What stands out to me about @Bedrock 2.0 is that it seems to be solving a different problem than most BTCFi projects.
A lot of protocols spend their time trying to find the next source of yield. Bedrock appears to be asking a bigger question: what happens when the source of yield changes?
That's the part I find interesting.
Bitcoin capital is becoming larger, more patient, and more selective. The highest APY is not always the destination anymore. Capital tends to move toward systems that can adapt when market conditions shift.
That is why the move toward uniBTC and a modular vault framework caught my attention. Instead of depending on a single strategy, the idea is to create a structure where Bitcoin can be routed across different opportunities as they emerge. In a way, the infrastructure becomes more important than the yield itself.
The real advantage may not be generating the highest return during the best month. It may be remaining useful during the difficult months when most strategies stop working.
Quick thoughts?
• APY or adaptability?
• Yield or infrastructure?