Putting a regulated market onchain may sound like opening the door to everyone. Dusk makes a different promise: the workflow can include eligibility, wallet binding, and transfer controls before an asset moves.
Official docs describe access controls as part of Dusk's regulated workflow: eligibility checks, limits, holds, and restrictions. The market infrastructure guide adds investor onboarding and wallets bound to verified participants. That means public settlement does not equal unrestricted access. A chain can make the record easier to coordinate while the rules about who may hold or transfer an asset still matter.
The practical benefit is clarity: the access rule is part of the market design, not a note added after the transfer. The exact requirement still depends on the product and the regulatory market, so no single Dusk workflow should be treated as universal. Which check should come first in your view eligibility before a wallet can hold an asset, or control only when a transfer is attempted? @Dusk $DUSK #dusk
Official docs describe access controls as part of Dusk's regulated workflow: eligibility checks, limits, holds, and restrictions. The market infrastructure guide adds investor onboarding and wallets bound to verified participants. That means public settlement does not equal unrestricted access. A chain can make the record easier to coordinate while the rules about who may hold or transfer an asset still matter.
The practical benefit is clarity: the access rule is part of the market design, not a note added after the transfer. The exact requirement still depends on the product and the regulatory market, so no single Dusk workflow should be treated as universal. Which check should come first in your view eligibility before a wallet can hold an asset, or control only when a transfer is attempted? @Dusk $DUSK #dusk