Billions Lost To Bugs Prevented 🔥 Most of DeFi's biggest exploits happened on $ETH because Solidity doesn't prevent reentrancy by design. Move on $SUI closes that attack vector at the compiler level. Reentrancy attacks, asset duplication bugs, and integer overflows are not black swan events. They are predictable consequences of an execution model that allows contracts to call back into themselves before state changes are recorded. The DAO hack, Poly Network, and dozens of protocol drains since all share the same root cause. Solidity doesn't block these attack vectors, and auditing is an imperfect defense against attacks the language itself permits. Move enforces resource types. Assets in Move can only exist once, cannot be copied without explicit permission, and cannot be created from nothing. A reentrancy attack requires duplicating or redirecting an asset mid-execution. Move makes that impossible to write, and the compiler rejects it before the code is ever deployed. This is not a stronger auditing process. It is a different model of what an asset is. Every billion dollars flowing into DeFi infrastructure is exposed to whatever the execution environment permits. A compiler that rejects the exploit outright is a fundamentally stronger guarantee than auditors working against a language that allows it. Sui's throughput numbers get the attention, but it’s the security architecture part I keep coming back to. #DeFi #Altcoin Season#