cryptonewss

Regulation in crypto is a double-edged sword. On the upside, tighter rules give institutional investors more confidence, pulling smart money into the market. On the downside, compliance gets heavier.
Nothing illustrates this better than the latest crypto bill cutting stablecoin rewards. Fears that the policy could jeopardize the global banking system caused a market buzz; even Circle’s CEO wasn’t happy about it.
Now, the same regulatory FUD is starting to hit privacy coins. U.S. President Donald Trump, with David Sacks as crypto czar, is creating stricter rules for digital assets, and these tighter rules are coming at the worst possible time.
For context, the 2025 cycle was a huge turnaround for privacy coins. Zcash [ZEC] saw a staggering 800% rally, showing just how much traction privacy-focused assets could get as investors chased secure transactions.
Fast forward to today, and exchanges are rushing to delist these coins. In a recent move, India’s exchanges have started removing Zcash and other privacy-focused assets, raising the question: What exactly changed?
Regulation is stepping in. Stricter rules mean heavier compliance, and with ZEC already down 45%, it’s clear these coins are running into serious headwinds. The question now is: Are we heading toward a full-on “ban”?
Privacy coins under pressure as new rules end anonymity
The key feature of privacy coins is that they allow transactions to remain anonymous. Why does this matter to investors? Anonymity protects financial privacy. This makes these coins especially appealing.
But what happens when that key feature comes under pressure? Under the latest U.S. policy, FinCEN, the Treasury’s AML/CTF watchdog, is cracking down on these assets, enforcing compliance to keep the system safe.
To do this, the policy requires adherence to anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) rules. The result? Privacy coins can’t guarantee anonymity anymore, and that was their biggest selling point.
XMR
In this context, the double-digit drops across top privacy coins on the weekly charts aren’t a fluke. In fact, Monero [XMR], the top coin by market cap, has lost over $1 billion this week alone, dropping back to Q4 levels.
From a technical perspective, investors are clearly spooked.
On the regulatory side, however, President Trump and crypto czar David Sacks are stepping in, and with AML and KYC rules moving toward federal enforcement, a full “ban” on privacy coins doesn’t feel too far off.
Final Thoughts
Stricter 2026 U.S. rules and mandatory AML/KYC compliance are making anonymous transactions nearly impossible, hitting coins like Monero and Zcash hard.
Top privacy coins have seen double-digit drops, with Monero losing over $1 billion this week alone, as investors fear tighter regulation could lead to a full “ban.”
#TRUMP #cryptooinsigts #CryptoNewss #Binance

🚨 💥 عاجل: براد جارلينغهاوس يُدرَج ضمن لجنة CFTC هذه هي أولمبياد لجان العملات الرقمية! 🇺🇸📊

في خطوة تاريخية تُعد من أهم محطات صناعة العملات الرقمية في أمريكا حتى الآن، أعلن رسمياً أن براد جارلينغهاوس الرئيس التنفيذي لشركة Ripple أصبح عضوًا في لجنة تداول السلع الآجلة الأمريكية (CFTC) في إطار لجنة العملات الرقمية.
جارلينغهاوس علّق على هذا الانضمام بقوله:

هذه هي أولمبياد لجان العملات الرقمية.
في إشارة إلى أن السباق التنظيمي العالمي قد بدأ بالفعل، وأن الولايات المتحدة تدخل مرحلة جديدة من هيكلة السوق الرقمية 🧩🔥.

📌 لماذا هذا الخبر مهم جدًا؟

🔹 CFTC هي واحدة من أهم الهيئات التنظيمية في واشنطن عندما يتعلق الأمر بالأصول الرقمية والسلع الرقمية.
🔹 وجود جارلينغهاوس في اللجنة يعني أن أحد أصحاب الخبرة العملية المباشرة في سوق البلوكشين والتسويات المالية العالمية أصبح جزءًا من صنع القرار.
🔹 هذا ليس مجرد تمثيل، بل إشارة مباشرة إلى أن النظام المالي التقليدي يعترف بضرورة إشراك صناع السوق في صياغة القواعد.

🧠 ما الذي يعنيه وصفه بأولمبياد لجان العملات الرقمية؟

عندما يقول جارلينغهاوس هذا، فهو لا يقصد منافسة رياضية
بل مرحلة تنافس تنظيمي عالمي على مستوى:

🏛️ قوانين العملات الرقمية
📄 تراخيص العملات المستقرة
⚖️ معايير حماية المستثمر
💱 قواعد تداول وساطة مؤسساتية
🌍 شبكات تسوية عبر الحدود

هذه “الأولمبياد” ليست بين ريبل وشركات أخرى…
بل بين النظم المالية القديمة وجيل جديد من الأنظمة الرقمية.

