Binance Square
Crypto Pulse Media
1.3k Posts

Crypto Pulse Media

Real-Time Crypto Market Intelligence Bitcoin • Altcoins • Web3 • Blockchain Global Coverage | Data-Driven Insights Crypto Pulse Media – Stay Ahead of the Market
3.6K+ Following
506 Followers
526 Liked
Posts
·
--
Article
The Truth About DTCC and XRP Ledger That’s Being MissedThe debate over the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and the $XRP Ledger has fueled bold claims, but according to market analyst MRCΛULIMΛN, both sides have overlooked the bigger picture. DTCC is neither migrating its entire infrastructure to the $XRP Ledger nor rejecting it. Instead, the organization is focused on modernizing capital markets through tokenization, integrating new technologies gradually via pilot programs, industry collaboration, interoperability testing, and phased production deployments. Within this transformation, Ripple has secured a seat at the table. Through Ripple Prime's participation in the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC), a DTCC subsidiary, and its role in DTCC's Digital Assets Tokenization Working Group, Ripple is contributing to discussions shaping the future of tokenized securities alongside major banks, asset managers, and market infrastructure providers. MRCΛULIMΛN likens DTCC to Wall Street's highway system, an essential backbone that processes trillions of dollars in securities transactions. In this analogy, blockchain networks such as the $XRP Ledger are emerging technologies designed to connect with and enhance existing infrastructure over time, not replace it overnight. MRCΛULIMΛN assessment underscores how institutional adoption typically unfolds. Financial market infrastructure evolves through years of technical validation, regulatory alignment, standards development, and incremental implementation rather than sweeping announcements. This view echoes crypto researcher SMQKE, who has consistently identified real-world asset (RWA) tokenization as one of finance's most significant long-term shifts. He recently highlighted DTCC's successful processing of live production trades involving DTC-tokenized assets as evidence that tokenization has progressed from experimentation to real-world deployment. Adding to this narrative, $XRP has recently been classified within DTCC's clearing and haircut framework. While this does not represent adoption of $XRP or XRPL as DTCC's settlement network, it does signal that $XRP has been incorporated into parts of the organization's risk management framework. Therefore, these developments reveal a more balanced reality. The story is not that DTCC has embraced or rejected XRPL, but that traditional financial infrastructure and blockchain technology are steadily converging through measured integration, interoperability, and tokenization-driven innovation. #quickfarm #EconomicAlert #yasirazam #TrendingTopic #Robertkiyosaki

The Truth About DTCC and XRP Ledger That’s Being Missed

The debate over the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) and the $XRP Ledger has fueled bold claims, but according to market analyst MRCΛULIMΛN, both sides have overlooked the bigger picture.
DTCC is neither migrating its entire infrastructure to the $XRP Ledger nor rejecting it. Instead, the organization is focused on modernizing capital markets through tokenization, integrating new technologies gradually via pilot programs, industry collaboration, interoperability testing, and phased production deployments.
Within this transformation, Ripple has secured a seat at the table. Through Ripple Prime's participation in the National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC), a DTCC subsidiary, and its role in DTCC's Digital Assets Tokenization Working Group, Ripple is contributing to discussions shaping the future of tokenized securities alongside major banks, asset managers, and market infrastructure providers.
MRCΛULIMΛN likens DTCC to Wall Street's highway system, an essential backbone that processes trillions of dollars in securities transactions.
In this analogy, blockchain networks such as the $XRP Ledger are emerging technologies designed to connect with and enhance existing infrastructure over time, not replace it overnight.
MRCΛULIMΛN assessment underscores how institutional adoption typically unfolds. Financial market infrastructure evolves through years of technical validation, regulatory alignment, standards development, and incremental implementation rather than sweeping announcements.
This view echoes crypto researcher SMQKE, who has consistently identified real-world asset (RWA) tokenization as one of finance's most significant long-term shifts.
He recently highlighted DTCC's successful processing of live production trades involving DTC-tokenized assets as evidence that tokenization has progressed from experimentation to real-world deployment.
Adding to this narrative, $XRP has recently been classified within DTCC's clearing and haircut framework. While this does not represent adoption of $XRP or XRPL as DTCC's settlement network, it does signal that $XRP has been incorporated into parts of the organization's risk management framework.
Therefore, these developments reveal a more balanced reality. The story is not that DTCC has embraced or rejected XRPL, but that traditional financial infrastructure and blockchain technology are steadily converging through measured integration, interoperability, and tokenization-driven innovation.
#quickfarm
#EconomicAlert
#yasirazam
#TrendingTopic
#Robertkiyosaki
Verified
Article
Why Is Sui's Approach to Storing Data On Chain Different From Most BlockchainsSui stores data as individual objects instead of tracking account balances, separating it from Ethereum, Solana, and most other blockchains. Each object carries its own ID, owner, and version history, letting the network process unrelated transactions at once instead of running everything through one shared ledger state. Ethereum and Solana use an account-based model, where the ledger tracks a balance tied to each wallet address. Every transaction touches that shared state, so the network processes transactions in strict order to avoid conflicts. Sui, built by Mysten Labs and launched on mainnet in May 2023, treats every asset, from a coin to an NFT to a smart contract package, as a distinct object with its own unique ID. Objects can be owned by one address, shared among multiple users, or marked immutable so no one can change them again. The practical effect is speed. A wallet-to-wallet transfer clears almost instantly, while an action touching a shared resource still waits for network agreement, similar to other chains. Sui prices storage differently than chains treating it as a one-time fee. Creating an object costs a fee upfront, split into a refundable deposit and a non-refundable portion, currently 1 percent, permanently removed from circulation. The refundable share sits in a storage fund until the object is deleted or shrunk, when up to 99 percent returns to whoever performed that transaction, even if they were not the original creator. The rebate exists because today's validators are not the ones who will store data years from now. On-chain objects suit account state and application logic, but not large files like images or AI training data. Walrus, a separate storage protocol also built by Mysten Labs, splits large files into encoded pieces distributed across storage nodes and referenced through the Sui ledger for verification. As of mid-July 2026, $SUI trades near $0.75, with a market cap around $3.0 billion, down roughly 86 percent from its all-time high of $5.35 in January 2025. A CoinStats analysis from late June 2026 estimated Sui's annualized network fee revenue at approximately $15 million, well below Ethereum and Solana's totals above $500 million each, and put monthly active user growth at roughly 10 million to 40 million this year, though that pairing comes from a single research source rather than multiple trackers. Analyst Michaël van de Poppe recently named $SUI among his top altcoin picks, citing early recovery signs. Sui's object-centric model processes unrelated transactions in parallel, settles simple transfers in under a second, and charges a storage fee that partially refunds itself when data is deleted. Shared objects still rely on consensus, and large files route through Walrus instead of staying fully on-chain. Together, these give Sui a genuinely different foundation for on-chain data than account-based blockchains. #pepe⚡ #Kriptocutrader #HotTrends #JohnCarl #gonnarich

Why Is Sui's Approach to Storing Data On Chain Different From Most Blockchains

Sui stores data as individual objects instead of tracking account balances, separating it from Ethereum, Solana, and most other blockchains. Each object carries its own ID, owner, and version history, letting the network process unrelated transactions at once instead of running everything through one shared ledger state.
Ethereum and Solana use an account-based model, where the ledger tracks a balance tied to each wallet address. Every transaction touches that shared state, so the network processes transactions in strict order to avoid conflicts.
Sui, built by Mysten Labs and launched on mainnet in May 2023, treats every asset, from a coin to an NFT to a smart contract package, as a distinct object with its own unique ID. Objects can be owned by one address, shared among multiple users, or marked immutable so no one can change them again.
The practical effect is speed. A wallet-to-wallet transfer clears almost instantly, while an action touching a shared resource still waits for network agreement, similar to other chains.
Sui prices storage differently than chains treating it as a one-time fee. Creating an object costs a fee upfront, split into a refundable deposit and a non-refundable portion, currently 1 percent, permanently removed from circulation.
The refundable share sits in a storage fund until the object is deleted or shrunk, when up to 99 percent returns to whoever performed that transaction, even if they were not the original creator. The rebate exists because today's validators are not the ones who will store data years from now.
On-chain objects suit account state and application logic, but not large files like images or AI training data. Walrus, a separate storage protocol also built by Mysten Labs, splits large files into encoded pieces distributed across storage nodes and referenced through the Sui ledger for verification.
As of mid-July 2026, $SUI trades near $0.75, with a market cap around $3.0 billion, down roughly 86 percent from its all-time high of $5.35 in January 2025.
A CoinStats analysis from late June 2026 estimated Sui's annualized network fee revenue at approximately $15 million, well below Ethereum and Solana's totals above $500 million each, and put monthly active user growth at roughly 10 million to 40 million this year, though that pairing comes from a single research source rather than multiple trackers.
Analyst Michaël van de Poppe recently named $SUI among his top altcoin picks, citing early recovery signs.
Sui's object-centric model processes unrelated transactions in parallel, settles simple transfers in under a second, and charges a storage fee that partially refunds itself when data is deleted.
Shared objects still rely on consensus, and large files route through Walrus instead of staying fully on-chain. Together, these give Sui a genuinely different foundation for on-chain data than account-based blockchains.
#pepe⚡
#Kriptocutrader
#HotTrends
#JohnCarl
#gonnarich
Article
Polygon’s payments push sparks POL backlash – ‘Holders have no equity’The community of Polygon holders is now pressing for clarity on whether the recent Polygon Labs profitability push will trickle down to them. One of the token holders, Just Hopmans, said, $POL, the native governance token in the Polygon ecosystem, was rebranded from MATIC in late 2024. During its debut, it surged to $1 before a massive crash to $0.06, or about a 93% drop in 2026. Despite the losses, $POL holders have surged 78% to over 245K in the past month. For Hopmans, clarity on how these holders will benefit from future Polygon payment profits would be worthwhile. He also sought details on how the community treasury, under the Polygon Foundation, will be handled after the transition. Hopmans claimed that Polygon Foundation, which oversees governance, moved over 50M $POL in H1 2026 without clear communication to the community. For Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron, the transition into a blockchain payment firm would ensure its profitability in 2027. As of writing, the project has yet to respond to Hopmans’ call for transparency and accountability to the community. That said, Polygon’s move was not surprising given its resilience in the competitive payments segment. The Ethereum L2 hit a record $106B in annual stablecoin transfer volume in 2025. So far in 2026, the volume is clocking $70B. This has been a growing trend since 2023, making it a key settlement layer for stablecoins, just like Ethereum, Tron, and Arbitrum. But in terms of market share, Polygon’s rising stablecoin volumes didn’t translate to increasing dominance. In fact, since 2023, its market share of the stablecoin settlement market has dropped from 1.54% to 0.72% in 2026. In other words, it has lost about half of its market share in an increasingly competitive segment. Over the same period, Solana [SOL] and Base have increased their market share from zero to 22% and 16%, respectively. It remains to be seen how the aggressive shifts to payments will bolster Polygon’s standings in the stablecoin settlement sector. #PEPEATH #LISTAAirdrop #MantaRWA #BitcoinDunyamiz #CryptoPatience

