I’ve been digging into Dusk again, and I think I was looking at it too simply before.
Calling it just another privacy chain misses the more interesting part. Dusk is separating the public and private sides instead of forcing everything into one model.
DuskDS handles the core settlement layer, DuskEVM gives developers the familiar EVM setup, and Hedger brings confidentiality in when a transaction actually needs it.
That makes a lot more sense for real financial markets. Not everything needs to be hidden, but sensitive activity shouldn’t have to be fully exposed either.
The €200M+ issued through NPEX and 20,000+ investors is interesting, but I’m more curious about what happens underneath that number.
How many assets are actually settling? How often are they trading? And how much of that activity is really using the private side?
For me, that’s the real test for Dusk. The architecture looks good on paper. Now I want to see real users put it to work.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk
Calling it just another privacy chain misses the more interesting part. Dusk is separating the public and private sides instead of forcing everything into one model.
DuskDS handles the core settlement layer, DuskEVM gives developers the familiar EVM setup, and Hedger brings confidentiality in when a transaction actually needs it.
That makes a lot more sense for real financial markets. Not everything needs to be hidden, but sensitive activity shouldn’t have to be fully exposed either.
The €200M+ issued through NPEX and 20,000+ investors is interesting, but I’m more curious about what happens underneath that number.
How many assets are actually settling? How often are they trading? And how much of that activity is really using the private side?
For me, that’s the real test for Dusk. The architecture looks good on paper. Now I want to see real users put it to work.
#dusk $DUSK @Dusk