🏦 لماذا اختيار Garrett مهم؟

براد ليس مجرد قائد مشروع تقني
هو:
✔️ يتعامل مباشرة مع بنوك مركزية
✔️ لديه خبرة عميقة في السياسات النقدية الرقمية
✔️ قاد محادثات مع الهيئات التنظيمية في أمريكا وأوروبا وآسيا
✔️ يُعتَبَر من أكثر الأصوات تأثيرًا في وضع أطر للعملات الرقمية

وجوده داخل CFTC يعني أن:
➡️ الرسائل المبطنة لم تعد تُكتب خارج اللجنة
➡️ هناك صوت تقني عملي داخل مائدة القرار
➡️ اتجاهات السوق لن تُقرّر إلا بعد أن تُسمَع حقيقة التكنولوجيا

📈 لماذا الآن؟ ما السياق الأكبر؟

🔹 1) سباق تنظيمي عالمي

بين أمريكا، الاتحاد الأوروبي، بريطانيا، والشرق الأوسط
كل جهة تحاول أن تضع أطر واضحة قبل أن تتفوق أنظمة أخرى في جذب السيولة المؤسسية.

🔹 2) CLARITY Act & إطار أمريكي جديد

القوانين قيد النقاش لم تعد فقط لتحكم العملات
بل لتحدد من يستطيع العمل، وكيف، وتحت أي رقابة.

جارلينغهاوس داخل CFTC يشير إلى أن القطاع التجاري الرقمي والإداري اليوم هو جزء من الحكومة الفعلية غدًا.

🧨 تأثيرات متوقعة على السوق

📍 XRP وStablecoins مؤسسية:
وجود جارلينغهاوس في CFTC يعني تسريع الاعتراف بالأطر التنظيمية لـ:

XRPL

RLUSD

سلاسل تسوية مؤسسية

ودائع مؤسسية عبر البنوك

📍 سيولة أوسع للسوق:
القرارات التنظيمية الواضحة تجذب:
✔️ صناديق تقاعد
✔️ مؤسسات بنكية
✔️ إدارة أصول كبرى

📍 تخفيض المخاطر القانونية للمؤسسات:
هو ما يقود زيادة ضخ السيولة الحقيقية في السوق الرقمية، بدل التداول المضاربي فقط.

🧩 ماذا ينبغي أن تعرف؟

🔹 هذه ليست خطوة انفصالية من ريبل
إنها تحول مؤسسي لأنظمة التمويل القديمة والرقمية بدأت تتكامل فعليًا.

🔹 السوق لا يتجه فقط نحو التنظيم
بل نحو قيادة نظام مالي جديد يقبل العملات الرقمية كجزء أساسي من بنية السيولة العالمية.

🔹 أولمبياد CFTC يعني أننا أمام:
✔️ جولة تشريعية حاسمة
✔️ تحديد من يملك الحق في العمل
✔️ وضع معايير دولية قابلة للتطبيق عبر البنوك والمؤسسات

📌 الخلاصة

براد جارلينغهاوس داخل لجنة CFTC
ليس مجرد تكريم
بل استراتيجية تموضع عالمي.

📍 الولايات المتحدة لا تعد فقط تنظيمًا
📍 بل تخطط لأن تكون المعيار الذهبي في قانون الأصول الرقمية
📍 والجهات التي لديها خبرة تقنية عملية هي من ستصوغ القواعد الفعلية

هذا هو السباق الحقيقي ليس من يملك أكبر عملة رقمية
بل من يملك القوة لصياغة القواعد التي يراد أن تعمل بها. 🌍🔥
#Xrp🔥🔥 #Ripple #CryptoNewss
$XRP

$VANRY is currently consolidating just below a key resistance zone, where sellers previously showed strong activity. Recent price action signals caution as momentum slows near overhead supply.
“Markets reward patience — profits come from respecting resistance.”
🔴 Key Resistance Zone
Resistance Level: 0.0066 – 0.0069
This zone previously triggered sell pressure
Price is facing rejection near moving averages (MAs)
Breakout needs strong volume confirmation
⚠️ Overbought / Rejection Signals
RSI on lower timeframes is moving toward overbought territory
Recent candles show upper-wick rejection
Indicates buyer exhaustion near resistance
🧠 Reason for Caution
Liquidity is thinning near resistance
Failed breakouts can trap late long positions
Price is still below a confirmed structure breakout level
Fundamental progress by @Vanarchain is positive, but price must confirm
🛡️ Safe Trading Advice (Risk-First Approach)
✅ Consider partial profit-taking near resistance
✅ Trail stops on remaining positions
❌ Avoid FOMO entries on green candles
⏳ Wait for a high-volume close above resistance before re-entering
🚀 Final Take
Vanar Chain is building steadily, but price action says respect resistance first. Smart traders protect capital and let confirmation lead the way.
👉 Plan your trade, trade your plan.
👉 Lock profits, protect downside, and wait for confirmation.
@Vanarchain | $VANRY
#vanar #VANRY #CryptoNewss

