#dusk $DUSK @Dusk What kept sticking with me about Dusk’s transaction setup wasn’t the simple act of moving value.
It was how the whole system has to measure and charge for the real effort each transaction triggers.

Everything runs through the transfer contract: it checks the rules, deals with deployments or calls, and takes gas to match the computational load. That gas isn’t some extra charge hanging off the side. It’s the direct price of the resources the network actually spends.

It makes sense on paper. When computation isn’t free, baking its cost into the transaction itself lets the network stay honest about what it uses instead of pretending every operation is unlimited.

Still, the more flexible and powerful those transactions get, the tougher it becomes to keep the costs clear and predictable without turning the whole experience into something users have to study.

So the open question remains: does this clear accounting of work make Dusk’s execution more durable over time, or does trying to price every bit of computation create a new layer of friction that gets in people’s way?
$XRP
$ETH