I’ve started looking Dusk at differently.
At first the regulated securities angle made me think the main challenge was privacy.
But the more I dug into it the more I realized privacy alone isn’t enough.
A regulated asset cannot be completely transparent.
But it also cannat be completely hidden.
There has to be a middle ground where sensitive information stays protected while an authorized party can still reveal or verify what is actually required.
Thats where Dusk caught my attention.
Citadel the account based model selective disclosure and the sA consensus design start making more sense when viewed as one workflow rather than separate features.
The network has to protect the state.
It has to process the right state changes.
And then it has to reach agreement that the resulting state is valid.
Even the provisioner model adds another layer, because someone still needs to provide the infrastructure and have economic value at risk through DUSK staking.
What I find interesting is that none of these pieces solves the problem alone.
The real Test is whether they work together.
Because putting regulated assets onchain is one problem.
Making privacy compliance settlement and network security work together is a much harder one.
Thats the part of Dusk I am watching now.
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK
At first the regulated securities angle made me think the main challenge was privacy.
But the more I dug into it the more I realized privacy alone isn’t enough.
A regulated asset cannot be completely transparent.
But it also cannat be completely hidden.
There has to be a middle ground where sensitive information stays protected while an authorized party can still reveal or verify what is actually required.
Thats where Dusk caught my attention.
Citadel the account based model selective disclosure and the sA consensus design start making more sense when viewed as one workflow rather than separate features.
The network has to protect the state.
It has to process the right state changes.
And then it has to reach agreement that the resulting state is valid.
Even the provisioner model adds another layer, because someone still needs to provide the infrastructure and have economic value at risk through DUSK staking.
What I find interesting is that none of these pieces solves the problem alone.
The real Test is whether they work together.
Because putting regulated assets onchain is one problem.
Making privacy compliance settlement and network security work together is a much harder one.
Thats the part of Dusk I am watching now.
#dusk @Dusk $DUSK