Bitcoin’s [BTC] recent bear phase has been severe. The crypto has capitulated from a high of about $126,000 to around $68,000 at press time. And yet, this wave of selling pressure may prove pivotal rather than purely destructive.
In fact, market sentiment seemed to suggest that Bitcoin’s decline could approach a reset point – One where the price begins to recover from recent losses based on prevailing on-chain conditions.
Bitcoin closes in on undervaluation
At the time of writing, data from CryptoQuant revealed that Bitcoin’s Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio was nearing undervalued territory.
The MVRV ratio measures whether an asset is overvalued or undervalued by comparing its market capitalization to its realized capitalization, which reflects the value of coins at the price they last moved. When the ratio approaches or drops towards 1, it signals undervaluation.
Bitcoin’s MVRV had a reading of 1.1, close to this critical threshold. The last four times Bitcoin entered this zone, it rebounded and transitioned into a broader rally.
However, entering the undervalued zone does not immediately trigger a rally. The price can continue to trend lower while the MVRV remains near or within this range. Historically, such a phase often marks a period of accumulation, as investors gradually build positions ahead of a sustained upward move.
A confirmed rebound from this zone could set the stage for new highs. If bullish sentiment strengthens and macro or geopolitical conditions stabilize, Bitcoin could regain momentum towards the $100,000-level.
What could push Bitcoin into deeper undervaluation?
Sustained selling remains central to driving Bitcoin further into undervaluation. A hike in supply entering the market, combined with weakening demand, would place additional downward pressure on price.
Institutional investors have been leading the prevailing spree of selling activity. In fact, U.S Spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) continue to record consistent outflows too.
According to Sosovalue data, this is the third time since inception that U.S Spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded four consecutive weeks of net outflows. On a monthly basis, this represented the fourth bearish month for ETF flows.
Over the last two trading sessions, cumulative outflows reached $686.67 million, approaching the $1-billion mark. These flows implied that investors have been realizing profits or cutting losses on their Bitcoin holdings. If demand remains subdued, sustained selling could push the crypto towards cheaper levels.
Spot market activity seemed to reinforce this weakness too. According to CoinGlass, that demand dropped from $1.02 billion to $89.73 million on 12 February, with net selling being dominant over that period.
Long-term holders remain critical
Long-term holders could play a decisive role in shaping Bitcoin’s next move. Their willingness to accumulate may determine whether the market stabilizes and transitions into recovery.
The Binary Coin Days Destroyed (CDD), which tracks whether long-term holders move their coins, had a reading of 0 at press time. This hinted at relative calm among this cohort, indicating limited large-scale distribution.
Finally, the ratio of long-term holders (LTH) to short-term holders (STH) fell too, implying that short-term holders have been selling more aggressively than long-term investors.
If long-term holders maintain conviction while short-term selling exhausts itself, Bitcoin’s approach towards undervaluation may ultimately serve as the foundation for a broader market rebound.
Final Summary
Bitcoin’s MVRV highlighted the asset approaching undervalued territory – A level that has preceded rallies on four previous occasions.Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows may accelerate Bitcoin’s move towards undervaluation.
$BTC #CryptoNewss #cryptooinsigts #Write2Earn

FOGO: The Speed King of Layer 1? 🚀
$FOGO is making waves as a Solana-compatible Layer 1, boasting a 40ms block time and 100k+ TPS. Since its Jan 15 mainnet launch, it’s become a DeFi hotspot with the Binance Spring Earn Fiesta now live—offering a share of $1M in rewards! 🎁
Market Snapshot:
Price: ~$0.022 (Consolidating after Jan ATH of $0.062)
Trend: Oversold RSI suggests a potential reversal.
Watch: Airdrop claims close April 15; institutional unlocks start Sept 26.
High-speed trading is here. Is $FOGO in your bag? 📉🔥 $FOGO
#fogo #CryptoNewss #BinanceSquareTalks #defi

RLUSD’s expansion began after its December 2024 launch, as early exchange listings built baseline circulation and pushed the market cap beyond $1 billion. Subsequently, Binance’s January 2026 listing marked a structural liquidity inflection, expanding access through global distribution and zero-fee trading incentives.
Trading volumes and exchange reserves then climbed as custodial deposits seeded supply. Shortly after, withdrawal activation enabled on-chain migration. On 12 February, XRPL integration opened deposit rails while liquidity matured.

