@Dusk_Foundation I first noticed it when two DUSK-connected views disagreed for a few seconds.
One had already picked up the transaction. The other was still showing the old state.
Nothing was actually broken, which made it more interesting. The chain looked fine. The problem was somewhere in the path between node data, indexing, the app backend, and what the wallet was showing me.
That is probably the part I would watch if Dusk suddenly gets a lot more applications.
More apps do not just mean more transactions. They mean more balance checks, history queries, event subscriptions, wallet connections, signatures, network changes, retries. A lot of small coordination work that users never see until one layer starts lagging.
And wallets get awkward fast. With a few apps, repeated approvals are manageable. With twenty, users start clicking through things they only half understand. Then the wallet is not really just holding DUSK anymore. It is deciding how much operational context the user can actually follow.
The slightly uncomfortable part is that Dusk itself could be running normally while the ecosystem feels unreliable from the outside.
I would want to see several busy DUSK apps hit the same infrastructure at once. Not in a demo. Under messy, uneven traffic. That is where the weak dependency usually shows itself. #dusk $DUSK
One had already picked up the transaction. The other was still showing the old state.
Nothing was actually broken, which made it more interesting. The chain looked fine. The problem was somewhere in the path between node data, indexing, the app backend, and what the wallet was showing me.
That is probably the part I would watch if Dusk suddenly gets a lot more applications.
More apps do not just mean more transactions. They mean more balance checks, history queries, event subscriptions, wallet connections, signatures, network changes, retries. A lot of small coordination work that users never see until one layer starts lagging.
And wallets get awkward fast. With a few apps, repeated approvals are manageable. With twenty, users start clicking through things they only half understand. Then the wallet is not really just holding DUSK anymore. It is deciding how much operational context the user can actually follow.
The slightly uncomfortable part is that Dusk itself could be running normally while the ecosystem feels unreliable from the outside.
I would want to see several busy DUSK apps hit the same infrastructure at once. Not in a demo. Under messy, uneven traffic. That is where the weak dependency usually shows itself. #dusk $DUSK