Polygon’s payments push sparks POL backlash – ‘Holders have no equity’

The community of Polygon holders is now pressing for clarity on whether the recent Polygon Labs profitability push will trickle down to them. One of the token holders, Just Hopmans, said,
$POL, the native governance token in the Polygon ecosystem, was rebranded from MATIC in late 2024. During its debut, it surged to $1 before a massive crash to $0.06, or about a 93% drop in 2026.
Despite the losses, $POL holders have surged 78% to over 245K in the past month. For Hopmans, clarity on how these holders will benefit from future Polygon payment profits would be worthwhile.
He also sought details on how the community treasury, under the Polygon Foundation, will be handled after the transition. Hopmans claimed that Polygon Foundation, which oversees governance, moved over 50M $POL in H1 2026 without clear communication to the community.
For Polygon Labs CEO Marc Boiron, the transition into a blockchain payment firm would ensure its profitability in 2027.
As of writing, the project has yet to respond to Hopmans’ call for transparency and accountability to the community. That said, Polygon’s move was not surprising given its resilience in the competitive payments segment.
The Ethereum L2 hit a record $106B in annual stablecoin transfer volume in 2025. So far in 2026, the volume is clocking $70B. This has been a growing trend since 2023, making it a key settlement layer for stablecoins, just like Ethereum, Tron, and Arbitrum.
But in terms of market share, Polygon’s rising stablecoin volumes didn’t translate to increasing dominance.
In fact, since 2023, its market share of the stablecoin settlement market has dropped from 1.54% to 0.72% in 2026. In other words, it has lost about half of its market share in an increasingly competitive segment.
Over the same period, Solana [SOL] and Base have increased their market share from zero to 22% and 16%, respectively.
It remains to be seen how the aggressive shifts to payments will bolster Polygon’s standings in the stablecoin settlement sector.
#PEPEATH
#LISTAAirdrop
#MantaRWA
#BitcoinDunyamiz
#CryptoPatience
Article
OP Enterprise Gains Attention — Here’s What ChangesIn a recent tweet, Optimism emphasized how onchain finance scales through applications that users already trust. According to their post, this model is viable only if the underlying settlement layer remains reliable during high volume periods. This statement was made in response to insights shared by @inkonchain, indicating a focus on OP Enterprise’s capabilities. The broader crypto market is currently experiencing mixed signals, with varied momentum across major assets. Optimism’s tweet, which garnered significant engagement with 165 likes and 22 retweets, reflects growing interest in the potential of OP Enterprise to enhance onchain finance. By highlighting the importance of trusted applications and dependable settlement layers, Optimism positions OP Enterprise as a key player in the evolving landscape of decentralized finance. This focus could attract developers seeking to build robust financial applications, thus fostering a more resilient ecosystem. Currently, OP Enterprise is not registering any trading volume, indicating that this conversation is still in the early stages of development. Despite the lack of price movement, the tweet’s high engagement suggests a growing interest in the underlying technology and its implications for future applications. The current market context, marked by mixed signals, could provide fertile ground for OP Enterprise’s initiatives to gain traction as developers respond to this call for innovation. OP Enterprise operates under the Optimism framework, which aims to enhance the scalability of blockchain applications. Its focus on providing a reliable settlement layer is crucial as the demand for efficient onchain finance grows. The conversation around trusted applications is not new, but Optimism’s recent emphasis could signal a pivotal moment for developers looking to navigate the complexities of decentralized finance. Traders should keep an eye on the developments around OP Enterprise as the conversation continues to unfold. Significant wallet movements and increased engagement could signal a shift in developer interest and user adoption. Moreover, any subsequent announcements or partnerships could further impact the sentiment around OP Enterprise and its role in the broader market landscape. #SanDiskFalls12.63% #MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff #SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice #NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch #HYPEFalls8%

OP Enterprise Gains Attention — Here’s What Changes

In a recent tweet, Optimism emphasized how onchain finance scales through applications that users already trust. According to their post, this model is viable only if the underlying settlement layer remains reliable during high volume periods. This statement was made in response to insights shared by @inkonchain, indicating a focus on OP Enterprise’s capabilities.
The broader crypto market is currently experiencing mixed signals, with varied momentum across major assets. Optimism’s tweet, which garnered significant engagement with 165 likes and 22 retweets, reflects growing interest in the potential of OP Enterprise to enhance onchain finance. By highlighting the importance of trusted applications and dependable settlement layers, Optimism positions OP Enterprise as a key player in the evolving landscape of decentralized finance. This focus could attract developers seeking to build robust financial applications, thus fostering a more resilient ecosystem.
Currently, OP Enterprise is not registering any trading volume, indicating that this conversation is still in the early stages of development. Despite the lack of price movement, the tweet’s high engagement suggests a growing interest in the underlying technology and its implications for future applications. The current market context, marked by mixed signals, could provide fertile ground for OP Enterprise’s initiatives to gain traction as developers respond to this call for innovation.
OP Enterprise operates under the Optimism framework, which aims to enhance the scalability of blockchain applications. Its focus on providing a reliable settlement layer is crucial as the demand for efficient onchain finance grows. The conversation around trusted applications is not new, but Optimism’s recent emphasis could signal a pivotal moment for developers looking to navigate the complexities of decentralized finance.
Traders should keep an eye on the developments around OP Enterprise as the conversation continues to unfold. Significant wallet movements and increased engagement could signal a shift in developer interest and user adoption. Moreover, any subsequent announcements or partnerships could further impact the sentiment around OP Enterprise and its role in the broader market landscape.
#SanDiskFalls12.63%
#MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff
#SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice
#NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch
#HYPEFalls8%
Article
Optimism Highlights $75M Revenue Potential from OP Stack — The Takeaway for CryptoIn a recent tweet, Optimism highlighted a remarkable revenue opportunity for exchanges leveraging its OP Stack. A top-3 US exchange reportedly secured $75 million in sequencer revenue during the second half of 2025 by operating its own chain on this technology. This insight illustrates the advantages of ownership in the blockchain space, as detailed in their tweet. The broader crypto market is currently exhibiting mixed signals, with varying momentum across major assets. In this context, Optimism’s revelation about its OP Stack’s potential stands out. By owning their infrastructure, exchanges can retain 100% of their revenue while having the flexibility to customize fees and block space. This strategic move not only enhances profitability for exchanges but also aligns with ongoing discussions about revenue generation in the crypto sector. The tweet has garnered significant engagement, growing interest in Optimism’s innovative approach. Currently, the price of Optimism remains at $0, with no trading volume reported in the last 24 hours. This lack of price movement indicates a pause in market activity. However, the insights shared by Optimism can influence future trading dynamics as stakeholders evaluate the implications of owning chain operations. The emphasis on revenue retention through the OP Stack could attract more exchanges to consider similar strategies, potentially leading to increased adoption of Optimism’s technology. Optimism is a prominent layer-2 solution that aims to enhance Ethereum’s scalability and efficiency. Its OP Stack technology allows developers to build customizable chains while facilitating lower transaction costs. As the blockchain landscape evolves, Optimism’s focus on empowering exchanges and generating revenue through ownership positions it strategically within the market. The recent discussions around its capabilities reflect a broader trend in the industry towards optimizing financial models on decentralized platforms. Traders are closely watching how the insights from Optimism might influence other exchanges and projects in the blockchain ecosystem. The potential for increased adoption of the OP Stack could lead to more exchanges exploring similar infrastructural ownership, potentially reshaping transaction dynamics. Additionally, market participants may evaluate how this development interacts with macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and regulatory frameworks, which could further impact the broader crypto market. Observing price behavior and trading volume in the coming days will be crucial as these developments unfold. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. #gonnarich #MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff #SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice #NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch #devcripto

Optimism Highlights $75M Revenue Potential from OP Stack — The Takeaway for Crypto

In a recent tweet, Optimism highlighted a remarkable revenue opportunity for exchanges leveraging its OP Stack. A top-3 US exchange reportedly secured $75 million in sequencer revenue during the second half of 2025 by operating its own chain on this technology. This insight illustrates the advantages of ownership in the blockchain space, as detailed in their tweet.
The broader crypto market is currently exhibiting mixed signals, with varying momentum across major assets. In this context, Optimism’s revelation about its OP Stack’s potential stands out. By owning their infrastructure, exchanges can retain 100% of their revenue while having the flexibility to customize fees and block space. This strategic move not only enhances profitability for exchanges but also aligns with ongoing discussions about revenue generation in the crypto sector. The tweet has garnered significant engagement, growing interest in Optimism’s innovative approach.
Currently, the price of Optimism remains at $0, with no trading volume reported in the last 24 hours. This lack of price movement indicates a pause in market activity. However, the insights shared by Optimism can influence future trading dynamics as stakeholders evaluate the implications of owning chain operations. The emphasis on revenue retention through the OP Stack could attract more exchanges to consider similar strategies, potentially leading to increased adoption of Optimism’s technology.
Optimism is a prominent layer-2 solution that aims to enhance Ethereum’s scalability and efficiency. Its OP Stack technology allows developers to build customizable chains while facilitating lower transaction costs. As the blockchain landscape evolves, Optimism’s focus on empowering exchanges and generating revenue through ownership positions it strategically within the market. The recent discussions around its capabilities reflect a broader trend in the industry towards optimizing financial models on decentralized platforms.
Traders are closely watching how the insights from Optimism might influence other exchanges and projects in the blockchain ecosystem. The potential for increased adoption of the OP Stack could lead to more exchanges exploring similar infrastructural ownership, potentially reshaping transaction dynamics. Additionally, market participants may evaluate how this development interacts with macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and regulatory frameworks, which could further impact the broader crypto market. Observing price behavior and trading volume in the coming days will be crucial as these developments unfold.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
#gonnarich
#MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff
#SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice
#NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch #devcripto
Partly True
Article
One of the First Whales in an Altcoin Reached the End of His Patience After a Five-Year Wait and SolAn institution, reportedly among Lido’s early investors, transferred 4.3 million $LDO tokens, which it had held for approximately five and a half years, to the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken. According to on-chain data, the current value of the transfer is approximately $1.61 million. The fact that the tokens were sent to a centralized exchange has led to speculation that the investor may be preparing to sell. However, it is not yet known whether the transferred assets have been sold. The relevant institution reportedly received a total of 5 million $LDO as part of an investment allocation made in December 2020. Based on the tokens’ peak prices in 2021, the value of these assets had risen to approximately $30 million. Currently, however, the total market value of the allocated 5 million $LDO has decreased to approximately $1.88 million. Related News Net Inflows into Cryptocurrency Investment Products Have Begun Again: Is This a Sign of a Bitcoin Rally? However, it is estimated that the investor purchased $LDO tokens at an average cost of $0.0085. Therefore, despite the sharp drop in the $LDO price, the institution is still calculated to be more than 40 times more profitable than its initial investment On the other hand, another address suspected of being linked to a16z reportedly withdrew 471,500 HYPE from Hyperliquid in the last 24 hours. The tokens, worth approximately $30.57 million, were then transferred to centralized exchanges such as OKX, Bybit, and Gate. #MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff #SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice #NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch #BrentRises12%Weekly #BrentRises12%Weekly

