I was comparing fee receipts across different Dusk operations and noticed a basic Moonlight send burns one amount of gas while a contract interaction or complex verification can consume more gas. The protocol meters actual computational work, doesn't charge for unused gas, and charges only for resources consumed.

That sounds fair. But the gap matters because the applications Dusk targets — confidential settlements, identity proofs, sophisticated contracts — tend to be the heavier workloads. The headline fee stays low for simple transfers, but complexity quietly inflates the bill.

Most chains market flat cheapness. Dusk's model exposes the true cost of complexity instead of hiding it.

Does that make the network economically honest, or just price advanced use cases out of everyday reach?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
$TUT $TRUMP