$TUT WHAT IF THE NARRATIVE CAME AFTER THE TOKEN
I’ve been digging deeper into Tutorial ($TUT ), and its origin story is interesting.
NOT an accusation. Some points are speculation based on public and on-chain data.WHAT IS TUT? Today, TUT is positioned as an AI/Web3 education project focused on blockchain learning, AI tools and onboarding users into Web3.But its origin appears different.TUT reportedly started as a tutorial/demo showing how to create and deploy a token on BNB Chain. The project itself says it “all began with a simple tutorial video.”That raises an important question: Did the token come first, and the larger narrative come later?
THE EVOLUTION One possible sequence: tutorial token → community discovers it → trading interest grows → attention increases → broader AI/Web3 education narrative develops → liquidity and exchange exposure expand.This is a theory, not a confirmed fact.It doesn’t automatically make TUT a bad project. Crypto projects evolve. But investors should distinguish between what TUT originally was and what it wants to become today.THE BIGGEST QUESTION: WHO CONTROLS THE SUPPLY?TUT’s holder concentration looks extremely high. However, exchange wallets and the burn address account for a large portion, so saying “whales control everything” would be misleading.The real question is the major non-exchange wallets.One wallet reportedly holds around 219M TUT, roughly 22% of max supply.Who controls it? Team, early contributor, market maker, investor, or something else?Until that wallet is identified, I wouldn’t call this manipulation. But it is a major due-diligence point because whoever controls it could materially affect available supply and selling pressure.WHAT I WANT TO KNOW How many real users does the platform have? What are the actual products and revenues? How much value does TUT capture from the ecosystem? Who controls the major wallets? And how much of the current valuation comes from actual utility versus liquidity and speculation?
These questions matter more than short-term price action
I’ve been digging deeper into Tutorial ($TUT ), and its origin story is interesting.
NOT an accusation. Some points are speculation based on public and on-chain data.WHAT IS TUT? Today, TUT is positioned as an AI/Web3 education project focused on blockchain learning, AI tools and onboarding users into Web3.But its origin appears different.TUT reportedly started as a tutorial/demo showing how to create and deploy a token on BNB Chain. The project itself says it “all began with a simple tutorial video.”That raises an important question: Did the token come first, and the larger narrative come later?
THE EVOLUTION One possible sequence: tutorial token → community discovers it → trading interest grows → attention increases → broader AI/Web3 education narrative develops → liquidity and exchange exposure expand.This is a theory, not a confirmed fact.It doesn’t automatically make TUT a bad project. Crypto projects evolve. But investors should distinguish between what TUT originally was and what it wants to become today.THE BIGGEST QUESTION: WHO CONTROLS THE SUPPLY?TUT’s holder concentration looks extremely high. However, exchange wallets and the burn address account for a large portion, so saying “whales control everything” would be misleading.The real question is the major non-exchange wallets.One wallet reportedly holds around 219M TUT, roughly 22% of max supply.Who controls it? Team, early contributor, market maker, investor, or something else?Until that wallet is identified, I wouldn’t call this manipulation. But it is a major due-diligence point because whoever controls it could materially affect available supply and selling pressure.WHAT I WANT TO KNOW How many real users does the platform have? What are the actual products and revenues? How much value does TUT capture from the ecosystem? Who controls the major wallets? And how much of the current valuation comes from actual utility versus liquidity and speculation?
These questions matter more than short-term price action