One of the First Whales in an Altcoin Reached the End of His Patience After a Five-Year Wait and Sol

An institution, reportedly among Lido’s early investors, transferred 4.3 million $LDO tokens, which it had held for approximately five and a half years, to the cryptocurrency exchange Kraken.
According to on-chain data, the current value of the transfer is approximately $1.61 million. The fact that the tokens were sent to a centralized exchange has led to speculation that the investor may be preparing to sell. However, it is not yet known whether the transferred assets have been sold.
The relevant institution reportedly received a total of 5 million $LDO as part of an investment allocation made in December 2020. Based on the tokens’ peak prices in 2021, the value of these assets had risen to approximately $30 million. Currently, however, the total market value of the allocated 5 million $LDO has decreased to approximately $1.88 million.
Related News Net Inflows into Cryptocurrency Investment Products Have Begun Again: Is This a Sign of a Bitcoin Rally?
However, it is estimated that the investor purchased $LDO tokens at an average cost of $0.0085. Therefore, despite the sharp drop in the $LDO price, the institution is still calculated to be more than 40 times more profitable than its initial investment
On the other hand, another address suspected of being linked to a16z reportedly withdrew 471,500 HYPE from Hyperliquid in the last 24 hours. The tokens, worth approximately $30.57 million, were then transferred to centralized exchanges such as OKX, Bybit, and Gate.
#MoonshotKimiK3SparksChipSelloff
#SpaceXClosesBelowIPOPrice
#NikkeiFalls5%WorstSinceMarch
#BrentRises12%Weekly
#BrentRises12%Weekly
Article
Augur returns with decentralized layer for disputed prediction marketsAugur has returned with a proposed resolution system and a two-month token migration test as prediction markets draw increased institutional scrutiny. According to a press release shared with crypto.news, the Lituus Foundation announced the relaunch alongside the Augur Lituus whitepaper, which outlines a settlement layer for prediction markets facing disputed outcomes. Under the proposed system, markets could resolve contested events without depending on a company, committee, multisignature wallet, or governance council. Rather than opening another trading platform, the foundation plans to offer the resolution layer as infrastructure that other prediction markets and protocols could use. Its design separates the process of determining an outcome from services such as trading, liquidity management, user interfaces, and customer distribution. The whitepaper also compares several decentralized oracle systems, focusing on how each one may perform when participants have a financial reason to influence a result. According to the foundation, Augur Lituus uses economic incentives intended to make support for an accurate outcome more rational than backing a false one. Prediction markets are also facing closer examination over how traders may use confidential information. As previously reported by crypto.news, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America have introduced or revised employee policies covering event contracts. Those restrictions are intended to limit insider-trading and conflict-of-interest risks on platforms including Polymarket and Kalshi, crypto.news reported. Employees may hold information about elections, economic releases, corporate decisions or geopolitical developments before it becomes public. Goldman Sachs has prohibited staff from trading contracts connected to the bank, elections, financial markets, macroeconomic data and geopolitics. The bank adopted the rules as regulators and companies began paying closer attention to employee activity on prediction platforms. While those controls concern who may trade and what information they possess, Augur’s proposed system addresses a separate part of the market: how a disputed contract is settled after the underlying event has occurred. The foundation has not provided a launch date for general use of the Lituus resolution layer. #SanDiskFalls12.63% #Kriptocutrader #ZAIBOTIO #satoshiNakamato #LUNCDream

Augur returns with decentralized layer for disputed prediction markets

Augur has returned with a proposed resolution system and a two-month token migration test as prediction markets draw increased institutional scrutiny.
According to a press release shared with crypto.news, the Lituus Foundation announced the relaunch alongside the Augur Lituus whitepaper, which outlines a settlement layer for prediction markets facing disputed outcomes. Under the proposed system, markets could resolve contested events without depending on a company, committee, multisignature wallet, or governance council.
Rather than opening another trading platform, the foundation plans to offer the resolution layer as infrastructure that other prediction markets and protocols could use. Its design separates the process of determining an outcome from services such as trading, liquidity management, user interfaces, and customer distribution.
The whitepaper also compares several decentralized oracle systems, focusing on how each one may perform when participants have a financial reason to influence a result. According to the foundation, Augur Lituus uses economic incentives intended to make support for an accurate outcome more rational than backing a false one.
Prediction markets are also facing closer examination over how traders may use confidential information. As previously reported by crypto.news, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America have introduced or revised employee policies covering event contracts.
Those restrictions are intended to limit insider-trading and conflict-of-interest risks on platforms including Polymarket and Kalshi, crypto.news reported. Employees may hold information about elections, economic releases, corporate decisions or geopolitical developments before it becomes public.
Goldman Sachs has prohibited staff from trading contracts connected to the bank, elections, financial markets, macroeconomic data and geopolitics. The bank adopted the rules as regulators and companies began paying closer attention to employee activity on prediction platforms.
While those controls concern who may trade and what information they possess, Augur’s proposed system addresses a separate part of the market: how a disputed contract is settled after the underlying event has occurred. The foundation has not provided a launch date for general use of the Lituus resolution layer.
#SanDiskFalls12.63%
#Kriptocutrader
#ZAIBOTIO
#satoshiNakamato
#LUNCDream
Verified
Article
Cardano Advances Decentralization With New Infrastructure Governance ModelInput Output has announced an infrastructure governance model for Cardano, shifting responsibility for core development away from a single founding company and toward specialist ecosystem teams. The transition covers the Cardano Haskell node, Plutus, Daedalus, Hydra and developer relations, placing some of the network’s most important engineering surfaces into a more distributed operating structure. The change is not just about governance votes. Cardano is decentralizing how the network is built, extending the Voltaire-era logic from decision-making into day-to-day infrastructure maintenance. Specialist partners including Se7en Labs and Teragone will assume responsibility for specific components, with named partners, public repositories and Intersect oversight intended to make the process auditable. That structure matters because decentralized governance can still depend on centralized engineering if one organization controls the reference software, delivery cadence and developer coordination. The new model targets that remaining dependency, asking the ecosystem to prove it can maintain critical infrastructure through transparent teams rather than implicit reliance on Input Output. Charles Hoskinson said the process is expected to conclude in 2027, with independent firms maintaining at least three Cardano implementations written in Haskell, Rust and Go. Those implementations are expected to be supported by formal specifications overseen by organizations including Intersect and Pragma, while development remains subject to community review and voting. The multi-implementation goal raises the stakes, because software diversity can improve resilience, but only if specifications, testing and governance coordination stay disciplined across teams and languages. Input Output is also reshaping its role. IO Labs is spinning out development of the Haskell node to community control, while Input Output plans to focus more heavily on research and venture creation through IO Labs and IO Ventures. The broader structure is designed to reduce Cardano’s dependence on one organization and strengthen the case for community-funded infrastructure through the Cardano treasury. The transition turns decentralization into an operational budget question, because independent teams must be funded, measured and held accountable. The decentralization campaign launched July 17 with a dedicated website and short film. Additional milestones for the Haskell node, Plutus, Hydra and developer relations are expected from August through December 2026, with IO Labs and IO Ventures operating under the new structure from January 2027. The real test is execution, not rhetoric, as Cardano moves from shared governance ideals toward shared engineering responsibility. #quickfarm #yescoin #ZAIBOTIO #Altcoins!

Cardano Advances Decentralization With New Infrastructure Governance Model

Input Output has announced an infrastructure governance model for Cardano, shifting responsibility for core development away from a single founding company and toward specialist ecosystem teams. The transition covers the Cardano Haskell node, Plutus, Daedalus, Hydra and developer relations, placing some of the network’s most important engineering surfaces into a more distributed operating structure. The change is not just about governance votes. Cardano is decentralizing how the network is built, extending the Voltaire-era logic from decision-making into day-to-day infrastructure maintenance.
Specialist partners including Se7en Labs and Teragone will assume responsibility for specific components, with named partners, public repositories and Intersect oversight intended to make the process auditable. That structure matters because decentralized governance can still depend on centralized engineering if one organization controls the reference software, delivery cadence and developer coordination. The new model targets that remaining dependency, asking the ecosystem to prove it can maintain critical infrastructure through transparent teams rather than implicit reliance on Input Output.
Charles Hoskinson said the process is expected to conclude in 2027, with independent firms maintaining at least three Cardano implementations written in Haskell, Rust and Go. Those implementations are expected to be supported by formal specifications overseen by organizations including Intersect and Pragma, while development remains subject to community review and voting. The multi-implementation goal raises the stakes, because software diversity can improve resilience, but only if specifications, testing and governance coordination stay disciplined across teams and languages.
Input Output is also reshaping its role. IO Labs is spinning out development of the Haskell node to community control, while Input Output plans to focus more heavily on research and venture creation through IO Labs and IO Ventures. The broader structure is designed to reduce Cardano’s dependence on one organization and strengthen the case for community-funded infrastructure through the Cardano treasury. The transition turns decentralization into an operational budget question, because independent teams must be funded, measured and held accountable.
The decentralization campaign launched July 17 with a dedicated website and short film. Additional milestones for the Haskell node, Plutus, Hydra and developer relations are expected from August through December 2026, with IO Labs and IO Ventures operating under the new structure from January 2027. The real test is execution, not rhetoric, as Cardano moves from shared governance ideals toward shared engineering responsibility.
#quickfarm
#yescoin
#ZAIBOTIO
#Altcoins!
Article
Why is Ethereum falling after briefly breaking above the $1,930 levelEthereum has climbed above $1,930 before retreating toward $1,850, as an early-week rally driven by ETF inflows and easing macro expectations has given way to renewed geopolitical and macroeconomic pressure. CoinGecko data showed Ethereum ($ETH) touched an intraday high of about $1,931 on July 15, its strongest level in weeks, before slipping to around $1,850 over the past 24 hours. Softer-than-expected US economic data, including weaker labor market readings, strengthened expectations that the Federal Reserve could ease monetary policy sooner than previously expected. Renewed tensions between the United States and Iran triggered a broader risk-off move across financial markets, weighing on both technology stocks and cryptocurrencies. The major Glamsterdam upgrade, which developers expect to improve scalability and reduce gas costs, has also been delayed until the latter half of the third quarter, leaving investors without a major near-term network catalyst. Market analysts remain divided on whether Ethereum has started building a lasting recovery or is still trading within a broader downtrend. Crypto analyst Daan Crypto Trades said $ETH has successfully turned the $1,750 horizontal level into support, describing it as the first meaningful reclaim of a previous resistance area during the current downtrend. According to Daan, a successful hold above that level could support a move toward the long-standing $2,100 resistance zone, while a drop below $1,750 would invalidate the bullish setup. A more cautious view came from Mister Crypto, who argued that Ethereum continues to respect a long-term descending trendline that has rejected the price four times since its 2025 peak. According to the analyst, $ETH has yet to break that resistance decisively, meaning recent rallies still qualify as lower highs within the broader bearish structure. A sustained break above the trendline is needed before the longer-term outlook improves, the analyst said, adding that continued rejection could leave the token vulnerable to a deeper decline toward $1,200. #HormuzTransitsDropToThreeWeekLow #CardanoHardForkUpgradeSetForJuly18 #EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin #USInsiderSellingNearsRecordPace #MSCIEMIndexNearsCorrection

