I initially saw DuskEVM as an infrastructure update: make Dusk easier to build on, reduce the cost of switching ecosystems, and let developers move with tools they already understand. But the more interesting question starts after that friction disappears. If deployment becomes dramatically easier, I’d expect experimentation to rise — yet more contracts, wallets, or interactions would not automatically mean deeper demand. The old learning curve was inefficient, but it also acted as a filter: developers who crossed it had already invested time, attention, and some degree of conviction. Familiar EVM tooling changes that self-selection dynamic. People can now test an idea before they have fully committed to Dusk itself. That is good for discovery, but it makes early activity harder to interpret. The numbers may improve before the underlying loyalty does. What I’d watch next is not simply how many users arrive, but how many stay, build again, and develop Dusk-native behavior once the initial cost of trying it approaches zero.

@Dusk_Foundation
#dusk $DUSK