Gas fees are something many coins and companies often make confusing or misleading. That’s why I started researching this topic.
After going through many projects all of sudden I got attention on @Dusk_Foundation . The thing attract me to learn more was that it was not like other projects. I started looking more closely at Dusk’s gas model, and one small detail changed how I think about transaction costs.
What caught my attention is that users pay for the gas actually consumed, while unused gas isn’t charged. For example, using 20,000 gas at 2 LUX per gas results in a 40,000 LUX fee.
But there’s another side traders shouldn’t ignore: if execution runs out of gas and the transaction reverts, the computation already performed still carries a cost.
I see that as both a strength and a risk. The strength is clearer resource accounting, the risk is that repeatedly submitting poorly estimated transactions can turn failed execution into an avoidable expense.
For my #DUSK strategy, this makes me more careful with transaction settings rather than treating fees as an afterthought. I want to understand the mechanics before increasing my exposure.
I had also pair this analysis with a $DUSK gas/transaction dashboard or self-created fee infographic.
Could transparent fee mechanics become an underrated advantage for Dusk as onchain activity grows?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $RE #bnb
After going through many projects all of sudden I got attention on @Dusk_Foundation . The thing attract me to learn more was that it was not like other projects. I started looking more closely at Dusk’s gas model, and one small detail changed how I think about transaction costs.
What caught my attention is that users pay for the gas actually consumed, while unused gas isn’t charged. For example, using 20,000 gas at 2 LUX per gas results in a 40,000 LUX fee.
But there’s another side traders shouldn’t ignore: if execution runs out of gas and the transaction reverts, the computation already performed still carries a cost.
I see that as both a strength and a risk. The strength is clearer resource accounting, the risk is that repeatedly submitting poorly estimated transactions can turn failed execution into an avoidable expense.
For my #DUSK strategy, this makes me more careful with transaction settings rather than treating fees as an afterthought. I want to understand the mechanics before increasing my exposure.
I had also pair this analysis with a $DUSK gas/transaction dashboard or self-created fee infographic.
Could transparent fee mechanics become an underrated advantage for Dusk as onchain activity grows?
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk $RE #bnb