Zveřejnit
When I first checked out @Walrus 🦭/acc , I assumed its economics would feel like cloud storage. Upload more and pay proportionally. Old AWS habits die hard. But Walrus operates in a tougher arena with decentralized nodes that can drop out, shifting incentives, and no central safety net.
AWS thrives on endless scale and over provisioning. Walrus cannot rely on that. Instead, it uses erasure coding through its Red Stuff design to achieve roughly four to five times redundancy. That may sound high, but compared to the ten times or more full replication many decentralized systems require for real durability, it is far more efficient.
That overhead buys statistical resilience. Data can still be reconstructed even if a large portion of nodes disappear. These failure scenarios have been stress tested, and the underlying math has proven reliable.
Storage is prepaid in fixed epochs rather than billed through monthly metering. This places risk directly on the protocol’s design and keeps incentives tight. There is no room for growth fueled subsidies like those centralized providers relied on for years.
In early 2026, decentralized storage is attracting serious capital. Walrus raised around 140 million dollars from major backers including Standard Crypto and a16z crypto, reaching a valuation near 2 billion dollars. This was not driven by hype but by the goal of delivering reliable data availability without bloated overhead.
The contrast is clear. AWS optimized for ease because it could afford to. Walrus optimizes for endurance because it has to. In a world shaped by AI and onchain systems that demand long term data durability, that focus on survival may determine what truly lasts.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
AWS thrives on endless scale and over provisioning. Walrus cannot rely on that. Instead, it uses erasure coding through its Red Stuff design to achieve roughly four to five times redundancy. That may sound high, but compared to the ten times or more full replication many decentralized systems require for real durability, it is far more efficient.
That overhead buys statistical resilience. Data can still be reconstructed even if a large portion of nodes disappear. These failure scenarios have been stress tested, and the underlying math has proven reliable.
Storage is prepaid in fixed epochs rather than billed through monthly metering. This places risk directly on the protocol’s design and keeps incentives tight. There is no room for growth fueled subsidies like those centralized providers relied on for years.
In early 2026, decentralized storage is attracting serious capital. Walrus raised around 140 million dollars from major backers including Standard Crypto and a16z crypto, reaching a valuation near 2 billion dollars. This was not driven by hype but by the goal of delivering reliable data availability without bloated overhead.
The contrast is clear. AWS optimized for ease because it could afford to. Walrus optimizes for endurance because it has to. In a world shaped by AI and onchain systems that demand long term data durability, that focus on survival may determine what truly lasts.
@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #walrus
Vyloučení odpovědnosti: Obsahuje názory třetích stran. Nejedná se o finanční poradenství. Může obsahovat sponzorovaný obsah. Viz obchodní podmínky.