Looking at the docs again… every concrete workflow listed for Dusk—regulated securities, institutional DeFi, confidential payments, DvP—routes through Citadel for eligibility. Identity is not treated as its own sector. It is the gate.
Dusk ($DUSK ) #dusk @Duskfoundation built the credential layer so finance can stay private while still enforcing residency or accreditation. Once verified, selective disclosure lets the same proof gate transfers and positions without re-exposing the underlying data. Gaming never shows up in that stack. The privacy model and the public/shielded transaction split were shaped around market data that cannot sit in the clear.
What changed for me was realizing identity is load-bearing for finance rather than a parallel vertical. Without that binding, the compliance rules inside the asset contracts lose their on-chain force.
Next check: whether any live product surface outside securities or lending actually reuses those same Citadel credentials for access control.
@Dusk_Foundation
Dusk ($DUSK ) #dusk @Duskfoundation built the credential layer so finance can stay private while still enforcing residency or accreditation. Once verified, selective disclosure lets the same proof gate transfers and positions without re-exposing the underlying data. Gaming never shows up in that stack. The privacy model and the public/shielded transaction split were shaped around market data that cannot sit in the clear.
What changed for me was realizing identity is load-bearing for finance rather than a parallel vertical. Without that binding, the compliance rules inside the asset contracts lose their on-chain force.
Next check: whether any live product surface outside securities or lending actually reuses those same Citadel credentials for access control.
@Dusk_Foundation