#dusk @Dusk I took a small test position in Dusk recently, and honestly, I was still pretty unsure about the privacy angle.What changed my view was realizing that Dusk isn’t really arguing for “more secrecy.” The interesting part is programmable privacy: keeping transaction details private by default, while still allowing the right parties to verify or access specific information when needed.That matters a lot more for regulated assets than simply hiding data. Hedger’s use of homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs points toward a system where financial activity can remain provable without making every detail public.The non-obvious part for me is that privacy becomes a permissions problem, not just an encryption problem: who can see what, and under which conditions?I’m not calling it proven yet. My position is small, and I’d rather watch how this behaves with real transactions before getting more confident. But that’s the part of Dusk I’m watching most closely now.$DUSK
What makes Dusk’s privacy model different?