A blockchain can collect a long list of integrations and still struggle to prove that anyone truly needs it.
That’s why I pay more attention to the first application that creates repeat demand than to the number of projects announcing support.
With Dusk, I think the stronger signal would be an application where its privacy and compliance features are not optional extras, but part of the reason the product can exist. If users keep returning, capital keeps moving, and developers build around that same use case, the network starts developing an actual economic loop.
Hundreds of integrations can look impressive on paper. One application generating consistent activity can reveal much more.
For me, the real test for Dusk is not how many things can be built on it. It’s whether something gets built that would genuinely be harder to build somewhere else. #dusk @Dusk $DUSK
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
That’s why I pay more attention to the first application that creates repeat demand than to the number of projects announcing support.
With Dusk, I think the stronger signal would be an application where its privacy and compliance features are not optional extras, but part of the reason the product can exist. If users keep returning, capital keeps moving, and developers build around that same use case, the network starts developing an actual economic loop.
Hundreds of integrations can look impressive on paper. One application generating consistent activity can reveal much more.
For me, the real test for Dusk is not how many things can be built on it. It’s whether something gets built that would genuinely be harder to build somewhere else. #dusk @Dusk $DUSK
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK