@Dusk_Foundation #dusk
The more I look at tokenized finance, the more I think putting the asset on-chain might be the easy part.
The harder part is everything that happens around it.
An investor still needs to be on-boarded. Their eligibility may need to be checked. Transfers can have restrictions. The payment leg has to match the asset leg. And eventually, everything still needs to settle correctly.
That’s what made @Dusk_Foundation Trade more interesting to me.
It isn’t being built around simply listing tokenized assets. The workflow includes investor onboarding, wallet connection, controlled transfers, payment coordination, and settlement.
So maybe the real value of tokenization isn’t just turning an asset into a token. Maybe it’s whether the fragmented process around that asset can become one coherent workflow.
If that coordination remains fragmented, how much does tokenization actually change?
#dusk $DUSK $BTC $BNB
The more I look at tokenized finance, the more I think putting the asset on-chain might be the easy part.
The harder part is everything that happens around it.
An investor still needs to be on-boarded. Their eligibility may need to be checked. Transfers can have restrictions. The payment leg has to match the asset leg. And eventually, everything still needs to settle correctly.
That’s what made @Dusk_Foundation Trade more interesting to me.
It isn’t being built around simply listing tokenized assets. The workflow includes investor onboarding, wallet connection, controlled transfers, payment coordination, and settlement.
So maybe the real value of tokenization isn’t just turning an asset into a token. Maybe it’s whether the fragmented process around that asset can become one coherent workflow.
If that coordination remains fragmented, how much does tokenization actually change?
#dusk $DUSK $BTC $BNB