Why is Ethereum falling after briefly breaking above the $1,930 level

Ethereum has climbed above $1,930 before retreating toward $1,850, as an early-week rally driven by ETF inflows and easing macro expectations has given way to renewed geopolitical and macroeconomic pressure.
CoinGecko data showed Ethereum ($ETH) touched an intraday high of about $1,931 on July 15, its strongest level in weeks, before slipping to around $1,850 over the past 24 hours.
Softer-than-expected US economic data, including weaker labor market readings, strengthened expectations that the Federal Reserve could ease monetary policy sooner than previously expected.
Renewed tensions between the United States and Iran triggered a broader risk-off move across financial markets, weighing on both technology stocks and cryptocurrencies.
The major Glamsterdam upgrade, which developers expect to improve scalability and reduce gas costs, has also been delayed until the latter half of the third quarter, leaving investors without a major near-term network catalyst.
Market analysts remain divided on whether Ethereum has started building a lasting recovery or is still trading within a broader downtrend.
Crypto analyst Daan Crypto Trades said $ETH has successfully turned the $1,750 horizontal level into support, describing it as the first meaningful reclaim of a previous resistance area during the current downtrend.
According to Daan, a successful hold above that level could support a move toward the long-standing $2,100 resistance zone, while a drop below $1,750 would invalidate the bullish setup.
A more cautious view came from Mister Crypto, who argued that Ethereum continues to respect a long-term descending trendline that has rejected the price four times since its 2025 peak.
According to the analyst, $ETH has yet to break that resistance decisively, meaning recent rallies still qualify as lower highs within the broader bearish structure.
A sustained break above the trendline is needed before the longer-term outlook improves, the analyst said, adding that continued rejection could leave the token vulnerable to a deeper decline toward $1,200.
#HormuzTransitsDropToThreeWeekLow
#CardanoHardForkUpgradeSetForJuly18
#EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin
#USInsiderSellingNearsRecordPace
#MSCIEMIndexNearsCorrection
Article
Former Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato joins EthlabsFormer Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato has joined independent protocol research group Ethlabs, extending the movement of core Ethereum developers into organizations operating outside the Foundation. According to a statement shared by Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato on X, he has left the Ethereum Foundation after five years to join Ethlabs, a nonprofit protocol research organization established by former Foundation researchers to continue Ethereum core development. During his time at EF Research, D’Amato said he worked across several protocol research areas, including maximal extractable value (MEV), consensus mechanisms, data availability sampling, and execution layer pricing. He described the decision to leave as difficult but said the current period of change made it the right moment for “a new beginning.” Leaving that behind is hard, but after 5 years this time of great change seems right for a new beginning,” D’Amato wrote. He added that, for the first time since beginning Ethereum protocol research, he believes there is “a credible shot” for core research to advance outside the Ethereum Foundation. At Ethlabs, he said he will work alongside former EF colleagues to expand the organization’s protocol research efforts, bring new researchers into the ecosystem, and continue contributing to Ethereum’s long-term technical roadmap. Among his priorities, D’Amato said he intends to keep working on reducing Ethereum’s transaction finality time, stating that he plans to focus much of his effort on helping Ethereum “finalize much faster, as soon as possible.” Ethlabs launched in June as an independent nonprofit research organization founded by former Ethereum Foundation researchers Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma. The organization said its research spans settlement speed, network capacity, native asset issuance, cross-chain interoperability, and Ethereum’s monetary design. Backed by Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin, Bitmine, SharpLink, Anchorage, Octant, SNZ, and other Ethereum ecosystem participants, Ethlabs has said its research priorities are tied to growing institutional use of Ethereum for stablecoins, tokenized assets, investment products, and AI-driven commerce. The group has also stated that research decisions remain independent despite corporate funding, with contributions managed through an external grants administrator. When the organization launched, executive director Ansgar Dietrichs said Ethlabs was created to advance Ethereum’s core technology while providing a long-term home for protocol researchers outside the Ethereum Foundation. Lubin described the organization as another stewardship body working alongside the Foundation and other independent contributors to Ethereum’s development. D’Amato’s move comes as the Ethereum Foundation continues reshaping its internal structure and as more protocol work shifts to independent organizations. Last month, the Foundation reduced its workforce by 54 positions, or about 20%, following a review of its staffing and long-term responsibilities. It later dissolved its Protocol Support team while reorganizing its remaining work into dedicated divisions covering protocol development, users, community, access, and institutional activity. The restructuring has also led to the creation of new Ethereum-focused organizations. Earlier this month, former Foundation employees Mo Jalil, Oskar Thorén, and Aaryamann Challani launched EthSystems, a for-profit company building confidential infrastructure for regulated financial institutions on Ethereum with backing from Bitmine, SharpLink, and Lubin. #quesquestion #DelistingAlert #cryptouniverseofficial #MbeyaconsciousComunity #ZeroFeeTrading

Former Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato joins Ethlabs

Former Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato has joined independent protocol research group Ethlabs, extending the movement of core Ethereum developers into organizations operating outside the Foundation.
According to a statement shared by Ethereum Foundation researcher Francesco D’Amato on X, he has left the Ethereum Foundation after five years to join Ethlabs, a nonprofit protocol research organization established by former Foundation researchers to continue Ethereum core development.
During his time at EF Research, D’Amato said he worked across several protocol research areas, including maximal extractable value (MEV), consensus mechanisms, data availability sampling, and execution layer pricing. He described the decision to leave as difficult but said the current period of change made it the right moment for “a new beginning.”
Leaving that behind is hard, but after 5 years this time of great change seems right for a new beginning,” D’Amato wrote.
He added that, for the first time since beginning Ethereum protocol research, he believes there is “a credible shot” for core research to advance outside the Ethereum Foundation.
At Ethlabs, he said he will work alongside former EF colleagues to expand the organization’s protocol research efforts, bring new researchers into the ecosystem, and continue contributing to Ethereum’s long-term technical roadmap.
Among his priorities, D’Amato said he intends to keep working on reducing Ethereum’s transaction finality time, stating that he plans to focus much of his effort on helping Ethereum “finalize much faster, as soon as possible.”
Ethlabs launched in June as an independent nonprofit research organization founded by former Ethereum Foundation researchers Ansgar Dietrichs, Barnabé Monnot, Caspar Schwarz Schilling, Josh Rudolf, and Julian Ma. The organization said its research spans settlement speed, network capacity, native asset issuance, cross-chain interoperability, and Ethereum’s monetary design.
Backed by Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin, Bitmine, SharpLink, Anchorage, Octant, SNZ, and other Ethereum ecosystem participants, Ethlabs has said its research priorities are tied to growing institutional use of Ethereum for stablecoins, tokenized assets, investment products, and AI-driven commerce.
The group has also stated that research decisions remain independent despite corporate funding, with contributions managed through an external grants administrator.
When the organization launched, executive director Ansgar Dietrichs said Ethlabs was created to advance Ethereum’s core technology while providing a long-term home for protocol researchers outside the Ethereum Foundation. Lubin described the organization as another stewardship body working alongside the Foundation and other independent contributors to Ethereum’s development.
D’Amato’s move comes as the Ethereum Foundation continues reshaping its internal structure and as more protocol work shifts to independent organizations.
Last month, the Foundation reduced its workforce by 54 positions, or about 20%, following a review of its staffing and long-term responsibilities. It later dissolved its Protocol Support team while reorganizing its remaining work into dedicated divisions covering protocol development, users, community, access, and institutional activity.
The restructuring has also led to the creation of new Ethereum-focused organizations. Earlier this month, former Foundation employees Mo Jalil, Oskar Thorén, and Aaryamann Challani launched EthSystems, a for-profit company building confidential infrastructure for regulated financial institutions on Ethereum with backing from Bitmine, SharpLink, and Lubin.
#quesquestion
#DelistingAlert
#cryptouniverseofficial
#MbeyaconsciousComunity
#ZeroFeeTrading
Article
HBAR News Today: Hedera’s TVL Falls 40% After $9.05M Bonzo Lend Exploit, Even as Lloyds Banking GrouHedera has had a genuinely split week. On one side, an oracle exploit drained $9.05 million from the network’s largest DeFi lending protocol and wiped out nearly 40% of Hedera’s total value locked in a single day. On the other, Lloyds Banking Group, Aberdeen Investments, and Archax completed the UK’s first foreign exchange transaction using tokenized real-world assets as collateral on Hedera — a genuine institutional milestone that landed in an HM Treasury-backed report the same week. Here’s what’s actually happening with $HBAR right now, and why the network’s enterprise-heavy governance model makes this kind of split story more common than it is for most Layer 1 networks. According to Bonzo’s official incident report, the exploit began around 00:51 UTC on July 11, 2026, when an attacker deposited just 250 SAUCE tokens — worth only a few dollars — and submitted a manipulated price update to an on-demand oracle contract. The false update inflated SAUCE’s value by roughly 12 orders of magnitude, and critically, the oracle verifier accepted the update even though it carried a zeroed signature rather than a valid signature from the authorized oracle committee. Eight seconds later, the attacker used that inflated collateral to borrow approximately 6.6 million USDC and 34.5 million Wrapped $HBAR (WHBAR), together worth about $9.05 million. A second wallet borrowed roughly $1 million during the same window before identifying itself to the Bonzo team as a white-hat responder and pledging to return the funds — bringing total abnormal borrowing during the incident to about $10.06 million, though Bonzo’s headline loss figure of $9.05 million excludes the funds the white-hat wallet said it would return. Blockchain security researchers Specter and PeckShield tracked over $5.25 million of the stolen funds being bridged from Hedera to Ethereum via LayerZero and swapped from Wrapped Bitcoin into ETH. Bonzo Lend and Bonzo Points remain paused while the team evaluates recovery options; Bonzo Vaults, Bonzo Bridge, and single-sided staking were unaffected and continue operating normally. Bonzo attributed the failure specifically to a flaw in Supra’s third-party oracle verification infrastructure, stating the incident was not caused by vulnerabilities in Bonzo’s own smart contracts or in Hedera’s underlying network — a distinction that matters, since it means the exploit reflects a weakness in one DeFi protocol’s chosen oracle provider rather than a flaw in Hedera’s core consensus mechanism. Supra has since acknowledged the issue and deployed a fix to the affected verifier contract. Council members span technology, finance, telecommunications, energy, and academia, and include Google, IBM, Boeing, FedEx, Dell, Deutsche Telekom, LG Electronics, Standard Bank, Chainlink Labs, Nomura Holdings, Ubisoft, McLaren Racing, and Accenture (which joined in April 2026 to build enterprise AI governance infrastructure on the network), alongside academic institutions including the London School of Economics and University College London. Modifications to Hedera’s total $HBAR supply — capped at 50 billion tokens — require unanimous agreement from every council member, the highest governance threshold in the network’s structure. $HBAR was one of 16 tokens the SEC and CFTC included on a formal digital commodity classification list published March 17, 2026, alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP — a notable inclusion that expanded regulated institutional access to the token. That classification helped pave the way for products like the Canary Capital $HBAR spot ETF (ticker: HBR), which has drawn cumulative inflows of roughly $93 million since launch, with net assets around $49 million, alongside a Hashdex index product that also includes $HBAR exposure. For more on the platforms tracking crypto market data, see our explainers on what Coinglass tracks in derivatives markets and what RWA.xyz measures in tokenized assets. For the broader crypto market picture, see today’s Crypto Market Today and Crypto News Today roundup. #jasmyustd #kdmrcrypto #hottrendingtopics #Fatihcoşar #GoogleDocsMagic

