#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
There’s a hidden supply battle
DUSK has a long emission schedule: the network emits 500M DUSK over 36 years, with emissions halving every four years. �
DOCS
At the same time, staking locks DUSK and helps secure the network.
That creates an interesting balance.
Staking can reduce liquid supply.
But staking rewards also add new supply.
So saying “more staked = automatically bullish” is too simple.
What I’d really watch is:
staked DUSK vs new emissions vs actual network demand.
That’s the supply-demand battle I think matters.
#dusk @Dusk
$TUT
$HEMI
Which matters more long term?
There’s a hidden supply battle
DUSK has a long emission schedule: the network emits 500M DUSK over 36 years, with emissions halving every four years. �
DOCS
At the same time, staking locks DUSK and helps secure the network.
That creates an interesting balance.
Staking can reduce liquid supply.
But staking rewards also add new supply.
So saying “more staked = automatically bullish” is too simple.
What I’d really watch is:
staked DUSK vs new emissions vs actual network demand.
That’s the supply-demand battle I think matters.
#dusk @Dusk
$TUT
$HEMI
Which matters more long term?
A) Lower emissions
0%
B) Higher staking
34%
C) Higher demand
33%
D) Demand + lower emissions
33%
3 الأصوات • تمّ إغلاق التصويت