#dusk Last night, I was scrolling on X for updates when one of Dusk's posts stopped me. I read through it.

And what caught me was the graphic they shared alongside it.

Per Dusk's own post shared on X, a bank sees the payment instruction and authorization. An exchange sees only the eligibility proof. A custodian sees the asset record and settlement status. None of the three sees what the others see. Everything outside their specific field stays marked, in their own words, "not disclosed."

I hadn't thought about selective disclosure this way before. Day 3 was about a single person proving eligibility without exposing their identity. This is different, it's the same transaction being verified by multiple institutions simultaneously, each one blind to everything except their own slice.

That's a harder coordination problem than one person hiding their data from one service. Three separate parties have to trust the same transaction is valid without any of them seeing the whole thing.

What isn't clear to me is how disputes get resolved when a party's narrow view isn't enough to catch a problem that would only show up by looking across all three slices at once.

$DUSK @Dusk