HBAR News Today: Hedera’s TVL Falls 40% After $9.05M Bonzo Lend Exploit, Even as Lloyds Banking Grou

Hedera has had a genuinely split week. On one side, an oracle exploit drained $9.05 million from the network’s largest DeFi lending protocol and wiped out nearly 40% of Hedera’s total value locked in a single day. On the other, Lloyds Banking Group, Aberdeen Investments, and Archax completed the UK’s first foreign exchange transaction using tokenized real-world assets as collateral on Hedera — a genuine institutional milestone that landed in an HM Treasury-backed report the same week. Here’s what’s actually happening with $HBAR right now, and why the network’s enterprise-heavy governance model makes this kind of split story more common than it is for most Layer 1 networks.
According to Bonzo’s official incident report, the exploit began around 00:51 UTC on July 11, 2026, when an attacker deposited just 250 SAUCE tokens — worth only a few dollars — and submitted a manipulated price update to an on-demand oracle contract. The false update inflated SAUCE’s value by roughly 12 orders of magnitude, and critically, the oracle verifier accepted the update even though it carried a zeroed signature rather than a valid signature from the authorized oracle committee. Eight seconds later, the attacker used that inflated collateral to borrow approximately 6.6 million USDC and 34.5 million Wrapped $HBAR (WHBAR), together worth about $9.05 million. A second wallet borrowed roughly $1 million during the same window before identifying itself to the Bonzo team as a white-hat responder and pledging to return the funds — bringing total abnormal borrowing during the incident to about $10.06 million, though Bonzo’s headline loss figure of $9.05 million excludes the funds the white-hat wallet said it would return.
Blockchain security researchers Specter and PeckShield tracked over $5.25 million of the stolen funds being bridged from Hedera to Ethereum via LayerZero and swapped from Wrapped Bitcoin into ETH. Bonzo Lend and Bonzo Points remain paused while the team evaluates recovery options; Bonzo Vaults, Bonzo Bridge, and single-sided staking were unaffected and continue operating normally. Bonzo attributed the failure specifically to a flaw in Supra’s third-party oracle verification infrastructure, stating the incident was not caused by vulnerabilities in Bonzo’s own smart contracts or in Hedera’s underlying network — a distinction that matters, since it means the exploit reflects a weakness in one DeFi protocol’s chosen oracle provider rather than a flaw in Hedera’s core consensus mechanism. Supra has since acknowledged the issue and deployed a fix to the affected verifier contract.
Council members span technology, finance, telecommunications, energy, and academia, and include Google, IBM, Boeing, FedEx, Dell, Deutsche Telekom, LG Electronics, Standard Bank, Chainlink Labs, Nomura Holdings, Ubisoft, McLaren Racing, and Accenture (which joined in April 2026 to build enterprise AI governance infrastructure on the network), alongside academic institutions including the London School of Economics and University College London. Modifications to Hedera’s total $HBAR supply — capped at 50 billion tokens — require unanimous agreement from every council member, the highest governance threshold in the network’s structure.
$HBAR was one of 16 tokens the SEC and CFTC included on a formal digital commodity classification list published March 17, 2026, alongside Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and XRP — a notable inclusion that expanded regulated institutional access to the token. That classification helped pave the way for products like the Canary Capital $HBAR spot ETF (ticker: HBR), which has drawn cumulative inflows of roughly $93 million since launch, with net assets around $49 million, alongside a Hashdex index product that also includes $HBAR exposure.
For more on the platforms tracking crypto market data, see our explainers on what Coinglass tracks in derivatives markets and what RWA.xyz measures in tokenized assets. For the broader crypto market picture, see today’s Crypto Market Today and Crypto News Today roundup.
#jasmyustd
#kdmrcrypto
#hottrendingtopics
#Fatihcoşar
#GoogleDocsMagic
Article
ORO Puts Avalanche in the Spotlight as Its Fluency Campaign Enters the Final DaysThe clock is now officially ticking on ORO’s “Clarity for Avalanche” campaign, with the team confirming that only a few days remain for users to finish the program and claim a share of its 500,000 ORE Points pool before the July 22 cutoff. For those who haven’t been following, ORO is an AI-powered execution layer that has spent the past few months trying to make DeFi feel less like a technical obstacle course and more like a day to day app, allowing users to simply type what they want in plain language with the platform handling the rest (be it routing, doing the gas math or performing txn execution behind the scenes). The Avalanche campaign, which went live earlier this month on the 8th, applies that same philosophy to learning, i.e. instead of wading through troves and troves of documentation, participants work through interactive lessons on the Avalanche (AVAX) ecosystem directly inside the ORO app. Subsequently, they can then put that knowledge into practice with the AI guiding each step. The rewards structure is refreshingly simple as well such that completing the campaign drops 5,000 ORE Points into a user’s account instantly, along with a badge. Sharing that badge on X earns another 1,000 while everyone who finishes before the July 22 deadline splits the wider 500,000-point pool. There is, however, a bigger reason the deadline matters because as per team, this may be one of the last opportunities to accumulate ORE Points before the ORO token generation event (TGE), which puts a fairly hard expiry date on what has so far been an open window. The aforementioned campaign seems to have come at a time when ORO has been on a partnership tear. Firstly, the company teamed up with Spectre AI in an effort to bring market intelligence and trade execution into a single experience. Circle’s CCTP and Wormhole were also integrated subsequently, meaning USDC can now move across chains natively, with no wrapped tokens or synthetic assets involved. The ORO Widget also went live inside Nawa Finance and Oroswap, letting users ask questions and execute actions without ever leaving those apps. On the education front, a partnership with Edu3Labs extended ORO’s reach to a community of more than 5 million users (all while co-founder Katerina represented the project at Raise Summit in Paris). From the outside looking in, community observers commented that the recent slew of alliances (all of whom occurred within a span of ten days) bore the hallmark of a project building with unusual consistency. What makes the Avalanche campaign notable is how neatly it has captured ORO’s broader pitch, i.e. the barrier to DeFi has never really been access but knowing where to start. A guided, conversational introduction to one of the industry’s most active ecosystems, paid for in points that convert into rewards at token launch, is a fairly compelling answer to that problem. #PEPEATH #Dubai_Crypto_Group #ZeroFeeTrading #AmanSaiCommUNITY #Write2Earn‬

ORO Puts Avalanche in the Spotlight as Its Fluency Campaign Enters the Final Days

