I’ve been thinking about @Dusk again since last night, and hmm, the more I look into what comes next, the more Dusk Trade keeps standing out to me.

At first, I thought the interesting part was simply bringing more regulated assets on-chain.

But that feels too easy.

If #Dusk Trade can actually connect businesses looking to raise capital with investors looking for regulated opportunities, then the bigger story might be what happens after those assets are issued.

They need to be transferred, settled, and actually used.

And that’s where I started thinking about $DUSK differently.

More financial activity could mean more network activity → more fees → more utility for DUSK through the network and staking.

So there’s potentially a pretty interesting loop here:

new financial assets → more activity → more fees → more demand for DUSK.

But there’s one part I’m still trying to figure out.

If Dusk Trade eventually generates meaningful revenue, where does that value actually go?

To stakers? Buybacks and burns? Or something else decided by the community?

I don’t think the question is whether Dusk can put more assets on-chain.

The more interesting question to me is whether those assets can create enough real activity to turn into lasting utility for DUSK.

Hmm, that’s probably the part I’ll be watching most closely.
$UAI $MarsCoin #BitcoinRises23.6%Weekly #BitcoinOpenInterestFallsToTwoMonthLow #AIHardwareStocksFallPreMarketAAOIDown11.66% #TinFed