cryptocomparison

The narrative of "Ethereum killers" has evolved. Since Ethereum's landmark transition to Proof-of-Stake (The Merge), the competitive landscape has crystallized into a study of trade-offs. As of 2025, it's no longer a simple question of which blockchain is better, but which is better for what purpose. While Ethereum solidifies its role as the decentralized backbone of high-value finance, Solana has captured the lead in user activity and transaction volume.
This article breaks down the post-merge rivalry, analyzing both chains through the lenses of technology, adoption, and future potential.

Core Philosophies: Divergent Designs
The fundamental difference lies in their architectural priorities.
Ethereum is built for maximum security and decentralization. Its modular design prioritizes a robust, censorship-resistant base layer (Layer 1), delegating scalability to a growing ecosystem of Layer 2 rollups like Arbitrum and Optimism. This approach has resulted in the most decentralized smart-contract network, with over 700,000 validators securing the chain.
Solana is engineered for maximum speed and throughput. It employs a unique hybrid consensus model combining Proof-of-Stake with Proof-of-History (PoH), allowing it to process transactions in parallel. This design aims to deliver a single, ultra-fast global state machine.
Technical Face-Off: Performance vs. Provenance
The differing philosophies manifest in stark technical contrasts.
Transaction Speed & Cost:
· Solana: Processes 3,000-5,000 real-world transactions per second (TPS) with average fees of $0.00025.

· Ethereum: Handles about 30 TPS on its base layer, with fees ranging from $5 to over $50 during congestion. Its Layer 2 solutions bring costs down to between $0.10 and $1.00.
Decentralization & Security:
· Ethereum: Leads with over 700,000 validators and has maintained zero downtime since 2016.
· Solana: Operates with approximately 1,500 validators. It achieved 99.9% uptime in 2024-2025, marking significant improvement after historical outages.
Development & Ecosystem:
· Ethereum: Hosts the largest ecosystem with over 4,000 dApps, $166 billion in Total Value Locked (TVL), and the deep liquidity of foundational DeFi protocols like Uniswap and Aave.
· Solana: Features a younger but explosively growing ecosystem of 500+ dApps with over $8 billion in TVL. It frequently processes over 50% of all global DEX volume.
2025: A Year of Institutionalization and Growth
Both chains reached critical milestones in 2025, expanding their reach and use cases.
Solana's Breakout Year:
· ETF Approval & Institutional On-Ramp: The approval of U.S. spot Solana ETFs was a landmark, collectively gathering over $747 million in assets under management and fundamentally changing SOL's liquidity profile.
· Dominance in Real-World Assets (RWA): Solana emerged as a leading chain for tokenization, hosting BlackRock's BUIDL fund and seeing its stablecoin supply grow to nearly $17 billion.
· Infrastructure Leap with Firedancer: The mainnet launch of the Firedancer validator client marked the end of Solana's "mainnet beta" phase, promising enhanced robustness and paving the way for future performance gains.
Ethereum's Year of Consolidation:
· Institutional Validation: Over 200 companies allocated to ETH treasuries, and Ethereum ETFs helped drive institutional holding of over 10 million ETH (worth ~$46 billion) by mid-2025.
· Layer 2 Maturation: Networks like Linea demonstrated that Ethereum L2s could match standalone chain performance without sacrificing security. Over 35.7 million ETH (29.8% of supply) is now staked, reinforcing network security.
· Mainstream Bridge: Products like the MetaMask Card, which allows direct spending from self-custody wallets, brought Ethereum-based DeFi into daily financial life.
Investment Perspective: Two Compelling Theses
The choice between Ethereum and Solana often aligns with an investor's time horizon and risk tolerance.
The Ethereum Investment Thesis is built on long-term, foundational value:
· Pros: Unmatched security and decentralization, proven institutional adoption, regulatory clarity as a commodity, and a deflationary supply mechanism post-EIP-1559.
· Cons: High base-layer fees, slower transaction finality, and complexity for new users. Analysts also note systemic risks, such as validator centralization around clients like Prysm and economic pressures from falling staking yields.
The Solana Investment Thesis leverages short-term momentum and technological edge:
· Pros: Massive speed and cost advantages, explosive user and developer growth, dominance in high-frequency use cases like trading and NFTs, and a series of successful ecosystem launches.
· Cons: A less battle-tested security model, concerns over validator centralization, and regulatory questions. Its price has also shown high volatility, dropping over 30% in 2025 despite leading in usage metrics.
A Direct Comparison of Key Metrics (2025)
To summarize the current state,here is a snapshot of how both networks compare across critical dimensions:
Metric Ethereum Solana
Core Priority Security & Decentralization Speed & Throughput
Transaction Speed ~30 TPS (Base Layer) 3,000-5,000 TPS
Avg. Transaction Cost $5 - $50+ (Base Layer) ~$0.00025
Validators 700,000 ~1,500
DeFi TVL ~$166 Billion ~$8 Billion
2025 Narrative Institutional & L2 Growth ETFs, RWAs & Retail Adoption
The Road Ahead: Coexistence, Not Conquest
The future is not winner-takes-all but multi-chain. Both networks have clear 2026 priorities that reinforce their core identities.

· Ethereum's Roadmap focuses on Danksharding for massive data availability scaling, account abstraction for better user experience, and continued enhancements to validator efficiency and consensus.
· Solana's Roadmap is driving forward with wider adoption of its Firedancer client, the Alpenglow consensus upgrade to reduce latency, and expansion of its mobile and hardware ecosystem with the Solana Seeker phone.
Final Verdict
The "Solana vs. Ethereum" debate post-merge reveals a market maturing and specializing. Ethereum is the settlement layer of choice for high-value, security-critical applications—the bedrock of institutional DeFi and tokenized assets. Solana is the performance chain of choice for consumer-scale applications—the home of high-frequency trading, micro-transactions, and viral social experiences.
For investors and builders, the strategic takeaway is alignment with use case. A diversified approach that recognizes Ethereum's sovereign resilience and Solana's disruptive speed may be the most prudent path forward in a multi-chain future.
Note: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.
#Solana #Ethereum #EthereumMerge #CryptoComparison #DeFi
$BTC
$ETH
$SOL

Podívej, rozumím tomu. Všichni spojují SUI a SEI dohromady, jako by byli dvojčata oddělená při narození. Oba byly spuštěny přibližně ve stejnou dobu, oba slibují bleskové rychlosti, oba zachytily vlny hype. Ale po důkladném zkoumání skutečných čísel? Tihle dva ani nehrají stejnou hru.
Dovol mi, abych rozebral, co jsem našel, když jsem je skutečně porovnal vedle sebe.
Příběh dvou L1
SUI byl spuštěn v květnu 2023 a prezentuje se jako sofistikovaná infrastruktura - navržena pro DeFi, platby a celý ekosystém chytrých kontraktů. Je navržena tak, aby zvládla vážný průchod bez potíží.

15/10/2025 HEMI Článek #07

Arbitrum a Optimism vedou v přijetí, zk-rollupy jsou v závodě o důvěryhodnost. Hemi se odlišuje anchoringem Bitcoin a nativní programovatelností BTC.

Úvod: Tabulka bodů वाली दौड़

V IPL každý tým dělá runs, ale skutečný příběh se objevuje v tabulce bodů a net run rate. Stejný scénář je i v kryptoměnovém L2 prostoru. Každý protokol tvrdí, že má škálovatelnost a levný plyn, ale skutečný rozdíl je v přijetí, bezpečnostním modelu a důvěře developerů.