From my perspective, Bitcoin’s current cost-basis structure is clearly signaling an active holder shakeout phase within this cycle. This is not random volatility or purely sentiment-driven price action—it’s a structurally driven reset that is unfolding across multiple holder cohorts. On-chain data consistently shows that periods like this tend to separate weak hands from conviction capital, and the present setup fits that pattern closely.
Short-Term Holders: Forced Decisions and Weak-Hand Capitulation
Starting with Short-Term Holders (STHs), the stress is unmistakable. At current price levels, nearly the entire STH cohort is underwater, as Bitcoin continues to trade below the average acquisition price of coins held for less than 155 days. With the STH realized price sitting near the $92K region, this group is now facing a binary choice: either dollar-cost average into weakness or exit positions at a realized loss.
Historically, this is the exact environment where emotional and leverage-heavy participants are flushed out. STHs are typically more reactive to price movements, narrative shifts, and short-term momentum. When price falls below their aggregate cost basis, selling pressure tends to accelerate—not because fundamentals have changed, but because risk tolerance collapses. This process, while uncomfortable, is essential for market health. Weak-hand supply must be transferred to stronger holders before sustainable upside can resume.
This behavior aligns with prior cycle drawdowns where STH capitulation marked late-stage corrective phases rather than true cycle tops. The market is effectively purging speculative excess accumulated during the prior expansion.
Younger Long-Term Holders: The Market’s Stress Test
The next cohort under pressure is the younger segment of Long-Term Holders—specifically those holding BTC for 6–12 months and 12–18 months. These investors typically represent capital that entered during mid-to-late bull market conditions. They are more patient than STHs, but not yet battle-tested across full macro cycles.
Currently, both of these cohorts are trading below their realized prices. This shift is critical. When younger LTHs move from profit into loss, the market transitions from accumulation into what can best be described as a stress test phase. Confidence begins to erode, narratives turn defensive, and conviction is challenged.
If this group begins distributing aggressively, it would signal something more serious than a routine reset. Heavy selling from the 6–18 month cohort historically aligns with deeper cycle-level damage and extended consolidation phases. That said, distribution has not yet accelerated to dangerous levels, which suggests that this cohort is still largely holding rather than panicking.
The $63,654 Level: Structural On-Chain Support
The most important level I am watching sits at $63,654—the realized price of the 18-month to 2-year holder cohort. This group represents experienced market participants who have already endured prior volatility and are statistically less likely to sell impulsively. Their cost basis often functions as a structural support zone during late-cycle corrections.
On-chain, this level acts as a gravity well. When price approaches it, long-term conviction capital historically steps in to defend positions. These holders tend to view drawdowns not as exit signals, but as opportunities to reinforce exposure. As a result, price reactions around this zone carry far more informational value than typical chart-based support levels.
As long as Bitcoin remains above this threshold, the broader structure remains intact. Price weakness under these conditions should be interpreted as a necessary reset—clearing leverage, resetting funding rates, and redistributing supply—rather than a breakdown of the macro bull thesis.
SOPR and Holding-Time Distribution: Confirmation Signals
Spent Output Profit Ratio (SOPR) data further supports this interpretation. STH SOPR has already compressed, indicating that short-term sellers are realizing losses and that much of the forced selling has likely already occurred. This is a classic sign of late-stage capitulation rather than early-stage downside.
At the same time, holding-time distribution remains relatively stable. There is no significant spike in older coin movement, which would indicate panic from long-term holders. This stability suggests that the market is absorbing selling pressure without triggering a broader loss of confidence among experienced participants.
This divergence—STHs capitulating while LTHs remain composed—is precisely what one would expect during a healthy correction within a larger uptrend.
Market Context and Forward Scenarios
Zooming out, it’s important to frame this move within the broader market structure. Bitcoin has already gone through a strong expansion phase this cycle, and corrections of this magnitude are not only normal but necessary. Markets do not move in straight lines, especially after extended periods of upside momentum.
If BTC continues to hold above the $63K region, the probability increases that this phase will resolve into renewed accumulation and base-building. Volatility will compress, sellers will exhaust, and the market will gradually transition back into trend continuation mode.
However, a clean and sustained loss of the $63,654 level would change the conversation. That would imply that even experienced holders are beginning to feel pressure, opening the door to a deeper, panic-driven selloff. In that scenario, the market would likely enter a prolonged re-accumulation range rather than a quick recovery.
Conclusion
At present, the data points to a controlled shakeout rather than structural failure. Short-term excess has been flushed, younger holders are being tested, and long-term conviction remains largely intact. As uncomfortable as this phase may feel, it is often the price paid for the next leg of sustainable growth.
Bitcoin doesn’t reward impatience it rewards survival. This cycle is no different.
#Bitcoin #STH #LTH #BTC #RMJ_trades