I kept thinking about how easily the word “privacy” can create the wrong expectation.

When I first looked at Dusk, I assumed privacy would simply be the default state. But the more I dug into it, the more interesting the design became. Dusk separates public activity through Moonlight from shielded transactions through Phoenix.

That distinction matters beyond the technology.

A business might want a transaction hidden from the entire network while still being able to prove certain details to an auditor or regulator. At the same time, some payments may not need privacy at all.

So maybe the real question isn’t whether a blockchain is private, but who gets to decide when something should be private.

Dusk makes that choice more explicit. I’m still wondering whether ordinary users will find that flexibility intuitive, or whether “privacy” will create expectations that the transaction model quietly contradicts.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk