Privacy and compliance usually get treated like opposites in crypto, pick one and lose the other, so it caught my attention that Dusk builds them as the same feature instead of a tradeoff. Transactions stay shielded by default, but a regulator can still verify that rules were followed, things like ownership limits, eligibility, transfer restrictions... without ever seeing the raw transaction data itself, it's proof of compliance, not disclosure of the data behind it 🧐. That distinction sounds small until you realize most "compliant" chains solve this by just making everything public and calling transparency the same thing as compliance, which quietly defeats the whole point of privacy in the first place 🔍
@DuskFoundation is selective disclosure actually enough for institutions, or will regulators eventually want more than a cryptographic promise?
@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK $AKE $VELVET