Privacy on a financial blockchain should not mean making the entire system invisible. That is where Dusk takes an interesting approach.

@Dusk_Foundation uses two native transaction models: Moonlight, which provides public account based transfers, and Phoenix, which provides shielded transfers using zero knowledge proofs. The important part is that these models can serve different financial requirements on the same network.

For example, a workflow may need certain information to remain publicly observable, while sensitive transaction details should not be exposed to every market participant. Dusk’s privacy model is designed around this distinction, with selective disclosure allowing authorized parties to obtain specific information when evidence, auditing, or regulatory requirements demand it.

This is a meaningful design consideration for regulated onchain finance because privacy and oversight are not necessarily opposites. The real challenge is deciding what should be public, what should remain confidential, and who should be able to see specific information when required.

That is the problem Dusk is trying to address at the infrastructure level.
@Dusk_Foundation $DUSK #dusk

What matters most for institutional blockchain adoption?