⚡ One Product, Two Ways to Handle the Infrastructure Behind It When I talk to teams building payment products with $BTC crypto, I usually see 2 different approaches to custody: 1. Some see owning the infrastructure as part of their technical edge. They have the engineering depth and budget, so building it internally makes sense 💡 2. Others are more pragmatic. They want to give users a great crypto product, move faster, and keep the team focused on growth, not building and maintaining all the plumbing themselves. I understand that approach, because custody is much more than "store the private key" : 👉 Generate → derive → hot/cold split → back up → control access → rotate → sign. For teams that don’t want to deal with this complexity, solutions like Wallet-as-a-Service could offer another route: integrate the infrastructure instead of rebuilding the whole stack internally. WhiteBIT WaaS could be one way to do this, covering not only custody but also other parts of the wallet infrastructure, such as: https://institutional.whitebit.com/crypto-wallets-for-business?utm_source=coinmarketcap&utm_medium=max_waas&utm_campaign=post ✔️ storage and security for 340+ assets across 80+ networks, ✔️ automated AML/KYC compliance, transaction checks, ✔️ technical updates and scaling on the provider side. Ultimately, it comes down to how much crypto infrastructure a company really needs to own - and how much could simply run underneath while the team builds what users came for. Disclaimer: This is not financial or investment advice. DYOR before making any decisions. Use at your own risk. #BTC Price Analysis# #Bitcoin Price Prediction: What is Bitcoins next move?#