Dusk is interesting because the obvious metric how many credentials it can issue may not tell us much about whether the system is actually working.
The more meaningful question is what happens after a credential exists. Can a financial institution use it inside a real workflow, verify what it needs, and move forward without forcing the same user through another round of checks?
That’s where Dusk’s design becomes more interesting to me. Instead of treating compliance as something every institution has to rebuild inside its own silo, the idea is to make verified credentials usable across different financial processes while still keeping the underlying requirements intact.
But that also creates a dependency that is easy to overlook. Dusk doesn’t just need people to hold credentials; it needs independent institutions to trust them, understand the information behind them, and actually build them into their operations.
So credential issuance is only the starting point. Adoption is really about repeated acceptance.
For $DUSK, I’d watch that far more closely than raw credential numbers.
Can Dusk keep this model simple enough for institutions to use at scale once real transaction volume, different regulations, and operational constraints enter the picture?
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk
The more meaningful question is what happens after a credential exists. Can a financial institution use it inside a real workflow, verify what it needs, and move forward without forcing the same user through another round of checks?
That’s where Dusk’s design becomes more interesting to me. Instead of treating compliance as something every institution has to rebuild inside its own silo, the idea is to make verified credentials usable across different financial processes while still keeping the underlying requirements intact.
But that also creates a dependency that is easy to overlook. Dusk doesn’t just need people to hold credentials; it needs independent institutions to trust them, understand the information behind them, and actually build them into their operations.
So credential issuance is only the starting point. Adoption is really about repeated acceptance.
For $DUSK, I’d watch that far more closely than raw credential numbers.
Can Dusk keep this model simple enough for institutions to use at scale once real transaction volume, different regulations, and operational constraints enter the picture?
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk