bitcoinonly

You are watching a market where conviction whispers and leverage shouts. We will trace how Bitcoin fell toward sixty thousand dollars, how forced exits erased hundreds of millions in positions, and why the rebound above sixty five thousand dollars may say less about belief and more about fragile structure.
You feel the paradox immediately: the same crowd that sells in fear can buy in urgency, and both acts can be driven by the same mechanism. In Asia on Friday, Bitcoin rebounded sharply after a fresh wave of selling pushed it down toward sixty thousand dollars, extending a drawdown that has carried the largest cryptocurrency to more than half below its October peak.
Now observe the sequence, because sequences reveal causation. Bitcoin fell as much as four point eight percent to around sixty thousand thirty three dollars during late United States hours, and then snapped back as high as sixty five thousand nine hundred twenty six dollars. This followed Thursday’s thirteen percent slide, its steepest one day drop since November of twenty twenty two, when the collapse of Sam Bankman Fried’s F T X catalyzed a panic that did not ask who was careful and who was reckless.
Here is our first mid course question for you: when price moves this violently, are you seeing new knowledge enter the market, or old positions being mechanically unwound? The bounce arrived as liquidations surged again, sweeping away leveraged positions that had accumulated during the week’s decline. In other words, many participants were not choosing freely in that moment; their earlier choices had already written the script.
The numbers tell a human story of commitment made under uncertainty, then revoked under constraint. Roughly seven hundred million dollars in crypto bets were wiped out over the past four hours, according to CoinGlass. About five hundred thirty million dollars came from long positions, and about one hundred seventy million dollars from shorts, suggesting a familiar pattern: traders were first crushed on the way down, then caught leaning the wrong way on the rebound.
And yet you also notice something quieter beneath the machinery. The move appears to have drawn in spot buyers, with sixty thousand dollars acting as a psychological line watched for weeks. This is not mysticism. Round numbers become coordination points because human attention is scarce, and crowds economize on thinking by using simple focal anchors.
Damien Loh, chief investment officer at Ericsenz Capital, described the rebound as evidence of strong support around that level, while warning that sentiment remains fragile given the broader market backdrop. We can translate this into plain logic: even if buyers exist at sixty thousand dollars, their willingness to persist depends on what they believe will happen next, and on whether they are funding those beliefs with real savings or borrowed time.
Let us widen the lens, because the same structure repeats across related assets. Altcoins mirrored Bitcoin’s whipsaw. Solana fell as much as fourteen percent at one point, then erased those losses within hours. When liquidity thins, small imbalances become large moves, and forced selling can replace deliberate exchange with something closer to evacuation.
Here is the second hook to hold onto: when many traders must act at once, price stops being a calm messenger and becomes a siren. The broader crypto market has been shaky since a series of liquidations in October rattled confidence, and the latest drawdown has been amplified by turbulence in global markets, where investors have been dumping speculative assets. In such moments, correlation rises not because the assets became identical, but because the same kind of holder is trying to exit the same kind of risk.
Then the consequences spill outward, as they always do when balance sheets are tied to volatile valuations. Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, reported a twelve point four billion dollars fourth quarter net loss on Thursday, driven by mark to market declines in its Bitcoin holdings. You see the chain: a price drop is not merely a chart event; it becomes a constraint on future action for firms whose plans were built on yesterday’s valuations.
So even with Friday’s bounce, traders say the market still looks like one pushed around by leverage rather than conviction. We can state it more generally for you: when borrowing dominates, the marginal buyer is not the patient saver but the fragile speculator, and the market’s tone becomes jumpy because the weakest hands set the next transaction.
Now we pause together, because the lesson is not about any single price level. It is about structure. A rebound can be real and still be mechanical, and a sell off can be loud and still contain little new information. If you want to understand what you are seeing, ask a simple question each time the chart jolts: who is choosing, and who is being forced?
If this way of tracing action through incentives clarifies what looked like chaos, hold onto it and tell us what part of the sequence you think mattered most.
#Bitcoin
#BTC
#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinCommunity
#BitcoinNews

You are watching a strange pairing unfold: a flood of trading at the very moment confidence seems to drain away. We will trace what this combination usually means in human action record volume, steady redemptions, and a sudden preference for protection can quietly reveal the psychology of peak selling.
You and we both know trading can look like energy. But reason asks a sharper question: is this energy the pursuit of gain, or the escape from pain?
On Thursday, BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin exchange traded fund known by the ticker I B I T printed a record that feels almost unreal. More than two hundred eighty four million shares changed hands, according to Nasdaq data. In notional terms, that is over ten billion dollars of value being passed from one set of hands to another.
Now pause with us and notice what a record truly is. It is not merely a statistic. It is a moment when many individuals, each with their own plans and fears, converge on the same action at once.
To see the scale, compare it to the prior high of one hundred sixty nine point two one million shares on November twenty first. The jump was about one hundred sixty nine percent. When activity expands that quickly, it rarely does so for calm reasons.
Here is the tension: the volume surged while the price fell. I B I T dropped about thirteen percent to under thirty five dollars, the lowest since October eleventh, twenty twenty four. The year to date decline extended to about twenty seven percent. And the earlier peak, around seventy one point eight two dollars in early October, now reads less like a milestone and more like a memory people are trying to emotionally price against.
This is where human action becomes legible. When prices rise, many trade to participate. When prices fall sharply, many trade to stop the bleeding. The same act, buying or selling, can be driven by opposite purposes.
The fund also processed redemptions totaling about one hundred seventy five point three three million dollars on Thursday. That was roughly forty percent of the cumulative net outflow of about four hundred thirty four point one one million dollars across eleven funds, according to SoSoValue. Redemption is not just movement on a screen. It is the choice to exit, to convert an uncertain holding into something felt as safer, clearer, more controllable.
And remember what this vehicle is. I B I T is the largest publicly listed Bitcoin fund of its kind. It holds the underlying coins and is designed to mirror the spot price of Bitcoin itself. It has served as a preferred route for institutions that want exposure through regulated products. In other words, it is a bridge for cautious capital to approach a volatile asset without stepping directly onto the open terrain.
So when that bridge sees record traffic during a drop, reason asks you to consider what kind of traveler dominates the crowd. Are they arriving with patience, or leaving with urgency?
Bitcoin itself fell sharply as well, sliding to nearly sixty thousand dollars on Thursday. When the underlying asset breaks downward and the most widely used institutional wrapper sees both heavy turnover and redemptions, the pattern often aligns with what traders call capitulation. We can translate that into plain human terms: long term holders deciding that enduring further uncertainty costs more than realizing a loss today.
Here is the paradox that confuses many observers. The most intense activity often appears near the end of a selling wave, not because certainty returns, but because exhaustion finally overpowers hope. People do not merely respond to prices. They respond to the emotional weight of time spent being wrong.
This is why record volume paired with a price crash can mark what some call peak selling. Not a guaranteed bottom, but the phase where the marginal seller becomes less a speculator and more someone surrendering a position they once justified with conviction.
Midway through this, another signal spoke in the language of hedging. Options trading in I B I T showed a pronounced tilt toward longer duration put options, contracts used to protect against further declines. Those puts reached a record premium, more than twenty five volatility points above call options, according to MarketChameleon. In calm times, protection is cheap because few feel they need it. In fearful times, protection becomes expensive because many suddenly agree they cannot endure another surprise.
Notice what that implies. The crowd is not merely selling. The crowd is paying up to insure itself against more pain. That is not optimism searching for opportunity. That is uncertainty being priced, urgently.
But we must keep our minds disciplined. None of this guarantees an immediate reversal. Bear markets can persist longer than even confident dip buyers can remain solvent. Time, not opinion, is the ultimate constraint. A person can be right about value and still be forced out by liquidity.
So let us end where reason prefers to end: with what we can truly know from the pattern of action. Record volume, meaningful redemptions, and expensive downside protection often reveal a market wrestling with capitulation. It is the moment when many participants stop asking, “How high can it go,” and start asking, “How much more can I endure.”
If you have ever felt that shift in yourself in any decision, not only in markets, you already understand the structure beneath the data. And if you want, leave your own reading of this moment in a sentence or two, so we can compare how different minds interpret the same visible acts.
#Bitcoin
#BTC
#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinCommunity
#BitcoinNews

We are watching a familiar human pattern: people fear a future machine they cannot yet touch, while forgetting the quiet strength of a network that adapts through voluntary coordination. In this reflection, we will walk through Strategy’s latest remarks and deduce what they reveal about incentives, uncertainty, and the practical art of preparing without panicking.
You and we both know that every tool begins as theory, then becomes a constraint, then becomes a choice. Quantum computing is now crossing that threshold from abstract possibility into long term strategic consideration, and Strategy made it plain that it prefers to act before pressure forces action, as it spoke during its fourth quarter earnings call on Thursday.
Notice the logic of their position. If you hold a large reserve of Bitcoin, you are not merely holding an asset; you are holding exposure to the integrity of a monetary network. And so Strategy, described as the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, says it plans to initiate a Bitcoin security program meant to coordinate with the global cyber, crypto, and Bitcoin security community.
Here we meet the first paradox that matters. Quantum risk is discussed as if it were a sudden cliff, yet engineering reality tends to move by gradients. Strategy addressed the growing conversation and reaffirmed commitment to Bitcoin security, framing quantum not as an immediate threat, but as a future engineering challenge the network can prepare for.
Now let us not look away from the conflict that markets always surface. Strategy reported a net loss of twelve point four billion dollars for the quarter. Shares fell seventeen percent on the day, trading as low as one hundred four dollars, and yet attention quickly migrated toward what Michael Saylor chose to emphasize.
Ask yourself why. Losses and price declines are visible, but the deeper question is always about coordination under uncertainty. Saylor revisited a long list of historical Bitcoin fear, uncertainty, and doubt, reminding you that the network has already absorbed many alleged fatal blows, and he placed quantum concerns into that same category of claims that deserve analysis rather than reflex.
But we should be precise here, because reason does not dismiss risk by calling it fear. Saylor also acknowledged that quantum deserves serious long term planning. That single phrase is the hinge: not denial, not panic, but preparation grounded in time horizons.
Strategy then outlined key points on quantum computing, predicting that quantum technology is likely more than a decade away, and pointing out that the Bitcoin community is already researching quantum resistant cryptography. Do you see what this implies? When knowledge is dispersed, security is not a decree; it is an ongoing process of discovery, testing, and adoption, driven by those who bear the consequences.
And here is a quieter mid course question we should hold up to the light: if the threat is not immediate, why speak of it now? Because prudent actors do not wait for certainty to begin planning. They wait only long enough to avoid wasting scarce effort on fantasies, and then they invest in options that keep the future open.
By the end of the sequence, the market itself offered a small epilogue. Shares were up six percent in pre market trading as Bitcoin rebounded to sixty five thousand dollars. Price movements, as always, are not verdicts on truth; they are snapshots of shifting expectations.
Let us pause together on what was actually revealed. Quantum uncertainty is real in the way all future uncertainty is real: it is not a prophecy, it is a constraint that may arrive. The deeper lesson is that resilient systems do not survive by pretending the world stands still, and they do not survive by surrendering to every imagined catastrophe. They survive by letting many minds prepare, coordinate, and revise.
If you find yourself thinking through how a monetary network earns trust across decades, hold onto that question and carry it into your next conversation. It tends to reveal more than you expect when you let it sit quietly.
#Bitcoin
#BTC
#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinCommunity
#BitcoinNews

You and we both know a transfer is never just a transfer. It is an action, chosen under uncertainty, and the market treats it as a clue. Here, we follow MARA moving one thousand three hundred eighteen Bitcoin across trading desks and custody venues, and we ask what the timing reveals about pressure, calculation, and the thin line between routine management and forced selling.
You might think the market moves on price alone, yet watch what happens when coins move instead of candles. In anxious conditions, the same on chain motion can be read as either calm treasury housekeeping or the first crack in a balance sheet.
Over the past ten hours, Bitcoin miner MARA shifted one thousand three hundred eighteen Bitcoin, valued around eighty six point eight nine million dollars, to a mix of counterparties and custody destinations, as tracked by on chain data observed by Arkham. We begin with the simple fact: coins left one set of hands and entered another set of addresses. But the meaning lives in why.
The largest portion traveled to Two Prime, a credit and trading firm. One transfer sent six hundred fifty three point seven seven three Bitcoin, roughly forty two point zero one million dollars, to an address tagged to Two Prime, and then, minutes later, a smaller addition followed: eight point nine nine nine Bitcoin, about five hundred seventy eight thousand dollars. You can feel the market’s mind here, because it immediately asks whether this is preparation to sell, or preparation to borrow, or preparation to reposition.
Other outflows went elsewhere. Two separate transactions sent two hundred Bitcoin and ninety nine point nine nine nine Bitcoin to an address tagged to BitGo, together worth about twenty point four million dollars at the time. Another three hundred five Bitcoin moved to a fresh address, valued around twenty point seven two million dollars. On the surface, this looks like dispersion. Under the surface, it is a portfolio being arranged for optionality.
Now we reach the real reason anyone cares: timing. Crypto markets have been swinging sharply since a liquidation driven selloff earlier this week, and traders are tense for any hint that miners are becoming forced sellers. When fear is high, observers stop asking, “What is typical?” and start asking, “What is necessary?”
Large miner related transfers can be ordinary treasury management, custody reshuffling, collateral movements, or preparation for an over the counter sale. Yet in a thin market, they are often interpreted as a supply signal. This is the paradox you must hold: the same action can be prudent internal accounting, and still alter expectations externally, because expectations themselves are a traded asset.
Notice why the Two Prime portion draws the brightest spotlight. A credit and trading counterparty suggests strategies beyond simple storage. If the Bitcoin is being posted as collateral, or rotated into a structured approach, it does not automatically imply spot selling. But you can see why the market watches it anyway: credit links the coin to leverage, and leverage links the coin to forced decisions when prices fall.
All of this arrives during a difficult stretch for miners. Bitcoin is down nearly fifty percent from peak prices above one hundred twenty six thousand dollars last year. When revenue falls but fixed obligations remain, the miner’s freedom narrows, and the market becomes obsessed with whether they will liquidate inventory to survive.
We can sharpen the pressure further. Bitcoin is now about twenty percent below its estimated average production cost, as reported on Thursday by CoinDesk, increasing financial strain across the Bitcoin mining sector. Here, the logic is simple and unforgiving: when the selling price sits below the cost of creation, the producer must either endure losses, find cheaper inputs, or reduce operations.
Data from Checkonchain places the average cost to mine one Bitcoin around eighty seven thousand dollars, while the spot price has fallen toward a weekly low near sixty thousand dollars. Historically, trading below production cost has been a feature of bear market conditions. Not because it is “normal,” but because it is the market’s way of forcing reallocation toward those who can best endure scarcity.
So when you see MARA’s coins move, do not ask only, “Will they sell?” Ask the deeper question: “What constraints are tightening, and what options are being purchased with this movement?” In a world of uncertainty, liquidity is not merely cash. Liquidity is the ability to choose.
If you find yourself rereading these transfers with a calmer eye, that is the point. The chain shows motion, but reason reveals structure, and once you see the structure, you start noticing it everywhere. If you want, leave your own interpretation of what this pattern most likely signals, and we will test it against the logic of action.
#Bitcoin
#BTC
#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinCommunity
#BitcoinNews

Právě jsi sledoval násilné odvíjení, které vymazalo dvě miliardy a šest set milionů dolarů v pákových sázkách, stlačilo Bitcoin na šedesát tisíc dolarů a nechalo celý trh roztažený do extrémně přeprodaného území. Nyní otázka není, zda došlo k bolesti, ale co ta bolest odhaluje o tom, jak křehká koordinace se stává, když si mnoho lidí půjčuje stejnou přesvědčení.
Cítil jsi to, že? Podivný kontrast mezi jistotou a křehkostí.
Protože na spekulativních trzích důvěra často roste právě ve chvíli, kdy odolnost tiše mizí.

We are going to watch a single choice unfold inside a broader rout and you will see something quiet but decisive: when the market punishes an entire category, the real action is not panic, it is reallocation under uncertainty.
You might think a falling market makes everyone do the same thing, yet the truth is the opposite: the same price drop can compel one person to exit and another to enter, because each acts from a different plan and a different sense of time.
On a Thursday shaped by a broad decline in crypto related equities, ARK Invest reduced its position in Coinbase and increased its position in Bullish, shifting capital while the crowd was still reacting to the fall.
ARK Invest sold roughly seventeen point four million dollars worth of Coinbase shares and bought a similar amount of Bullish shares, right as the market was routing crypto equities and compressing valuations across the board.
Let us start from the only solid ground: you act to replace a less preferred state with a more preferred one. When prices fall, nothing mystical happens. What changes is the menu of trade offs, and every portfolio becomes a fresh set of decisions about what to hold and what to release.
ARK Invest sold one hundred nineteen thousand two hundred thirty six shares of Coinbase, valued around seventeen point four million dollars at the close. Coinbase fell about thirteen point three percent on the day, closing near one hundred forty six dollars and twelve cents, while the broader crypto market continued sliding.
Now notice the deeper signal the price system is sending you. The fall is not merely a number on a screen. It is a public message that many plans, at once, are being revised. Some are forced to liquidate. Some are choosing to wait. Some are searching for a better fit between today’s prices and tomorrow’s expectations.
In the same breath, ARK bought seven hundred sixteen thousand thirty shares of Bullish, disclosed by email, valued around seventeen point eight million dollars based on a closing price near twenty four dollars and ninety cents. Bullish itself fell about eight point five percent on the day.
Here is the paradox that wakes you up: in a downturn, the headlines make it sound as if risk is being rejected. But in reality, risk is being repriced, and repricing is exactly what invites entrepreneurial judgment back into the room.
It is common to see ARK make sizeable purchases of crypto adjacent companies when prices slide with the broader market. If you manage a portfolio with a particular thesis, a downturn is not only pain, it is also information and an opportunity to rebalance toward what you now judge to be undervalued relative to alternatives.
But we should not glide past the unusual part. It is rarer to see this window used to offload shares in a major crypto holding such as Coinbase while simultaneously adding exposure elsewhere in the same ecosystem.
So ask yourself what this implies. It does not imply certainty. It implies preference. It implies that, at these new prices, ARK judged Bullish to offer a better alignment with its plan than an additional unit of Coinbase did, even though both were being dragged down by the same wave of selling.
Midway through this reasoning, pause with us and look again at what you just witnessed. A “crypto rout” is not one event. It is millions of separate actions, each person trying to restore coherence between their expectations and their holdings, with prices acting as the shared language that makes coordination possible.
And this is why the market looks chaotic from afar but becomes intelligible up close. When you see selling and buying in the same storm, you are seeing the real function of prices: they do not soothe you, they inform you.
We can end on a quiet recognition. The story is not that one firm sold and another asset was bought. The story is that falling prices did what they always do in a free process: they forced choices to become explicit.
If you have ever rethought a purchase after the price changed, you already understand the whole mechanism. If you want, leave the single detail that most changed your view, and we will trace its logic together.
#Bitcoin
#BTC
#BitcoinOnly
#BitcoinCommunity
#BitcoinNews

