I have always found it strange how, in crypto, asking for accountability can sometimes be treated as a lack of support.
You question how a project handles its funds, and suddenly you are spreading FUD. You ask about the team's allocation, and people tell you to trust the developers. You raise a concern, and someone reminds you that you chose to invest.
But supporting a project should not mean switching off your ability to think critically.
You can believe in what a team is building and still question its decisions. You can support the vision without agreeing with everything the team does. And you can want a project to succeed while expecting the people behind it to be accountable for their actions.
Trust should not require silence.
If a project is genuinely building something worth supporting, reasonable questions should be part of the process, not treated as an attack.
You question how a project handles its funds, and suddenly you are spreading FUD. You ask about the team's allocation, and people tell you to trust the developers. You raise a concern, and someone reminds you that you chose to invest.
But supporting a project should not mean switching off your ability to think critically.
You can believe in what a team is building and still question its decisions. You can support the vision without agreeing with everything the team does. And you can want a project to succeed while expecting the people behind it to be accountable for their actions.
Trust should not require silence.
If a project is genuinely building something worth supporting, reasonable questions should be part of the process, not treated as an attack.