Consequently, Binance strengthened stablecoin market share, while the XRP Ledger gained settlement depth.
Together, these developments are advancing RLUSD’s cross-border payment utility and multi-network circulation.
Issuance dynamics balance RLUSD liquidity expansion
Supply expansion extended the earlier exchange-driven momentum, as RLUSD’s circulation climbed to roughly $1.52 billion by mid-February 2026. This growth was propelled by Binance onboarding, institutional inflows, and payment corridor seeding.
Issuance scaled through treasury mints of 59 million, 28.2 million, and 35 million, routing liquidity into exchanges and DeFi rails as demand intensified.
Alongside this expansion, measured burns—such as 2.5 million on Ethereum [ETH]—tempered oversupply – Reinforcing peg stability above 103% collateralization.

Chain allocation then clarified deployment intent. Ethereum absorbed nearly $1.2 billion, or 77–79%, driven by liquidity provisioning and collateral utility. XRPL held about $348 million, or 22–23%, reflecting settlement routing.
As XRPL deposits opened, cross-border throughput improved. This dual expansion deepened exchange liquidity, strengthened DeFi rails, and advanced payment infrastructure across both ecosystems.
On-chain velocity and liquidity utilization efficiency
RLUSD’s circulation scaled to roughly $1.52 billion by mid-February 2026, remaining small compared to Tether’s [USDT] $185 billion dominance. However, on-chain behavior began diverging early. Transfer activity accelerated, with about $6.3 billion moving monthly.
On the contrary, USDT processed far larger absolute flows but showed lower per-unit velocity due to its vast circulating base. Much of USDT’s liquidity has been parked across exchanges, derivatives venues, and DeFi collateral pools. RLUSD flows, meanwhile, rotated more actively through settlement corridors.
Chain distribution reinforced this split. Ethereum balances leaned towards liquidity provisioning, while XRPL allocations processed faster payment routing. Exchange reserves also thinned faster relative to supply, signaling migration towards utility endpoints.
Finally, institutional treasury settlements and cross-border transfers have driven a larger share of movement. Sucb a comparison frames RLUSD less as a trading stablecoin and more as a settlement-optimized instrument. One operating alongside USDT’s market-dominant liquidity role.
Final Summary
RLUSD’s growth transitioned from exchange circulation to settlement utility as Binance access, elastic issuance, and XRPL rails converted supply into payment capacity.Liquidity deployment underlined functional specialization, with Ethereum anchoring collateral depth while XRPL drove settlement velocity beside USDT.
#thanksbinance #CryptoNewss #cryptooinsigts #Binance

After rallying to $27, Decred [DCR] was rejected and dropped sharply to a local low of $21. The trend then reversed, with DCR climbing to a local high of $25.34 before pulling back slightly.
At press time, DCR traded at $24.12, marking an 11.72% daily gain. Over the same period, its market capitalization returned to the $400 million level, reflecting stronger capital inflows.
Decred bulls step in to defend key levels
After DCR dropped to a low of $21, it jumped into the market and bought, thus effectively defending key levels. 
In fact, Buyer’s strength rose to 62 and has remained above 60 for two consecutive days. At the same time, sellers’ dominance declined to 37.  This shift in power dynamics reflected investors’ conviction, as buyers signalled their anticipation of further gains. 

Coupled with that, the Accumulation and Distribution Volume showed a higher accumulation rate for the first time in two days. At press time, Volume Moving Average rose to 93k, with the Volume and A/D volume jumping to 40k and 14k, respectively. 
An increase in the accumulation volume indicated that sellers were displacing the market. Buy-Sell Volume further validated this fact, with buy volume increasing to 22.85k.  
At the same time, the altcoin’s sell volume dropped to 18.78k, leaving the market with a positive buy-sell delta. A net buying holding at 31 was a clear sign of aggressive spot accumulation.
Historically, increased accumulation has tended to accelerate upside momentum, often a precursor to higher prices.
Is the upside momentum sustainable for DCR?
Decred experienced a trend reversal as buyers stepped into the market, bought the dip, and avoided further downside pressure.
As a result of the Buyer’s pressure, the altcoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) made a bullish crossover, hiking from 55 to 59 as of writing.
With the RSI edging into bullish territory, this suggests renewed market demand. At the same time, its Directional Movement Index (DMI) hovered at 27.

The rising DMI indicated strengthened upward momentum driven by buyers. Such market conditions leave DCR in a healthy position with a high likelihood of a trend continuation.
Therefore, if the recently observed demand holds, Decred could flip $25 and target $27, where it was previously rejected. However, if momentum slows, creating a profit-taking window, DCR could pull back toward $20 again.
Final Thoughts
DCR rebounded from a $21 slip, rising 11.7% to a local high of 25.34, then retraced to $24.12 at press time. Decred saw a trend reversal as buyers stepped in with conviction, bought the dip, and defended key levels. 
#DCR #cryptooinsigts #CryptoNewss #Binance