#dusk $DUSK @Dusk Banks, exchanges and custodians may inspect the same transaction, but they do not need to see the same data.
That distinction is what makes Dusk’s selective disclosure model interesting to me.
An exchange may need proof that a trader is eligible.
A custodian may need confirmation of ownership.
A regulator may require access to specific transaction records.
None of those checks automatically justify exposing the customer’s full balance, identity or trading history to everyone else.
Dusk treats disclosure as permissioned access to required evidence not a choice between complete secrecy and complete transparency.
That feels far closer to how regulated finance actually handles information.
That distinction is what makes Dusk’s selective disclosure model interesting to me.
An exchange may need proof that a trader is eligible.
A custodian may need confirmation of ownership.
A regulator may require access to specific transaction records.
None of those checks automatically justify exposing the customer’s full balance, identity or trading history to everyone else.
Dusk treats disclosure as permissioned access to required evidence not a choice between complete secrecy and complete transparency.
That feels far closer to how regulated finance actually handles information.