The clock is now officially ticking on ORO’s “Clarity for Avalanche” campaign, with the team confirming that only a few days remain for users to finish the program and claim a share of its 500,000 ORE Points pool before the July 22 cutoff.
For those who haven’t been following, ORO is an AI-powered execution layer that has spent the past few months trying to make DeFi feel less like a technical obstacle course and more like a day to day app, allowing users to simply type what they want in plain language with the platform handling the rest (be it routing, doing the gas math or performing txn execution behind the scenes).
The Avalanche campaign, which went live earlier this month on the 8th, applies that same philosophy to learning, i.e. instead of wading through troves and troves of documentation, participants work through interactive lessons on the Avalanche (AVAX) ecosystem directly inside the ORO app. Subsequently, they can then put that knowledge into practice with the AI guiding each step.
The rewards structure is refreshingly simple as well such that completing the campaign drops 5,000 ORE Points into a user’s account instantly, along with a badge. Sharing that badge on X earns another 1,000 while everyone who finishes before the July 22 deadline splits the wider 500,000-point pool.
There is, however, a bigger reason the deadline matters because as per team, this may be one of the last opportunities to accumulate ORE Points before the ORO token generation event (TGE), which puts a fairly hard expiry date on what has so far been an open window.
The aforementioned campaign seems to have come at a time when ORO has been on a partnership tear. Firstly, the company teamed up with Spectre AI in an effort to bring market intelligence and trade execution into a single experience. Circle’s CCTP and Wormhole were also integrated subsequently, meaning USDC can now move across chains natively, with no wrapped tokens or synthetic assets involved.
The ORO Widget also went live inside Nawa Finance and Oroswap, letting users ask questions and execute actions without ever leaving those apps. On the education front, a partnership with Edu3Labs extended ORO’s reach to a community of more than 5 million users (all while co-founder Katerina represented the project at Raise Summit in Paris).
From the outside looking in, community observers commented that the recent slew of alliances (all of whom occurred within a span of ten days) bore the hallmark of a project building with unusual consistency.
What makes the Avalanche campaign notable is how neatly it has captured ORO’s broader pitch, i.e. the barrier to DeFi has never really been access but knowing where to start. A guided, conversational introduction to one of the industry’s most active ecosystems, paid for in points that convert into rewards at token launch, is a fairly compelling answer to that problem.
#PEPEATH
#Dubai_Crypto_Group
#ZeroFeeTrading
#AmanSaiCommUNITY
#Write2Earn‬
Article
Ripple Engineering Head Reveals What’s Coming Next for XRP LedgerHe shared this during the latest episode of RippleX’s Onchain Economy, where he discussed how blockchain is changing financial infrastructure and what comes next for the XRPL ecosystem. Akinyele said traditional finance is gradually being rebuilt with blockchain technology. He believes the on-chain economy creates new opportunities by changing how value is defined and transferred. Notably, he confirmed that, as Head of Engineering at RippleX, his team focuses on building the features that allow financial institutions to develop their solutions directly on-chain. Akinyele said RippleX is currently focused on developing features that support several important financial services on the $XRP Ledger. These include tokenization, stablecoin payments, token trading on the ledger, and the creation of on-chain financial markets. He said these capabilities help build the internet of value by giving different types of assets more practical use. He also noted that RippleX has learned from working with financial institutions that many of them prefer infrastructure that closely reflects how they already operate. Essentially, RippleX aims to rebuild processes on blockchain rails instead of replacing their existing systems. He added that the decentralized design of the $XRP Ledger provides the shared infrastructure that traditional finance has been missing and also improves reliability, security, accuracy, and operational efficiency. Looking back at developments earlier this year, Akinyele said RippleX introduced features that made permissioned trading possible on the $XRP Ledger. He called attention to additions such as permissioned domains and permissioned decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and explained that they allow financial institutions to verify the participants involved in their trading activities. Akinyele also mentioned how $XRP fits into these plans. He said $XRP’s utility comes from Ripple’s effort to build a trusted financial operating system that supports use cases for financial institutions in their day-to-day operations. He called attention to comments Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has repeatedly made about $XRP being the company’s north star. According to Akinyele, Ripple continues to build around trust, $XRP’s utility, and $XRP’s role in providing liquidity. He said these features will help financial institutions build real financial markets on-chain and operate at a speed that has not been possible before. #EconomicAlert #jasmyustd #GamingCoins #FlokiCoin #ZeroFeeTrading

Ripple Engineering Head Reveals What’s Coming Next for XRP Ledger

He shared this during the latest episode of RippleX’s Onchain Economy, where he discussed how blockchain is changing financial infrastructure and what comes next for the XRPL ecosystem.
Akinyele said traditional finance is gradually being rebuilt with blockchain technology. He believes the on-chain economy creates new opportunities by changing how value is defined and transferred.
Notably, he confirmed that, as Head of Engineering at RippleX, his team focuses on building the features that allow financial institutions to develop their solutions directly on-chain.
Akinyele said RippleX is currently focused on developing features that support several important financial services on the $XRP Ledger.
These include tokenization, stablecoin payments, token trading on the ledger, and the creation of on-chain financial markets. He said these capabilities help build the internet of value by giving different types of assets more practical use.
He also noted that RippleX has learned from working with financial institutions that many of them prefer infrastructure that closely reflects how they already operate.
Essentially, RippleX aims to rebuild processes on blockchain rails instead of replacing their existing systems.
He added that the decentralized design of the $XRP Ledger provides the shared infrastructure that traditional finance has been missing and also improves reliability, security, accuracy, and operational efficiency.
Looking back at developments earlier this year, Akinyele said RippleX introduced features that made permissioned trading possible on the $XRP Ledger.
He called attention to additions such as permissioned domains and permissioned decentralized exchanges (DEXs), and explained that they allow financial institutions to verify the participants involved in their trading activities.
Akinyele also mentioned how $XRP fits into these plans. He said $XRP’s utility comes from Ripple’s effort to build a trusted financial operating system that supports use cases for financial institutions in their day-to-day operations.
He called attention to comments Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has repeatedly made about $XRP being the company’s north star. According to Akinyele, Ripple continues to build around trust, $XRP’s utility, and $XRP’s role in providing liquidity.
He said these features will help financial institutions build real financial markets on-chain and operate at a speed that has not been possible before.
#EconomicAlert
#jasmyustd
#GamingCoins
#FlokiCoin
#ZeroFeeTrading
Article
XRP Finally Crosses the 8M Activated Accounts Milestone After 13 YearsThe latest milestone confirms that the $XRP ecosystem’s user base continues to grow despite the difficult market conditions that have dampened investor sentiment since Q4 2025. At the time of writing, the number of activated wallets had reached 8,000,688, with 688 new accounts added after the network crossed the 8 million mark earlier in the day. Total Activated $XRP Wallets | XRPScan Data from XRPScan also shows that these 8,000,688 activated wallets currently hold 67.526 billion $XRP, which represents the circulating supply of the token The milestone comes even though the pace of new wallet creation on the $XRP Ledger has slowed in recent months. Since March 2026, the network has averaged about 2,300 new accounts each day. However, it is important to note that there were a few stronger days, including 8,817 new wallets on March 19, 4,131 on May 29, and 6,221 on June 30. The difference is largely due to changing market conditions. At this point last year, $XRP was climbing toward a new all-time high. This year, however, the asset has dropped 70% below its $3.60 peak, and this has impacted the pace of new wallet creation. So far in July, the $XRP Ledger has added only 29,000 new wallets. At the same point in June, it had added 32,000 wallets, while the comparable period in May recorded 34,000. This shows that wallet creation has slowed not only compared with last year but also from one month to the next throughout this year. However, participation across the $XRP Ledger remains consistent. While the community celebrates the network’s first 8 million activated accounts, most continue to watch for a recovery in wallet creation. A stronger $XRP price could encourage more users to join the network and help restore the faster growth seen during previous market rallies. #PEPEATH #Kriptocutrader #NOTCOİN #CryptoTrends2024 #satoshiNakamato

XRP Finally Crosses the 8M Activated Accounts Milestone After 13 Years

The latest milestone confirms that the $XRP ecosystem’s user base continues to grow despite the difficult market conditions that have dampened investor sentiment since Q4 2025.
At the time of writing, the number of activated wallets had reached 8,000,688, with 688 new accounts added after the network crossed the 8 million mark earlier in the day.
Total Activated $XRP Wallets | XRPScan
Data from XRPScan also shows that these 8,000,688 activated wallets currently hold 67.526 billion $XRP, which represents the circulating supply of the token
The milestone comes even though the pace of new wallet creation on the $XRP Ledger has slowed in recent months.
Since March 2026, the network has averaged about 2,300 new accounts each day. However, it is important to note that there were a few stronger days, including 8,817 new wallets on March 19, 4,131 on May 29, and 6,221 on June 30.
The difference is largely due to changing market conditions. At this point last year, $XRP was climbing toward a new all-time high. This year, however, the asset has dropped 70% below its $3.60 peak, and this has impacted the pace of new wallet creation.
So far in July, the $XRP Ledger has added only 29,000 new wallets. At the same point in June, it had added 32,000 wallets, while the comparable period in May recorded 34,000. This shows that wallet creation has slowed not only compared with last year but also from one month to the next throughout this year.
However, participation across the $XRP Ledger remains consistent. While the community celebrates the network’s first 8 million activated accounts, most continue to watch for a recovery in wallet creation. A stronger $XRP price could encourage more users to join the network and help restore the faster growth seen during previous market rallies.
#PEPEATH
#Kriptocutrader
#NOTCOİN
#CryptoTrends2024
#satoshiNakamato
Partly True
Article
For fifteen years the loudest promise in crypto was that $XRP would replace Swift. Not complement itIt was the thesis that sold the token, filled the conference halls, and outlasted a five-year lawsuit.On July 9, 2026, Swift answered. The network moved its own blockchain ledger into live operation with seventeen pioneer banks, among them Citi, HSBC, Wells Fargo, UBS, Standard Chartered, and MUFG. The build took nine months. The system runs 24 hours a day across six continents, coordinating cross-border payments on a shared ledger that eliminates the batch windows and cut-off times that made correspondent banking feel like a fax machine. It is, by any fair reading, Swift doing the thing everyone said Swift would never do: shipping blockchain settlement, at scale, with the incumbents, before the disruptor could take the market. And the asset moving across it is tokenized bank deposits. Not $XRP. Not any public token. Banks convert dollars and euros they already hold into digital claims and send those claims to each other directly. No third coin sits in the middle. That is not a rumor, a leak, or an interpretation. It is the design, and it is the most consequential piece of information the $XRP thesis has received since the SEC dropped its appeal.What followed was five days of the loudest argument the $XRP community has had in years, conducted almost entirely over a resurfaced slide and a two-word post from a man who no longer works there. That argument is worth walking through, because the way it is being fought reveals more than the thing being fought over. The details matter, because the gap between what was announced and what was believed became its own story within hours. Fifteen years of argument reduced to a design document. Swift built the blockchain. It went live with the exact banks the thesis named. And it moves tokenized deposits, because banks would rather settle in money they issue themselves than in an asset whose price can move against them between the send and the receive. The $XRP community will spend this week debating a resurfaced slide and a former executive’s two-word post, and both of those things are more interesting than the ledger, and neither of them matters. The slide is undated. The executive is gone. The ledger is live. What is left is the smaller question, the one that has quietly been the only real one for two years: not whether Ripple wins, because Ripple is winning, but whether anything Ripple wins reaches the token. On July 9 the largest institution in cross-border payments answered that question in the most expensive way available, by building the future and leaving $XRP out of the blueprint.The thesis is not dead. It is just no longer a thesis about Swift. #write2earn🌐💹 #receita_federal #GalaToMoon #Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️ #OopsieDaisy

For fifteen years the loudest promise in crypto was that $XRP would replace Swift. Not complement it

