I had a friend who moved his funds through an EVM wallet thinking he was being careful using a fresh address for every transactio but a chain analyst friend of mine pulled up his wallet in minutes & showed him how the account balance itself was the giveaway, didnt matter how many addresses he rotated through the running balance sitting on that account model told the whole story anyway. That memory came back to me when i looked closer at why @Dusk is upfront about Hedger not offering full anonymity on DuskEVM. Most chains either pretend an account based system can be made fully anonymous with enough tricks bolted on or they oversell a privacy feature without admitting what the underlying architecture actually allows, & people end up trusting a privacy guarantee that was never really there to begin with. @Dusk approach looks different because it just says it plainly the EVMs account model cant give full anonymity the way Zedger does but Hedger still delivers complete transactional privacy within what that model allows so the trade off is named instead of hidden behind marketing. That made me think the real issue was never which system is more private in isolation its that people assume one chain should give them everything & nobody tells them different models are built for different guarantees from the start. Im still not sure though is complete transactional privacy on an account based system actually enough for someone who specifically needs the anonymity level Zedger offers or does that gap just push serious privacy use elsewhere once people realize whats structurally missing..?

@Dusk $DUSK #dusk
#OilHoldsLosses $TAC $TMX