Is Vanar actually easier for newcomers than Ethereum?
I tend to see Vanar Chain as a Layer 1 designed with onboarding in mind — smoother wallets, simpler login, streamlined fees, and an overall experience where users don’t need to understand much to get started. Compared to Ethereum, the surface-level experience definitely feels more polished and approachable.
But that always brings me back to the deeper question: what trade-offs were made to achieve that smoothness?
Who runs the infrastructure?
Who controls the multisig upgrades?
Is there a pause mechanism?
If the sequencer or validator fails, do users have a permissionless way to exit, or must they wait for an entity to step in?
Under stress scenarios — a bank run, oracle failure, severe congestion — how long does it take to withdraw? Is the exit path dependent on a bridge or centralized operator?
Ethereum may be harder to use, but its trust assumptions and exit mechanisms have been battle-tested over multiple cycles. Users custody their own keys, initiate their own withdrawals, and accept complexity and fees in exchange for autonomy.
So if you choose Vanar for convenience, the real question is: where exactly are you placing your trust — and on the worst possible day, can you still exit on your own?
