I’ve played around with Dusk, and honestly, the first thing I noticed was how familiar DuskEVM feels. If you already know Solidity and Ethereum tools, you don’t have to throw everything you know out the window just to try something new.
But that’s not what kept me thinking about it.
I started asking myself a simpler question: what actually makes a developer stay?
That’s where Dusk gets interesting for me. The privacy side feels much deeper than just adding another privacy layer later. With its native privacy approach and Piecrust VM, Dusk is trying to bring confidential execution and ZK capabilities closer to the core of the network.
I like that idea, but I’m not pretending it’s effortless. More powerful infrastructure usually means more things developers have to understand, test, and eventually trust.
I’m also cautious when it comes to security. Audits and published remediation work are useful signals, but they don’t automatically answer every question.
For me, Dusk still has something to prove.
If it wants serious institutional adoption, “the technology works” won’t be enough. The real test is whether people can trust it when the stakes are high.

@Dusk_Foundation #dusk $DUSK