And this is where I stopped treating “the infrastructure exists” and “I can trade the assets” as the same milestone. Dusk’s base network is live, but Dusk Trade sits above it as a separate application layer and is still being built.
The current product surface is a waitlist, with Dusk describing the eventual trader workflow around discovering, buying and selling regulated tokenized assets. I think that separation is worth keeping visible. A blockchain can already provide settlement, execution and the primitives needed for regulated markets while the actual venue a trader interacts with is still coming together.
Dusk is unusually explicit about that stack boundary: DuskDS and the execution layers provide infrastructure underneath, while Dusk Trade is meant to turn those pieces into the user-facing market workflow.

That prevents me from reading every tokenization announcement as immediate liquidity or immediate access. For a trader, those are different questions. Can the infrastructure support the market? And is the trading product actually available today? Right now, Dusk has a clearer answer to the first than the second. That distinction makes the roadmap easier to judge without pretending the finish line has already arrived. @Dusk $DUSK #dusk