#termmax @TermMax
I tried the manual version first, actually, before judging the shortcut. Bridged into TermMax on a non-Ethereum chain the old way separate bridge, separate swap, then over to open the position. Three tabs. Two approvals. One moment where I stared at the network selector longer than I'd like to admit, not fully sure I had the right chain queued up. That's the baseline this integration is being measured against.

So I went and checked where the actual liquidity sits. Across the nine chains TermMax runs on, Ethereum holds something like 98% of total value locked. Everything else is scraps. Which makes we wonder what problem the LI.FI/Jumper integration, letting you bridge and open a fixed-rate position in one flow instead of hopping apps, is really solving, if the money isn't spreading out anyway.

The upside is genuine, though. That manual friction I felt wrong-network paranoia, an extra swap I didn't need is exactly what folding everything into one flow removes. Fewer steps, fewer chances to fumble your own transaction.

What it doesn't remove is who's picking the route. Not me anymore. The aggregator, optimizing for cost or speed, not necessarily the security tradeoffs I'd choose if I slowed down.

So convenient for the user, or just relocating where the risk sits?