Dusk's docs open with confidential smart contracts as the headline feature, so I went looking for where that actually shows up for a regular user. What I found instead was a much more conventional entry point: the EVM compatible layer, positioned as the easy on ramp for developers who just want familiar Solidity tooling without touching zero knowledge anything. $DUSK #dusk @Dusk Foundation network runs two systems in parallel the privacy preserving execution layer that's the actual differentiator, and a plain EVM layer that behaves like dozens of other chains. The design choice makes sense pragmatically: confidential computation is hard to onboard people into cold, so you lead with something familiar. But it means the thing being marketed and the thing most people will first touch are not the same thing. The EVM layer gets you liquidity and integrations now; the confidential layer is where the "why Dusk" argument actually lives, and it's structurally the slower path to adoption. I kept wondering which one the token's value is actually supposed to track The easy layer that gets used, or the hard layer that's the reason to exist at all