I TRIED TO WORK OUT WHICH €300M THE NUMBER REFERS TO

Partnership figures in tokenization tend to describe a partner's existing book rather than anything that has moved on chain. The two get printed in the same sentence often enough that the distinction stops registering.

@Dusk uses the figure carefully in most places. The Dusk Trade waitlist post calls NPEX a licensed exchange with €300M AUM, bringing tokenized assets and funds on chain. An earlier post says NPEX will bring their €300M assets under management onto the Dusk blockchain. The Binance US listing post says we will tokenize their assets. Future tense throughout.

The Chainlink release from November gives a different number for a different thing. NPEX has facilitated 102 successful financings up to now, amounting to more than €196 million. That is capital raised through the platform since 2008, and it tracks a visible progression: €185 million across 97 financings in March 2024, €196 million across 102 by late 2025.

There is one line that cuts the other way, and I would rather raise it myself. The January 2025 post mainnet roadmap says all assets under NPEX management are now tokenized on Dusk. It sits in a list beside items using will and plans, and Dusk went back to future tense in October and November of the same year, which is hard to explain if the work had finished ten months earlier.

I checked the trackers too. #dusk does not appear on RWA.xyz, which lists 39 networks down to ones with almost nothing on them, and it is not among DefiLlama's RWA chains.
Dusk's shielded transfers would hide any value anyway, which is a fair answer.
So what figure would either of us accept as showing something has actually settled?
$DUSK