Is it really Four parts working as one!
نشر
--
Luke_龙
·
--
#dusk $DUSK
Kept writing about Dusk's pieces as five separate threads, DuskEVM, the EU partnerships, the privacy model, native issuance, whatever come up that week.
Went back through everything I've posted and realized I'd never actually laid out why they are not five projects, But one build order.
So @Dusk
DuskEVM and Hedger are the execution layer, an EVM-compatible environment institutions and developers already know, with confidential transaction support built in through homomorphic encryption plus ZK proofs,and not bolted on after
The EU-licensed partnerships, NPEX, Chainlink, are the legitimacy layer.
NPEX alone plans to bring over 300M EUR in assets on-chain, but that number means nothing without a regulated venue actually willing to settle through Dusk in the first place.
Programmable privacy is the design principle threading through both:
privacy where it's needed, transparency where it's useful, selective disclosure for whoever's authorized to look.
Not a feature, a constraint every other piece has to satisfy.
Native issuance is the asset model-the difference between wrapping an existing off-chain bond and actually building one on-chain, ownership through settlement, as one record instead of six reconciling systems.
Four pillars.
Each one, on its own, is infrastructure.
None of them, alone, is something an actual investor ever touches.
That's what Dusk Trade is for.
It's not a fifth pillar sitting next to the other four — it's the application layer sitting on top of all of them.
Confidential execution Hedger, regulatory legitimacy from the NPEX-style partnerships, the privacy model governing what's disclosed and to whom, native-issued assets as the actual inventory being traded. Remove any one of the four and Dusk Trade isn't a regulated venue, it's just another interface.
All I got from Whitepaper.
But does bundling four hard problems into one front-facing product make Dusk Trade the strongest case for the whole stack, or the single point where all four have to work perfectly at once for any of it to matter?
Kept writing about Dusk's pieces as five separate threads, DuskEVM, the EU partnerships, the privacy model, native issuance, whatever come up that week.
Went back through everything I've posted and realized I'd never actually laid out why they are not five projects, But one build order.
So @Dusk
DuskEVM and Hedger are the execution layer, an EVM-compatible environment institutions and developers already know, with confidential transaction support built in through homomorphic encryption plus ZK proofs,and not bolted on after
The EU-licensed partnerships, NPEX, Chainlink, are the legitimacy layer.
NPEX alone plans to bring over 300M EUR in assets on-chain, but that number means nothing without a regulated venue actually willing to settle through Dusk in the first place.
Programmable privacy is the design principle threading through both:
privacy where it's needed, transparency where it's useful, selective disclosure for whoever's authorized to look.
Not a feature, a constraint every other piece has to satisfy.
Native issuance is the asset model-the difference between wrapping an existing off-chain bond and actually building one on-chain, ownership through settlement, as one record instead of six reconciling systems.
Four pillars.
Each one, on its own, is infrastructure.
None of them, alone, is something an actual investor ever touches.
That's what Dusk Trade is for.
It's not a fifth pillar sitting next to the other four — it's the application layer sitting on top of all of them.
Confidential execution Hedger, regulatory legitimacy from the NPEX-style partnerships, the privacy model governing what's disclosed and to whom, native-issued assets as the actual inventory being traded. Remove any one of the four and Dusk Trade isn't a regulated venue, it's just another interface.
All I got from Whitepaper.
But does bundling four hard problems into one front-facing product make Dusk Trade the strongest case for the whole stack, or the single point where all four have to work perfectly at once for any of it to matter?
إخلاء مسؤولية: يتضمن آراء جهات خارجية. لا تُعدّ نصيحة. يُمكن استخدام Binance AI دون أي ضمان. اطلع على الشروط والأحكام.