#dusk
I think people sometimes misunderstand the privacy problem in regulated finance.
It isn't simply:
“How do we hide the transaction?”
The harder question is:
“Who actually needs to see it?”
An investor shouldn't necessarily have their entire position exposed to every wallet watching the chain.
But a regulator might need to verify something.
An auditor might need evidence.
An issuer might need to check ownership or eligibility.
And the market itself still needs things that can be observed and settled.
That's the part of @Dusk_Foundation I find genuinely interesting.
Dusk isn't treating privacy like an on/off switch. Its architecture separates public flows from confidential ones, while allowing information to be disclosed to authorized parties when there's a legitimate reason for them to see it.
That makes much more sense to me for financial markets.
Because putting a bond, fund or other security onchain isn't the hard part.
The hard part is deciding what happens when different people need different levels of visibility into the same asset.
That's a problem most crypto conversations don't spend enough time on.
Dusk is building around it.
And with DuskEVM, that approach is being brought into an EVM-compatible environment, with Hedger supporting confidential EVM workflows.
That's a much more interesting pitch than “blockchain, but private.”
$DUSK @Dusk
I think people sometimes misunderstand the privacy problem in regulated finance.
It isn't simply:
“How do we hide the transaction?”
The harder question is:
“Who actually needs to see it?”
An investor shouldn't necessarily have their entire position exposed to every wallet watching the chain.
But a regulator might need to verify something.
An auditor might need evidence.
An issuer might need to check ownership or eligibility.
And the market itself still needs things that can be observed and settled.
That's the part of @Dusk_Foundation I find genuinely interesting.
Dusk isn't treating privacy like an on/off switch. Its architecture separates public flows from confidential ones, while allowing information to be disclosed to authorized parties when there's a legitimate reason for them to see it.
That makes much more sense to me for financial markets.
Because putting a bond, fund or other security onchain isn't the hard part.
The hard part is deciding what happens when different people need different levels of visibility into the same asset.
That's a problem most crypto conversations don't spend enough time on.
Dusk is building around it.
And with DuskEVM, that approach is being brought into an EVM-compatible environment, with Hedger supporting confidential EVM workflows.
That's a much more interesting pitch than “blockchain, but private.”
$DUSK @Dusk