It was the thesis that sold the token, filled the conference halls, and outlasted a five-year lawsuit.On July 9, 2026, Swift answered.
The network moved its own blockchain ledger into live operation with seventeen pioneer banks, among them Citi, HSBC, Wells Fargo, UBS, Standard Chartered, and MUFG. The build took nine months. The system runs 24 hours a day across six continents, coordinating cross-border payments on a shared ledger that eliminates the batch windows and cut-off times that made correspondent banking feel like a fax machine. It is, by any fair reading, Swift doing the thing everyone said Swift would never do: shipping blockchain settlement, at scale, with the incumbents, before the disruptor could take the market.
And the asset moving across it is tokenized bank deposits. Not $XRP. Not any public token. Banks convert dollars and euros they already hold into digital claims and send those claims to each other directly. No third coin sits in the middle.
That is not a rumor, a leak, or an interpretation. It is the design, and it is the most consequential piece of information the $XRP thesis has received since the SEC dropped its appeal.What followed was five days of the loudest argument the $XRP community has had in years, conducted almost entirely over a resurfaced slide and a two-word post from a man who no longer works there. That argument is worth walking through, because the way it is being fought reveals more than the thing being fought over.
The details matter, because the gap between what was announced and what was believed became its own story within hours.
Fifteen years of argument reduced to a design document. Swift built the blockchain. It went live with the exact banks the thesis named. And it moves tokenized deposits, because banks would rather settle in money they issue themselves than in an asset whose price can move against them between the send and the receive.
The $XRP community will spend this week debating a resurfaced slide and a former executive’s two-word post, and both of those things are more interesting than the ledger, and neither of them matters. The slide is undated. The executive is gone. The ledger is live.
What is left is the smaller question, the one that has quietly been the only real one for two years: not whether Ripple wins, because Ripple is winning, but whether anything Ripple wins reaches the token. On July 9 the largest institution in cross-border payments answered that question in the most expensive way available, by building the future and leaving $XRP out of the blueprint.The thesis is not dead. It is just no longer a thesis about Swift.
#write2earn🌐💹
#receita_federal
#GalaToMoon
#Jasmyusdt⚠️⚠️
#OopsieDaisy
Partly True
Article
Cardano Surpasses TRON in ETF Demand as Over $44M Flows Into ADA Investment ProductsAccording to data compiled by Blockworks, Cardano-linked ETFs recorded $37.2 million in net inflows during 2025. The momentum has continued into the current year, with the products already attracting over $6.9 million in additional net inflows. In contrast, investment products tied to TRON experienced substantial capital outflows over the same period. Blockworks data shows that TRON ETFs lost $33.38 million in 2025, while investors withdrew another $17.47 million from TRX-linked funds this year. The contrasting performance suggests that institutional and professional investors continue allocating capital to Cardano despite broader market volatility. Cardano’s ETPs currently manage $48.3 million in assets under management (AUM) across eight active investment products. Some of the top offerings include 21Shares Cardano ETP (AADA), WisdomTree Physical Cardano, and Bitwise Physical Cardano ETP (RDAN) These regulated investment products trade outside the United States, allowing investors in multiple international markets to gain exposure to $ADA without directly buying or holding the cryptocurrency. Moreover, recent investment activity also favors Cardano. Over the past 30 days, the eight Cardano ETPs attracted $1.17 million in fresh capital. Meanwhile, TRON’s exchange-traded investment products brought in just $534,000 during the same period. The gap also extends to overall assets under management. While Cardano’s eight ETPs oversee $48.3 million in AUM, TRON currently has only two active ETPs with a combined $29 million in AUM. The latest inflows have drawn attention across the Cardano community because they originate entirely from markets outside the United States. Although U.S. investors still lack access to a spot Cardano ETF, Grayscale has already filed an application for one. Market observers expect the U.S. SEC to decide on the proposal later this year. Current expectations point to a potential decision by October 2026, provided the regulatory timeline remains on schedule. The process gained momentum after CME Group launched Cardano futures in February 2026, triggering the SEC’s six-month regulated market observation period. Once that requirement concludes on August 9, 2026, $ADA will satisfy a key eligibility criterion for consideration for spot ETFs. If the SEC reviews Grayscale’s application under its streamlined 75-day approval framework, the agency could issue a final decision as early as October 23, 2026. #EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin #FactCheck #DelistingAlert #HyperliquidFalls10.28% #PEPEATH

Cardano Surpasses TRON in ETF Demand as Over $44M Flows Into ADA Investment Products

According to data compiled by Blockworks, Cardano-linked ETFs recorded $37.2 million in net inflows during 2025. The momentum has continued into the current year, with the products already attracting over $6.9 million in additional net inflows.
In contrast, investment products tied to TRON experienced substantial capital outflows over the same period. Blockworks data shows that TRON ETFs lost $33.38 million in 2025, while investors withdrew another $17.47 million from TRX-linked funds this year.
The contrasting performance suggests that institutional and professional investors continue allocating capital to Cardano despite broader market volatility.
Cardano’s ETPs currently manage $48.3 million in assets under management (AUM) across eight active investment products. Some of the top offerings include 21Shares Cardano ETP (AADA), WisdomTree Physical Cardano, and Bitwise Physical Cardano ETP (RDAN)
These regulated investment products trade outside the United States, allowing investors in multiple international markets to gain exposure to $ADA without directly buying or holding the cryptocurrency.
Moreover, recent investment activity also favors Cardano. Over the past 30 days, the eight Cardano ETPs attracted $1.17 million in fresh capital. Meanwhile, TRON’s exchange-traded investment products brought in just $534,000 during the same period.
The gap also extends to overall assets under management. While Cardano’s eight ETPs oversee $48.3 million in AUM, TRON currently has only two active ETPs with a combined $29 million in AUM.
The latest inflows have drawn attention across the Cardano community because they originate entirely from markets outside the United States.
Although U.S. investors still lack access to a spot Cardano ETF, Grayscale has already filed an application for one. Market observers expect the U.S. SEC to decide on the proposal later this year.
Current expectations point to a potential decision by October 2026, provided the regulatory timeline remains on schedule. The process gained momentum after CME Group launched Cardano futures in February 2026, triggering the SEC’s six-month regulated market observation period. Once that requirement concludes on August 9, 2026, $ADA will satisfy a key eligibility criterion for consideration for spot ETFs.
If the SEC reviews Grayscale’s application under its streamlined 75-day approval framework, the agency could issue a final decision as early as October 23, 2026.
#EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin
#FactCheck
#DelistingAlert
#HyperliquidFalls10.28%
#PEPEATH
Partly True
Article
Who is buying every Pi dip? The 400M PI whaleOne anonymous wallet has spent a year absorbing the supply that everyone else is selling. It is now the largest single holder of PI, nobody has claimed it, and at today’s price it is sitting on one of the worst trades in the token’s short history. The whale story points at something larger and more awkward than one address. Pi Network’s founding promise was democratic distribution: a currency anyone could mine from a phone, with no expensive hardware and no venture allocation. The on-chain reality of ownership looks nothing like that. PiScan data has shown just 22 wallets qualifying as whales holding at least 10 million PI each, alongside millions of accounts holding almost nothing. Roughly 84% of the more than 15.9 million accounts fall into the smallest category, holding less than 10 PI, worth pocket change. The Pi Foundation’s own top wallet has held tens of billions of coins. Set that against the token’s marketing and the tension is obvious. A network built on the pitch of mass participation has produced an ownership structure where a handful of addresses, most of them associated with the foundation, dominate supply, and where the largest independent accumulator is an entity that will not identify itself. That is a decentralization question with real regulatory weight, given that market-structure legislation moving through Congress contemplates decentralization tests for classifying digital assets. Pi’s defenders point to millions of migrated wallets and a vast know-your-customer base as evidence of genuine distribution. The rich list points the other way. None of this is unique to Pi, and every major token has concentration issues. But most of them never claimed otherwise. The gap between the people’s-cryptocurrency framing and a wallet map dominated by whales and microbes is the kind of thing that becomes a problem precisely when price stops going up, because that is when holders start reading the ledger instead of the roadmap. Fourteen million accounts holding less than four dollars each is not a distributed economy. It is a marketing funnel with a blockchain attached. It is worth taking the Core Team theory seriously for a moment and following it to its conclusion, because if it is true the implications reach well past one wallet. Token buybacks are ordinary corporate behavior in crypto. Projects with treasury reserves routinely purchase their own tokens to support price, absorb unlock supply, or retire float, and several of the largest names in the sector run formal buy-and-burn programs that they disclose openly. The mechanism is not the problem. Disclosure is. Pi’s approach to supply management is unusual in a way that makes the whale theory more plausible. The project leans on halvings and a declining mining rate instead of burns, which means it has no mechanism for permanently destroying supply, a difference that matters when looking at why Pi has no burn valve for supply. Every coin ever mined eventually reaches circulation through migration and unlocks. A project in that position, watching roughly 6.5 million tokens hit the float daily with no burn valve to relieve pressure, has exactly one lever left if it wants to defend price, which is to buy the tokens back with treasury funds and sit on them. That is precisely the behavior $GAS…ODM exhibits. The second is attribution. Any confirmation of ownership, whether from the Core Team acknowledging a buyback program or an exchange claiming the address, would immediately reprice the narrative in one direction or the other. Silence has served the bullish reading well, because an unattributed whale can be whatever the community needs it to be. Clarity would remove that optionality. The third is whether the supply math changes at all. Roughly 1.21 billion PI enter circulation across 2026, with the next tranche reported above 127 million tokens, up from about 103.7 million the previous month. Absorbing that requires demand the ecosystem has not yet produced, and the Pi2Day fee-in-PI products are the project’s first real attempt to create demand that exists independent of speculation. If those products show genuine usage measured in actual fees rather than announcements, the whale’s thesis, whatever it is, gets stronger. If they do not, then one wallet is holding a position that gets larger and less valuable every month, and the most-watched address in the Pi ecosystem will end up as a case study in how supply design shapes price and how much money it takes to fail to hold a line. #HYPEFalls8% #EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin #USInsiderSellingNearsRecordPace #MSCIEMIndexNearsCorrection #FootballSeason2026

Who is buying every Pi dip? The 400M PI whale

One anonymous wallet has spent a year absorbing the supply that everyone else is selling. It is now the largest single holder of PI, nobody has claimed it, and at today’s price it is sitting on one of the worst trades in the token’s short history.
The whale story points at something larger and more awkward than one address. Pi Network’s founding promise was democratic distribution: a currency anyone could mine from a phone, with no expensive hardware and no venture allocation. The on-chain reality of ownership looks nothing like that. PiScan data has shown just 22 wallets qualifying as whales holding at least 10 million PI each, alongside millions of accounts holding almost nothing. Roughly 84% of the more than 15.9 million accounts fall into the smallest category, holding less than 10 PI, worth pocket change. The Pi Foundation’s own top wallet has held tens of billions of coins.
Set that against the token’s marketing and the tension is obvious. A network built on the pitch of mass participation has produced an ownership structure where a handful of addresses, most of them associated with the foundation, dominate supply, and where the largest independent accumulator is an entity that will not identify itself. That is a decentralization question with real regulatory weight, given that market-structure legislation moving through Congress contemplates decentralization tests for classifying digital assets. Pi’s defenders point to millions of migrated wallets and a vast know-your-customer base as evidence of genuine distribution. The rich list points the other way.
None of this is unique to Pi, and every major token has concentration issues. But most of them never claimed otherwise. The gap between the people’s-cryptocurrency framing and a wallet map dominated by whales and microbes is the kind of thing that becomes a problem precisely when price stops going up, because that is when holders start reading the ledger instead of the roadmap. Fourteen million accounts holding less than four dollars each is not a distributed economy. It is a marketing funnel with a blockchain attached.
It is worth taking the Core Team theory seriously for a moment and following it to its conclusion, because if it is true the implications reach well past one wallet. Token buybacks are ordinary corporate behavior in crypto. Projects with treasury reserves routinely purchase their own tokens to support price, absorb unlock supply, or retire float, and several of the largest names in the sector run formal buy-and-burn programs that they disclose openly. The mechanism is not the problem. Disclosure is.
Pi’s approach to supply management is unusual in a way that makes the whale theory more plausible. The project leans on halvings and a declining mining rate instead of burns, which means it has no mechanism for permanently destroying supply, a difference that matters when looking at why Pi has no burn valve for supply. Every coin ever mined eventually reaches circulation through migration and unlocks. A project in that position, watching roughly 6.5 million tokens hit the float daily with no burn valve to relieve pressure, has exactly one lever left if it wants to defend price, which is to buy the tokens back with treasury funds and sit on them. That is precisely the behavior $GAS…ODM exhibits.
The second is attribution. Any confirmation of ownership, whether from the Core Team acknowledging a buyback program or an exchange claiming the address, would immediately reprice the narrative in one direction or the other. Silence has served the bullish reading well, because an unattributed whale can be whatever the community needs it to be. Clarity would remove that optionality.
The third is whether the supply math changes at all. Roughly 1.21 billion PI enter circulation across 2026, with the next tranche reported above 127 million tokens, up from about 103.7 million the previous month. Absorbing that requires demand the ecosystem has not yet produced, and the Pi2Day fee-in-PI products are the project’s first real attempt to create demand that exists independent of speculation. If those products show genuine usage measured in actual fees rather than announcements, the whale’s thesis, whatever it is, gets stronger. If they do not, then one wallet is holding a position that gets larger and less valuable every month, and the most-watched address in the Pi ecosystem will end up as a case study in how supply design shapes price and how much money it takes to fail to hold a line.
#HYPEFalls8%
#EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin
#USInsiderSellingNearsRecordPace
#MSCIEMIndexNearsCorrection
#FootballSeason2026
Article
XRP Ledger Hits Yet Another Growth MilestoneThe $XRP Ledger has reached another major adoption milestone, surpassing 8 million activated accounts.Every activated $XRP Ledger account must permanently lock up a minimum amount of $XRP as a base reserve before it can transact. This sets it apart from other blockchain networks. This anti-spam mechanism prevents the network from being flooded with empty or malicious accounts while ensuring each account has a small economic stake in the ecosystem. The current base reserve is 1 $XRP, meaning that at least 8 million $XRP are now locked across activated accounts alone. While those tokens remain owned by account holders, they cannot be freely spent unless the account is deleted, effectively removing a portion of $XRP from active circulation. Community member Krippenreiter noted that adoption has remained remarkably consistent. "Every single day around ~2500 new XRPL accounts get created." They all need at least 1 $XRP to be locked away and marked as 'unspendable' for the base reserve to activate and maintain an active account on the $XRP Ledger." This week, Ripple joined the Linux Foundation's x402 Foundation. The initiative aims to establish an open standard for machine-to-machine payments over the internet. Meanwhile, Ripple's regulated RLUSD stablecoin continues to gain adoption across enterprise finance. #FootballSeason2026 #EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin

XRP Ledger Hits Yet Another Growth Milestone

The $XRP Ledger has reached another major adoption milestone, surpassing 8 million activated accounts.Every activated $XRP Ledger account must permanently lock up a minimum amount of $XRP as a base reserve before it can transact. This sets it apart from other blockchain networks.
This anti-spam mechanism prevents the network from being flooded with empty or malicious accounts while ensuring each account has a small economic stake in the ecosystem.
The current base reserve is 1 $XRP, meaning that at least 8 million $XRP are now locked across activated accounts alone. While those tokens remain owned by account holders, they cannot be freely spent unless the account is deleted, effectively removing a portion of $XRP from active circulation.
Community member Krippenreiter noted that adoption has remained remarkably consistent. "Every single day around ~2500 new XRPL accounts get created."
They all need at least 1 $XRP to be locked away and marked as 'unspendable' for the base reserve to activate and maintain an active account on the $XRP Ledger."
This week, Ripple joined the Linux Foundation's x402 Foundation. The initiative aims to establish an open standard for machine-to-machine payments over the internet.
Meanwhile, Ripple's regulated RLUSD stablecoin continues to gain adoption across enterprise finance.
#FootballSeason2026
#EtherFallsTwiceAsHardAsBitcoin
Verified
Article
Pi Network Schedules Protocol v25 Upgrade After 27% Pi Price DropAfter six weeks of silence, the Pi Network Team has finally confirmed the launch of Protocol v25 on July 22. The update introduces new privacy tools and network improvements. This came at a time when Pi Coin continues to struggle after falling more than 27% in just one week. The Pi Core Team said Protocol v25 is one of the biggest network upgrades this year. Its main goal is to make the Pi blockchain more stable, reliable, and ready for future applications. One of the biggest changes is support for privacy-preserving smart contracts. These allow developers to build apps where users can verify information without sharing personal details. For example, a user could prove their identity or eligibility without uploading sensitive documents. This is made possible through two new technologies, BN254 cryptography and Poseidon hashing, which make zero-knowledge applications much easier to build. Although Protocol v25 is an important technical upgrade, many investors are wondering if it can help Pi Coin recover. The update is expected to improve the Pi Network ecosystem and make it easier for developers to build new apps, which could increase network activity. However, it is unlikely to have a major impact on Pi’s price in the long term. A short-term price jump is possible, but a sustained rally remains difficult. The biggest reason is the growing token supply. According to PiScan data, more than 775.8 million Pi is scheduled to unlock between July and December 2026, adding more selling pressure to the market. As of now, Pi Coin has fallen more than 27% over the past week, including another 10% drop today, with the price trading near $0.07. $NVDAB $NVDA.US $AAPL.US

Pi Network Schedules Protocol v25 Upgrade After 27% Pi Price Drop

After six weeks of silence, the Pi Network Team has finally confirmed the launch of Protocol v25 on July 22. The update introduces new privacy tools and network improvements. This came at a time when Pi Coin continues to struggle after falling more than 27% in just one week.
The Pi Core Team said Protocol v25 is one of the biggest network upgrades this year. Its main goal is to make the Pi blockchain more stable, reliable, and ready for future applications.
One of the biggest changes is support for privacy-preserving smart contracts. These allow developers to build apps where users can verify information without sharing personal details.
For example, a user could prove their identity or eligibility without uploading sensitive documents. This is made possible through two new technologies, BN254 cryptography and Poseidon hashing, which make zero-knowledge applications much easier to build.
Although Protocol v25 is an important technical upgrade, many investors are wondering if it can help Pi Coin recover.
The update is expected to improve the Pi Network ecosystem and make it easier for developers to build new apps, which could increase network activity. However, it is unlikely to have a major impact on Pi’s price in the long term. A short-term price jump is possible, but a sustained rally remains difficult.
The biggest reason is the growing token supply. According to PiScan data, more than 775.8 million Pi is scheduled to unlock between July and December 2026, adding more selling pressure to the market.
As of now, Pi Coin has fallen more than 27% over the past week, including another 10% drop today, with the price trading near $0.07.
$NVDAB
$NVDA.US
$AAPL.US
NVDAonAlpha
NVDA+0.46%
NVDAUS-2.39%
Partly True
Article
Kalshi Traders Bet on XLM to Beat XRP This YearStellar ($XLM) has continued to gain traction as the fast-growing altcoin remains one of the top-performing cryptocurrencies that have been barely overwhelmed by the extreme market volatility. With $XLM consistently projecting strong price movements even on days when the market seems uncertain, traders are beginning to weigh in on its possible future outcome against its rival, $XRP. Although the difference is relatively small, it suggests that market sentiment is a bit in favor of $XLM and traders are showing more confidence in Stellar's performance over the remainder of the year despite $XRP's growing social hype. While the odds appear to be pretty close, historical data further backs $XLM's chances of outperforming $XRP for the remaining part of the year.So far in 2026, $XLM has only decreased by 5.99%, while $XRP is down by a massive 39.8%, positioning the former way ahead in terms of their year-to-date price performance. #FootballSeason2026 #HyperliquidFalls10.28% #SKHynixSamsungFallInOffshoreMarkets #AsianStocksFallForSecondDay #KoreaEWYETFSeesRecordInflow

Kalshi Traders Bet on XLM to Beat XRP This Year

Stellar ($XLM) has continued to gain traction as the fast-growing altcoin remains one of the top-performing cryptocurrencies that have been barely overwhelmed by the extreme market volatility.
With $XLM consistently projecting strong price movements even on days when the market seems uncertain, traders are beginning to weigh in on its possible future outcome against its rival, $XRP.
Although the difference is relatively small, it suggests that market sentiment is a bit in favor of $XLM and traders are showing more confidence in Stellar's performance over the remainder of the year despite $XRP's growing social hype.
While the odds appear to be pretty close, historical data further backs $XLM's chances of outperforming $XRP for the remaining part of the year.So far in 2026, $XLM has only decreased by 5.99%, while $XRP is down by a massive 39.8%, positioning the former way ahead in terms of their year-to-date price performance.
#FootballSeason2026
#HyperliquidFalls10.28%
#SKHynixSamsungFallInOffshoreMarkets
#AsianStocksFallForSecondDay
#KoreaEWYETFSeesRecordInflow
XLM+0.98%
XRP+0.54%
EWYETF-0.77%
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs