@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK

I used to think the RWA race would come down to who could put the most assets on-chain. Looking closer at Dusk made me question that. Putting an asset on a blockchain is one thing. Making it usable in a real financial market is a much harder problem. You still have to deal with who can own it, how it can move, what information should stay private and how the final settlement works.

That is why Dusk Trade caught my attention. It is built around the processes that come after tokenization, including investor onboarding, eligibility, trading, payment coordination and settlement. Dusk also brings access controls, selective disclosure and deterministic settlement into the picture, so compliance isn't treated as an afterthought.

The part I find most interesting is what this could mean for DeFi. Maybe the valuable part of an RWA isn't the token itself. Maybe it's the infrastructure that makes that token usable while keeping the rules around it intact. Dusk is building toward that idea, but real adoption still has to prove whether it works beyond the technology.

**If tokenization is only the beginning, could the real RWA opportunity be the infrastructure that makes those assets usable?