#dusk $DUSK @Dusk i keep watching DUSK and honestly everyone is fixated on the wrong stuff.

price bounced off $0.070 back to $0.074, RSI popped out of deep oversold around 22. nice for a screenshot, sure. but who cares?

the real signal is buried under the hype. 39 fixes rolled out in the AEGIS update, plus ongoing work to make DuskEVM actually feel familiar to ETH devs.

privacy chains are notorious for this—impressive tech on paper, absolute nightmare to build on. that dev friction kills projects way faster than bad tokenomics ever will.

on the institutional side, the NPEX partnership under AFM regulation (tokenizing €300M+ in assets) gives Dusk something real to point to. actual institutional activity, not just a flashy roadmap. I’ve been watching their RWA narrative closely, but I’m still holding off on adding to my position until I see real dev traction.

still, let’s be real for a sec that august 16 bridge incident was a huge red flag. manual interventions on cross chain infrastructure make me nervous, even if the core chain held up fine.

and the token economics still feel like a coinflip to me. if gas gets completely abstracted for users, does all this activity actually drive DUSK demand long term? IDK yet.

anyone actually deploying on DuskEVM right now, or are we all just watching from the sidelines?