Sledujete, jak se dva světy pohybují současně: svět zklamaných předpovědí a svět obnovené měnové důvěry. Budeme sledovat, jak mohou výpadky výnosů ochladit nadšení pro umělou inteligenci, zatímco obnovení Bitcoinu může povznést celý klastr podniků s ním spojených.
Můžete si myslet, že zpráva o výnosech je jen skóre, ale ve skutečnosti je to okamžik ekonomického výpočtu zveřejněný na veřejnosti. Když IREN hlásí výsledky pod tím, co pozorovatelé očekávali, vidíte propast mezi plány a realitou, mezi podnikatelskými sliby a disciplinou zisku a ztráty.

ETH SOL XRP = FAKE HYPE 🔥💀 Samson Mow právě odhalil PRAVDU, kterou nechtějí, abyste věděli 🚨
Bitcoin je KRÁL 👑
Všechno ostatní = hluk 📢
Samson Mow ⚔️ CEO JAN3 právě přešel do plného divokého módu proti Ethereu 🧪 XRP 💦 a Solaně 🪙
Nazval je PŘEHODNOCENÉM ODPADKEM 🗑️ v porovnání s omezenou bestií, kterou je BTC 🚀
Pojďme to rozebrat 👇
Můžete koupit 1 z 21 milionů BTC za 85K $ 💸
Ale pokud použijete stejnou logiku fixní nabídky na altcoiny 🧠
Tady je to, co Samson spočítal 🧾💣

Investiční firma Ego Death Capital právě získala $100M—ale neoznačujte to za „jen další fond.“ Jdou pouze Bitcoin($BTC )-ově, podporují stavitele, ne držitele sázek. ⚒️

💬 „S Bitcoinem zacházíme jako s infrastrukturou—něčím, na čem se dá stavět, ne na čem se dá spekulovat,“ řekl GP Lyn Alden. To je skutečná víra. 🧱

🔍 Tady je to, co financují:

🔐 Relai – Aplikace pro sebeobsluhu Bitcoinů

🏛️ Roxom – Burza cenných papírů postavená na $BTC

💡 Co dál? Projekty řešící skutečné problémy se skutečnými $BTC železnicemi.

Bitcoin flirtuje s ATH, zatímco tvoje oblíbené altcoiny prosí o pulz. Celý časový rámec tleská, jako by to všichni zvládli—ale buďme realističtí...

Jak se ti drží tvé alt mince, šampione?

ETH? Bojuje víc než meme coiny, aby překonalo 2,5K dolarů.
SOL? Dolů o 50 % od vrcholu—ale aspoň tento týden zůstalo online!
SAND, ENJ, VET, NEAR, SHIB, PEPE? Uvízli v časové smyčce do roku 2022.

Ale jo, „to je akumulace,“ ne trest… že?

Alt kultisté to říkají:

„Ty nerozumíš technologii“