I’ve started thinking about regulated assets on @Dusk less as a “KYC problem” and more as a coordination problem.

Knowing who a user is is only the first step. The harder part is making sure that identity, wallet permissions and the asset’s transfer rules all stay aligned.

That’s where @Dusk gets interesting to me.

A credential can establish eligibility. A wallet can represent that verified participant. Smart-contract rules can then determine whether a transfer is actually permitted.

But adding layers creates a new question:

What happens when someone’s eligibility changes after the wallet is already approved?

Does the system immediately reflect that change on-chain, or does another layer need to catch it first?

For regulated assets, that synchronization may matter just as much as privacy itself.
$ETHFI
$GRAM
$DUSK
#dusk @Dusk

🗳️ If eligibility changes, which layer should control access?