Here’s what happened when a mint exploit went from “scary token count” to a real $234M market problem.

Crypto traders get wrecked when they only look at the number of tokens minted and miss the dollar value behind it. That’s how people either panic-sell too late or buy the “cheap dip” before realizing supply just got nuked.

The first mint was 4B tokens, but the price had already crashed so hard that the actual dollar impact was relatively small. It looked ugly on-chain, but not necessarily catastrophic in market terms. The second mint changed the story: 30B tokens, now estimated around $234M, is no longer just an inflated supply headline.

This is why it reminds me of past mint disasters like $PLA and $GALA, where the first shock was bad, but the follow-up supply expansion was what really damaged confidence. Once the market starts pricing in “they can mint again,” liquidity dries up fast and every bounce gets treated like exit liquidity.

For anyone tracking these cases in $USDT terms, the lesson is simple: token count tells you scale, dollar value tells you damage, and repeat exploits tell you whether trust is gone. What’s your take on how the market should price a second mint exploit?

#CryptoSecurity #Altcoins #DeFi