One thing I keep coming back to when I study @Dusk_Foundation :
Why should an investor have to reveal everything just to prove 1 thing?
Imagine you are eligible to buy a regulated security.
The platform may need to verify your residency age bracket or accreditation status.
But does it really need your entire identity profile?
That is where Dusk's approach to selective disclosure becomes interesting.
Instead of treating compliance as:
Show everything.
The model can be:
Prove exactly what needs to be verified.
That is a very different user experience.
And when You connect it to regulated securities the implications become much bigger.
Eligibility
↓
Access control
↓
Transaction
↓
Privacy
↓
Authorized disclosure
↓
Settlement
The financial institution gets the information it is legally entitled to verify.
The investor did not automatically have to expose unrelated personal information.
That balance is something I think traditional finance & public blockchains both struggle with in different ways.
Dusk is trying to make that balance programmable.
Citadel provides the identity/access foundation.
Hedger brings confidential EVM workflows.
DuskEVM gives developers a familiar application environment.
And deterministic settlement provides finality underneath the financial workflow.
My takeaway:
The future of compliant finance should not be maximum disclosure.
It should be minimum necessary disclosure with maximum verifiability.
Thatz a privacy model I can actually see making sense for regulated markets.
#dusk $DUSK
Why should an investor have to reveal everything just to prove 1 thing?
Imagine you are eligible to buy a regulated security.
The platform may need to verify your residency age bracket or accreditation status.
But does it really need your entire identity profile?
That is where Dusk's approach to selective disclosure becomes interesting.
Instead of treating compliance as:
Show everything.
The model can be:
Prove exactly what needs to be verified.
That is a very different user experience.
And when You connect it to regulated securities the implications become much bigger.
Eligibility
↓
Access control
↓
Transaction
↓
Privacy
↓
Authorized disclosure
↓
Settlement
The financial institution gets the information it is legally entitled to verify.
The investor did not automatically have to expose unrelated personal information.
That balance is something I think traditional finance & public blockchains both struggle with in different ways.
Dusk is trying to make that balance programmable.
Citadel provides the identity/access foundation.
Hedger brings confidential EVM workflows.
DuskEVM gives developers a familiar application environment.
And deterministic settlement provides finality underneath the financial workflow.
My takeaway:
The future of compliant finance should not be maximum disclosure.
It should be minimum necessary disclosure with maximum verifiability.
Thatz a privacy model I can actually see making sense for regulated markets.
#dusk $DUSK