshan network is no joke — tight-knit communities can create these weird asymmetric opportunities that outsiders never even hear about.
And the first iPhone OS 1? That's pushing 20 years now.
Time flies. Makes you think about tech cycles — what felt cutting-edge back then is ancient history now. Kinda wild how fast things move in this space.
When CT folks say they're leaving crypto for US stocks, what are we really talking about?
It's all about secondary trading — you go where liquidity is deep, where the game is real, where attention flows. But if you're actually building stuff? Honestly, chill. No need to panic.
You know crypto has cycles, right? Well guess what — US stocks have cycles too. AI has cycles. Everything does.
Think about it: is crypto really dead? Is US stocks suddenly the promised land? Nah. US stocks have always been solid. Crypto's always been tiny in comparison. The fish next door were always bigger.
We just stayed in one pond too long. Got that 'grass is greener' feeling.
But here's what's different this time — CT isn't just chasing alpha anymore. People are asking: what's the ceiling on this alpha? What's the cap on this strategy?
You gotta know if you're eating alpha or beta. If you're jumping into US stocks now because some influencer told you to? You're probably catching beta (riding the overall wave up). Real alpha only comes when you dig deep into your own domain and find something others missed.
Classic Trump move just happened again. He called up Israel, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar and a bunch of others, then announced he's basically got a peace deal with Iran in the bag.
And of course, Iran immediately came out and said "nope, didn't happen."
This is literally the playbook now — announce the win first, let everyone else scramble to respond. Whether it actually moves markets or just creates noise... we'll see. But if you're trading anything Middle East-related or oil-linked, probably worth keeping an eye on this circus 🎪
Just realized something wild — U.S. stocks have 2-3x the net profit margin of A-shares. Like, you put in $100, U.S. stocks make you $28/year, but A-shares only $13. That's the fundamental gap right there.
Honestly don't get why people still juggle both markets at the same time 🤷
Noticed something funny on Chinese X timeline lately.
Overnight it went from everyone shilling VPNs → now everyone's shilling HK/US stock brokers 😂
Common thread? The market leaders all got smacked by regulators.
Classic playbook — when the big guys get taken down, suddenly everyone's an affiliate marketer for the alternatives. Seen this movie before in crypto, now it's happening with brokers.
Just saying, when your feed suddenly floods with "best broker" recommendations, maybe do your own homework first. These affiliate codes don't pay for themselves lol
Got my refund from Kuailian VPN today. Applied May 8th, took 13 days to process. Gotta say, they actually have some integrity — not like those crypto projects that just rug pull the moment volume dries up. And before they disappear? They dump everything, crash the token to zero, THEN vanish. At least Kuailian keeps it real.
Called it last Sunday — said if $BTC couldn't reclaim 80k, watch out for a pullback toward 74k. Today it dropped to 75k, pretty much hit the target. Sometimes the chart just tells you what's coming 📉
$BTC dropped below $76K today. People keep asking why.
Honestly? It's not one headline. It's three things hitting at once.
First — Trump Media pulled their ETF application. Yeah, the guy who's supposed to be crypto's biggest cheerleader. Official reason? Market's too crowded, can't compete with BlackRock. But the real damage? The optics. Your loudest supporter just bailed.
Second — $BTC ETFs saw nearly $1B outflow in two days. These aren't retail panic sellers. These are institutions stepping back. They're waiting for clearer signals. And when institutions move out, retail enthusiasm doesn't fill that gap.
Third — macro hasn't budged. U.S. Treasury yields still sitting at 2007 highs. Inflation's sticky. Rate cut window keeps shrinking. That's the ceiling for ALL risk assets. Even NVDA's earnings beat couldn't lift this weight.
These three lines didn't accidentally line up on the same day. ETF outflows = institutions pricing in macro reality. Pulled application = cracks in the narrative. Treasury yields = the systemic pressure underneath everything.
Long-term play: opening US/HK stock accounts for users in certain regions. Still a market people will fight over.
A broker friend shared their internal data — mainland users have a 0.45 deposit conversion rate, but overseas users? Less than 0.1.
Translation: mainland users actually need this. They go through the hassle of registering, and nearly half of them fund their accounts and keep trading. Overseas users have too many broker options, so most just download or register and bounce.
The conversion gap is wild. Real demand vs. window shopping.
SpaceX Starship just nailed atmospheric re-entry + landing this morning — yeah it tipped over in the water afterward because of unstable floating, but honestly they're getting SO close to catching it mid-air now 🚀
Still wild to think Musk pitched this Mars colonization dream back in 2012. Step by step, getting there.
The bounce is over, now we're back to sliding down. Currently hit MicroStrategy's average cost — pretty key spot. If it keeps dropping (high probability), $69k is the next level to watch.
But here's the thing: last bounce touched $82k and broke above the 20-day MA. That's actually a relatively strong rebound. So this dip? Not as gloomy as it feels.
Next few months might be the final dark stretch of this bear cycle. New bull run could kick off Q4 this year.
Lot of people scared of AI prices being "too high." But when you zoom out on the trend, entry price matters way less than you think. When I first got into crypto, $BTC was around $100. Back then everyone thought it was "too expensive" too. Buffett didn't buy Apple at the bottom either.
Believe in long-term trends. Focus on quality assets and solid people around you. Hold tight, and keep building income outside the market.
Woke up this morning, some folks trading US stocks insisting it's 1999 all over again. Saying Nokia and Blackberry are the hottest plays, IBM and Dell flying to the moon too.
Tech's been chasing two impossible dreams forever:
1. Living forever — especially the rich and powerful, they all want immortality. Recent years we've seen some real breakthroughs in organ transplants and cell reprogramming trials. People are living longer, sure, but actual immortality? Still way off.
2. Time travel — going back to fix regrets, change the future, make today better. Like imagine buying 100 $BTC back in 2010. We all wish we could do that.
Both still pipe dreams, but the progress on #1 is actually getting interesting.
Just noticed something funny about the new crypto bros this year 😭
You were doing fine trading crypto, then suddenly decided to pivot into "value investing" by buying US stocks.
But guess what? The stocks you picked are literally Trump-backed crypto-flavored companies anyway.
Then boom — a few days into US stock trading, policy changes hit like it's 2017's 94 ban all over again.
Is it just me or do crypto people have a natural instinct for buying projects where founders dump on them endlessly? Like we're magnetically attracted to infinite token unlocks or something lol