Spent Tuesday evening on this and it still isnt fully settled in my head.
We talk about onchain data like theres two settings. public or private. everything visible or nothing visible
Dusk keeps describing a third one and I think its the actual product.
selective disclosure. authorised parties get evidence without unnecessary data coming with it. Citadel is the identity layer that does this, letting someone prove an attribute.... residency, an age bracket, accreditation.... without revealing more than the attribute
proving something and showing everything have never been the same act. we just built systems as if they were
Uhm, and thats the gap between crypto and regulated finance compressed into one idea. regulators dont want everything public. they want the right party seeing the right thing at the right moment
a transparent chain fails that by oversharing.a private one fails by having nothing to show. selective disclosure is the only shape that satisfies both
Im not certain how well it holds under real supervision. thats tested slowly, by regulators, not by users....
whats your take
@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK