I almost treated $TMX leverage like a normal loop today: borrow, swap, deposit, repeat. Then I noticed something I’d been overlooking in @TermMax Leverager.
The whole leverage build happens atomically.
Borrowed debt tokens and my initial contribution are combined, used to buy collateral, and locked into a Gearing Token in the same transaction.
On my small test, the part I liked most wasn't the leverage itself. It was knowing there wasn't a borrowed-funds-in-between state sitting there while I waited for the next step.
With a normal loop, that gap can mean extra slippage, a failed transaction, or simply a final position different from what I planned.
There’s still a tradeoff. Atomic execution reduces that execution gap, but I lose the ability to pause and resize after each loop.
I’m watching how this behaves during volatile pricing.
If that holds up, I think the flexibility tradeoff may be worth it.
$TMX
#TermMax @TermMax
The whole leverage build happens atomically.
Borrowed debt tokens and my initial contribution are combined, used to buy collateral, and locked into a Gearing Token in the same transaction.
On my small test, the part I liked most wasn't the leverage itself. It was knowing there wasn't a borrowed-funds-in-between state sitting there while I waited for the next step.
With a normal loop, that gap can mean extra slippage, a failed transaction, or simply a final position different from what I planned.
There’s still a tradeoff. Atomic execution reduces that execution gap, but I lose the ability to pause and resize after each loop.
I’m watching how this behaves during volatile pricing.
If that holds up, I think the flexibility tradeoff may be worth it.
$TMX
#TermMax @TermMax